Module Twelve: Barter to Banter
Once upon a time, not too long ago but still a bit strange, the history of Western economics before 1500 CE unfolded like a complex story woven by a group of very energetic thinkers, smart business people, and ambitious rulers. It was a time when ideas about money and morals mixed together in a way that was as exciting as a jousting match in a busy market.
Imagine this: the ancient Greeks, at the height of their philosophical thinking, pondering over the nature of wealth with all the seriousness of a philosopher who's had a bit too much wine at a party. In his philosophical robes, Aristotle went beyond simple logic and ethics, urging us to think about the deeper ethical implications of our financial situations. Picture him in an olive grove, shaking a stern fist at the gods of profit while contemplating the meaning of ouzo, a Greek alcoholic drink.
Then came the Romans, masters of state intervention in commerce, who took their regulatory fervor to heights that would make modern legal codes blush. Picture a toga-clad senator passionately debating tariffs and subsidies, his voice echoing through the grandeur of the empire that stretched from Hadrian's Wall to the Egyptian sands.
Feudalism, the medieval mic-drop of economic systems, saw lords owning land, serfs tilling it, and knights strutting about as if they owned the realm (which they did). This system was characterized by a rigid hierarchical order, with the king at the top, followed by the nobles, and then the peasants. Stability was garnished with 'know your place,' a phrase that encapsulated the strict social and economic roles of each class. Even the fleas upon peasants held rank, as they were a sign of their proximity to the land and thus their social status.
Guilds, those medieval influencers akin to the inaugural Instagram filters of commerce, were associations of craftsmen and merchants who wielded significant influence over pricing, apprenticeship, and the quality of their crafts. They set standards for the production and sale of goods, ensuring that only high-quality products were available in the market. Yet, behind the veneer of artisanal splendor lurked a shadowy truth: innovation often languished in a dungeon, guarded by guild masters wielding keys fashioned from red tape. The guilds, in their efforts to maintain quality and control competition, often stifled innovation and hindered the growth of new industries.
But hold fast, for the collapse of the Roman Empire cast the economic realm into disarray. The empire's vast trade network, which spanned from Britain to Egypt, crumbled, leading to a significant decline in international trade. This, coupled with the loss of the empire's administrative and legal systems, led to a period of economic stagnation known as the Dark Ages. Trade routes vanished like socks in a dryer, and urbanization embarked on a hiatus as protracted as a knight's quest for the Holy Grail. This was economic inertia with a dash of 'Oops, we forgot to settle the barbarian mercenaries.'
Why does this ancient economic odyssey resonate today, you may wonder? What if I told you it's not just a game of economic Pokémon with our future? The luminaries of yore birthed principles like property rights and contracts that continue to reign over our contemporary financial landscape. The renaissance of commerce in the Middle Ages not only resurrected market days but also heralded the advent of the printing press, an innovation that disseminated knowledge faster than gossip at a royal wedding. This is the thread that connects our past to our present, and understanding it is key to navigating the complexities of our modern financial world.
As we conclude this whirlwind traverse of economic antiquity, remember: studying history isn't just about voyeurism into our forebears' financial foibles. It's about understanding how the decisions of bygone eras reverberate in today's discourse on growth, inequality, and sustainable progress. By learning from their triumphs and turmoils, we can navigate the economic stage with finesse and avoid the blindfolded stumbling of the past. We are not just observers of history but participants in its ongoing narrative.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Imagine this: the ancient Greeks, at the height of their philosophical thinking, pondering over the nature of wealth with all the seriousness of a philosopher who's had a bit too much wine at a party. In his philosophical robes, Aristotle went beyond simple logic and ethics, urging us to think about the deeper ethical implications of our financial situations. Picture him in an olive grove, shaking a stern fist at the gods of profit while contemplating the meaning of ouzo, a Greek alcoholic drink.
Then came the Romans, masters of state intervention in commerce, who took their regulatory fervor to heights that would make modern legal codes blush. Picture a toga-clad senator passionately debating tariffs and subsidies, his voice echoing through the grandeur of the empire that stretched from Hadrian's Wall to the Egyptian sands.
Feudalism, the medieval mic-drop of economic systems, saw lords owning land, serfs tilling it, and knights strutting about as if they owned the realm (which they did). This system was characterized by a rigid hierarchical order, with the king at the top, followed by the nobles, and then the peasants. Stability was garnished with 'know your place,' a phrase that encapsulated the strict social and economic roles of each class. Even the fleas upon peasants held rank, as they were a sign of their proximity to the land and thus their social status.
Guilds, those medieval influencers akin to the inaugural Instagram filters of commerce, were associations of craftsmen and merchants who wielded significant influence over pricing, apprenticeship, and the quality of their crafts. They set standards for the production and sale of goods, ensuring that only high-quality products were available in the market. Yet, behind the veneer of artisanal splendor lurked a shadowy truth: innovation often languished in a dungeon, guarded by guild masters wielding keys fashioned from red tape. The guilds, in their efforts to maintain quality and control competition, often stifled innovation and hindered the growth of new industries.
But hold fast, for the collapse of the Roman Empire cast the economic realm into disarray. The empire's vast trade network, which spanned from Britain to Egypt, crumbled, leading to a significant decline in international trade. This, coupled with the loss of the empire's administrative and legal systems, led to a period of economic stagnation known as the Dark Ages. Trade routes vanished like socks in a dryer, and urbanization embarked on a hiatus as protracted as a knight's quest for the Holy Grail. This was economic inertia with a dash of 'Oops, we forgot to settle the barbarian mercenaries.'
Why does this ancient economic odyssey resonate today, you may wonder? What if I told you it's not just a game of economic Pokémon with our future? The luminaries of yore birthed principles like property rights and contracts that continue to reign over our contemporary financial landscape. The renaissance of commerce in the Middle Ages not only resurrected market days but also heralded the advent of the printing press, an innovation that disseminated knowledge faster than gossip at a royal wedding. This is the thread that connects our past to our present, and understanding it is key to navigating the complexities of our modern financial world.
As we conclude this whirlwind traverse of economic antiquity, remember: studying history isn't just about voyeurism into our forebears' financial foibles. It's about understanding how the decisions of bygone eras reverberate in today's discourse on growth, inequality, and sustainable progress. By learning from their triumphs and turmoils, we can navigate the economic stage with finesse and avoid the blindfolded stumbling of the past. We are not just observers of history but participants in its ongoing narrative.
THE RUNDOWN
- Aristotle's ethical perspectives on wealth influenced early economic thought, emphasizing moral considerations alongside material gain.
- Roman law provided a legal framework that facilitated commerce and economic exchange, influencing future legal systems.
- Feudalism structured economic life with land ownership and labor relationships, promoting stability but limiting social mobility.
- Guilds regulated craftsmanship and trade practices, fostering economic standards and community cohesion.
- Revival of commerce spurred technological innovations like the printing press, accelerating communication and knowledge dissemination.
- Collapse led to economic fragmentation, disrupting trade networks and contributing to prolonged stagnation in parts of Europe.
QUESTIONS
- What factors contributed to the economic fragmentation in Europe following periods of collapse?
- How did the disruption of trade networks contribute to prolonged economic stagnation in certain regions?
- What lessons can be drawn from historical instances of economic collapse and fragmentation for understanding contemporary economic challenges?
#12 Perception is Reality
The enigmatic dance of perception, weaving its intricate tapestry between truth and deception, reality and fantasy. Buckle up, folks, for a rollercoaster journey through the labyrinth of history's funhouse mirrors, where reality wears a mask, and the truth plays hide-and-seek like a mischievous imp.
Let's kick off with a bang, shall we? The Gulf of Tonkin incident is a classic tale of international he-said-she-said. Picture it: 1964, tension fills the air, and suddenly, reports emerge of North Vietnamese attacks on American ships. Cue the suspenseful music, enter stage right, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, handing LBJ the keys to ramp up the Vietnam War faster than you can say, "Hold up, what just happened?" But pause for a moment because after looking it over, those attacks might've been as accurate as a unicorn sighting in Times Square. Perception, my friends, can be as elusive as a politician's sincerity, especially when wrapped in layers of political agenda.
Now, let's shift gears and bask in the glow of the Civil Rights Movement, where perception served not as a tool of manipulation but as a beacon of hope in a sea of injustice. Picture MLK Jr. striding onto the scene, armed with nothing but a dream and impeccable fashion sense, ready to tackle segregation like a pro. It wasn't merely about bus seating arrangements but about flipping the script on centuries of systemic oppression. And guess what? The perception took center stage, transforming collective outrage into legislative victories that rattled the foundations of discrimination. Talk about making lemonade out of lemons.
But the Iraq War is a tale of caution if there ever was one. Remember those WMDs? Weapons of Mass Distraction, more like. Bush and his crew sold us a shiny package that closed our eyes to the truth lurking in the shadows. Turns out, those smoking guns were nothing but smoke and mirrors, leaving behind a wake of devastation even Houdini couldn't escape. Perception, my friends, cuts through reality like a sharp blade with all the finesse of a blindfolded samurai.
And let's not overlook the #MeToo Movement, where perception became the battle cry for the silenced and oppressed. From Hollywood to Main Street, survivors rose, shouting their truths from the rooftops and bringing down industry giants like a human Jenga game. Suddenly, what was once whispered behind closed doors became a rallying cry for change, shaking the very pillars of the status quo. Perception, my friends, can spark a revolution, igniting the fuse on long-overdue reckonings.
But why stop there? Let's dive into the Cuban Missile Crisis, shall we? Two superpowers, locked in a high-stakes game of brinkmanship, each convinced the other was a hair trigger away from pushing the big red button. It was a showdown of epic proportions, a clash of egos and ideologies that held the world in suspense. Yet, amid the bluster and bravado, something miraculous emerged: diplomacy. Kennedy and Khrushchev, two men with the world's fate in their hands, saw through the smoke and mirrors to find common ground. Perception, my friends, can be a pathway to peace if only we're willing to take that leap of faith.
So, what's the takeaway for you? For better or worse, perception molds our reality in ways beyond comprehension. It's a slippery slope, a two-faced coin, a wildcard in life's deck. That's what makes it so darn intriguing.
RUNDOWN
STATE OF THE WORLD
The enigmatic dance of perception, weaving its intricate tapestry between truth and deception, reality and fantasy. Buckle up, folks, for a rollercoaster journey through the labyrinth of history's funhouse mirrors, where reality wears a mask, and the truth plays hide-and-seek like a mischievous imp.
Let's kick off with a bang, shall we? The Gulf of Tonkin incident is a classic tale of international he-said-she-said. Picture it: 1964, tension fills the air, and suddenly, reports emerge of North Vietnamese attacks on American ships. Cue the suspenseful music, enter stage right, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, handing LBJ the keys to ramp up the Vietnam War faster than you can say, "Hold up, what just happened?" But pause for a moment because after looking it over, those attacks might've been as accurate as a unicorn sighting in Times Square. Perception, my friends, can be as elusive as a politician's sincerity, especially when wrapped in layers of political agenda.
Now, let's shift gears and bask in the glow of the Civil Rights Movement, where perception served not as a tool of manipulation but as a beacon of hope in a sea of injustice. Picture MLK Jr. striding onto the scene, armed with nothing but a dream and impeccable fashion sense, ready to tackle segregation like a pro. It wasn't merely about bus seating arrangements but about flipping the script on centuries of systemic oppression. And guess what? The perception took center stage, transforming collective outrage into legislative victories that rattled the foundations of discrimination. Talk about making lemonade out of lemons.
But the Iraq War is a tale of caution if there ever was one. Remember those WMDs? Weapons of Mass Distraction, more like. Bush and his crew sold us a shiny package that closed our eyes to the truth lurking in the shadows. Turns out, those smoking guns were nothing but smoke and mirrors, leaving behind a wake of devastation even Houdini couldn't escape. Perception, my friends, cuts through reality like a sharp blade with all the finesse of a blindfolded samurai.
And let's not overlook the #MeToo Movement, where perception became the battle cry for the silenced and oppressed. From Hollywood to Main Street, survivors rose, shouting their truths from the rooftops and bringing down industry giants like a human Jenga game. Suddenly, what was once whispered behind closed doors became a rallying cry for change, shaking the very pillars of the status quo. Perception, my friends, can spark a revolution, igniting the fuse on long-overdue reckonings.
But why stop there? Let's dive into the Cuban Missile Crisis, shall we? Two superpowers, locked in a high-stakes game of brinkmanship, each convinced the other was a hair trigger away from pushing the big red button. It was a showdown of epic proportions, a clash of egos and ideologies that held the world in suspense. Yet, amid the bluster and bravado, something miraculous emerged: diplomacy. Kennedy and Khrushchev, two men with the world's fate in their hands, saw through the smoke and mirrors to find common ground. Perception, my friends, can be a pathway to peace if only we're willing to take that leap of faith.
So, what's the takeaway for you? For better or worse, perception molds our reality in ways beyond comprehension. It's a slippery slope, a two-faced coin, a wildcard in life's deck. That's what makes it so darn intriguing.
RUNDOWN
- The Gulf of Tonkin incident during the Vietnam War shows how false stories can lead to big decisions.
- The Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s proves that when people see unfairness, they can make changes together.
- The Iraq War teaches us the danger of believing wrong information, like about weapons that weren't there.
- The #MeToo Movement, starting in 2017, helped people speak out about sexual harassment, making a difference.
- Winners often control how we see history, so it's important to think about different viewpoints.
- Learning about perception in history helps us understand truth from lies, especially in today's world of lots of information.
STATE OF THE WORLD
World Map, 594 BCE
In 594 BCE, our world was a significant tapestry of ambitious city-states, burgeoning empires, and a sprawling pantheon of gods. Greece, a pivotal player, emerged from its Dark Ages, with Athens and Sparta strutting onto the stage like stars at a high-stakes toga party. Meanwhile, Babylon, a cornerstone of civilization, asserted dominance in Mesopotamia under Nebuchadnezzar II's Neo-Babylonian Empire, flaunting architectural marvels and bold declarations. Under Psamtik I, Egypt, a cultural touchstone, navigated a transitional phase before the rise of Persia and Cyrus the Great, who would soon dominate ancient discourse. Religion, a guiding force, thrived with polytheism reigning supreme, offering deities for every facet of life, though divine intervention often seemed as sporadic as ancient Wi-Fi. Technological advancements, a turning point, saw iron replacing bronze while writing became essential for tracking debts and dynasties. Trade, a catalyst for change, flourished amidst bustling cities, cultural exchanges, and petty political debates reminiscent of a proto-United nation. Philosophy, a beacon of thought, blossomed with early Greek thinkers pondering existence and the fashion faux pas of socks with sandals, while science, a seed of knowledge, tentatively emerged amidst the shadows of astrology. Thus, 594 BCE marked a pivotal era of transition, innovation, and divine intrigue—a tapestry of ancient civilization gradually unfolding with each unfurled papyrus scroll, shaping the world we live in today.
HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
The Reading section—a realm where our aspirations of enlightenment often clash with the harsh realities of procrastination and the desperate reliance on Google. We soldier on through dense texts, promised 'broadening perspectives' but often wrestling with existential dread and academic pressure. With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a strong cup of coffee, I'll be your guide on this wild journey from dusty tomes to the murky depths of postmodernism. In the midst of all the pretentious prose, there's a glimmer of insight: we're all in this together, united in our struggle to survive without losing our sanity.
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
READING
- Chapter 12. Faith, Fortune, and Fame: European Expansion, 1450-1700
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
- Early 16th-century Western culture expanded beyond Europe.
- Europeans explored and settled in newfound lands, establishing trading posts in the East.
- Merchants and entrepreneurs followed explorers, driven by economic opportunity.
- The growth of commercial capitalism and new banking techniques were stimulated.
- Some governments set economic policies to control money flow.
- This era saw unprecedented movement of peoples and cultural confrontations.
- Europeans generated enormous wealth but also widespread misery.
- Native populations were decimated by warfare, disease, and abuse.
- Hundreds of thousands of Africans were enslaved and forcibly taken from their homelands.
- The blending of peoples, ideas, and goods affected the entire world and spurred further European exploration and conquest.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... The forced service of seamen led to a riot against impressment in Boston in 1747. Then crowds turned against Thomas Hutchinson, a rich merchant and colonial official who had backed the governor in putting down the riot, and who also designed a currency plan for Massachusetts which seemed to discriminate against the poor. Hutchinson's house burned down, mysteriously, and a crowd gathered in the street, cursing Hutchinson and shouting, 'Let it burn!'
By the years of the Revolutionary crisis, the 1760s, the wealthy elite that controlled the British colonies on the American mainland had 150 years of experience, had learned certain things about how to rule. They had various fears, but also had developed tactics to deal with what they feared.
The Indians, they had found, were too unruly to keep as a labor force, and remained an obstacle to expansion. Black slaves were easier to control, and their profitability for southern plantations was bringing an enormous increase in the importation of slaves, who were becoming a majority in some colonies and constituted one-fifth of the entire colonial population. But the blacks were not totally submissive, and as their numbers grew, the prospect of slave rebellion grew..."
"... The forced service of seamen led to a riot against impressment in Boston in 1747. Then crowds turned against Thomas Hutchinson, a rich merchant and colonial official who had backed the governor in putting down the riot, and who also designed a currency plan for Massachusetts which seemed to discriminate against the poor. Hutchinson's house burned down, mysteriously, and a crowd gathered in the street, cursing Hutchinson and shouting, 'Let it burn!'
By the years of the Revolutionary crisis, the 1760s, the wealthy elite that controlled the British colonies on the American mainland had 150 years of experience, had learned certain things about how to rule. They had various fears, but also had developed tactics to deal with what they feared.
The Indians, they had found, were too unruly to keep as a labor force, and remained an obstacle to expansion. Black slaves were easier to control, and their profitability for southern plantations was bringing an enormous increase in the importation of slaves, who were becoming a majority in some colonies and constituted one-fifth of the entire colonial population. But the blacks were not totally submissive, and as their numbers grew, the prospect of slave rebellion grew..."
Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
... Despite lower rates, opposition arose over the new enforcement mechanisms, including the referral of all smuggling cases to admiralty courts that had judges instead of juries, which normally handled such cases. Any colonial smuggler knew that the outcome of such a trial was less often in his favor, and complaints arose that the likelihood of real prosecution and conviction was higher under the new law. A second law, the Currency Act of 1764, prohibited the colonies from issuing paper money. When combined with the taxes of the Sugar Act, colonists anticipated that the Currency Act would drain the already scarce metallic money (specie, or gold and silver coins) from America, rendering merchants helpless to counteract inflation that always followed higher taxes.
By 1764, then, colonists drew a direct correlation between paying taxes and governing, and between government intervention in the economy and inflation. A few early taxes had existed on land, but land ownership conferred voting status. Other than that, only a handful of other direct taxes were levied, especially in light of the small size and limited power of government. 'The more revenue governments had, the more mischief they could create,' was the prevailing colonial view. In sharp contrast to land taxes, Grenville’s new duties were in no way associated with rights, and all subjects—landowners or otherwise—now had to pay..."
... Despite lower rates, opposition arose over the new enforcement mechanisms, including the referral of all smuggling cases to admiralty courts that had judges instead of juries, which normally handled such cases. Any colonial smuggler knew that the outcome of such a trial was less often in his favor, and complaints arose that the likelihood of real prosecution and conviction was higher under the new law. A second law, the Currency Act of 1764, prohibited the colonies from issuing paper money. When combined with the taxes of the Sugar Act, colonists anticipated that the Currency Act would drain the already scarce metallic money (specie, or gold and silver coins) from America, rendering merchants helpless to counteract inflation that always followed higher taxes.
By 1764, then, colonists drew a direct correlation between paying taxes and governing, and between government intervention in the economy and inflation. A few early taxes had existed on land, but land ownership conferred voting status. Other than that, only a handful of other direct taxes were levied, especially in light of the small size and limited power of government. 'The more revenue governments had, the more mischief they could create,' was the prevailing colonial view. In sharp contrast to land taxes, Grenville’s new duties were in no way associated with rights, and all subjects—landowners or otherwise—now had to pay..."
Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
"... Two days after taking office, Roosevelt, invoking a “national emergency,” took an unprecedented step toward autocratic power. For the first time in United States history, a president closed the nation’s banks. Then, on March 9, Congress transferred much of its power to the president and gave him sole authority over a large swath of the nation’s economy. The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was amended to declare that during time of war “or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and exporting, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency.” Congress effectively gave the president unchecked control over banks and financial transactions in general, and everything concerning gold in particular. More ominously, the new law allowed the president to alone decide when to acquire and exercise that power..."
"... Two days after taking office, Roosevelt, invoking a “national emergency,” took an unprecedented step toward autocratic power. For the first time in United States history, a president closed the nation’s banks. Then, on March 9, Congress transferred much of its power to the president and gave him sole authority over a large swath of the nation’s economy. The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was amended to declare that during time of war “or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and exporting, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency.” Congress effectively gave the president unchecked control over banks and financial transactions in general, and everything concerning gold in particular. More ominously, the new law allowed the president to alone decide when to acquire and exercise that power..."
Imagine, if you will, the ancient Greeks and Romans—those trendsetting toga enthusiasts—were more than just purveyors of democracy and epic poetry. They were savvy players in the bustling Mediterranean marketplace. Like an Instagram influencer avant la lettre, Athens flaunted its economic prowess through maritime trade and tributary relationships within the Delian League. It wasn't merely about amassing wealth in drachmas; it was a display of cultural and political clout. Picture Athens as that haughty artisanal café where intellectuals sip olive oil and debate the finer points of world domination. These ancient economic structures and events, seemingly distant, hold a mirror to our modern economic debates, reminding us of the enduring relevance of history.
But let's not forget the cautionary tales that history weaves. Consider the decline of the Roman Empire, once a pinnacle of power, now unraveling due to fiscal mismanagement, the lingering effects of slave labor, and the intrusion of barbarian gate-crashers. It's like witnessing a grand soirée dissolve into chaos because someone neglected to settle the DJ's bill. This grandeur and downfall of the Roman Empire serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of even the mightiest entities, urging us to be vigilant and thoughtful in our economic stewardship.
Fast-forward to medieval Europe, where feudal lords reigned like rock stars of land ownership, presiding over extensive estates with serfs as their loyal entourage. Feudalism transcended being a mere economic structure; it evolved into a way of life, complete with power struggles and hierarchical intricacies tighter than the armor of a jousting knight. Feudal lords played a crucial role in the economic structure of the time, as they controlled the land and resources, and their serfs provided labor in exchange for protection. Picture feudalism as a medieval LinkedIn—your profile is only as formidable as your fiefdom.
Now, let's turn our attention to the intellectuals of the age. That venerable philosopher, Aristotle, wasn't just meditating on robes and sandals. He was dropping profound truths on economics, pondering the ethical implications of wealth and the appropriate role of the state in economic affairs. Aristotle's economic theories, such as his views on wealth distribution and the role of the state in the economy, are still relevant today and have influenced modern economic thought. He foresaw the future Twitter debates on wealth distribution long before hashtags were even a thing.
And what about the medieval guilds? They were akin to the original trade unions crossed with clandestine societies. These guilds played a significant role in the economic prosperity of the time, as they regulated trade, set standards for craftsmanship, and protected the interests of their members. They weren't solely concerned with ensuring your sword was the sharpest; they safeguarded craftsmanship, holding the keys to economic prosperity as securely as a sealed Hogwarts acceptance letter. Innovation? They were as resistant to change as a castle gate during a siege. The guilds' resistance to change and their focus on maintaining high standards of craftsmanship can be seen as both a strength and a weakness, and their role in the economy is still debated today.
So, what's the grand takeaway from this rollercoaster ride through history? Beyond the revelry of toga parties, it's that history isn't merely a dusty chronicle; it's a guidebook of monumental blunders and occasional strokes of brilliance. Understanding where we stumbled and where we soared offers invaluable insights into today's economic circus. Whether grappling with debates on wealth redistribution or the ethical ramifications of governmental interference, these ancient narratives furnish a veritable banquet of lessons. They remind us that economic foresight and stewardship are not just important, but paramount, even amid flying chariots and medieval equivalents of beachwear. They empower us to shape our economic future with wisdom and prudence.
Thus, when contemplating the state of the global economy, remember this: behind every currency crisis or feudal feud lies a tale as bizarre and amusing as any medieval Tinder mishap. For history isn't solely about our past; it illuminates the journey taken, the figures trodden upon, and the compelling reasons to pay heed in history class. So, the next time you're in an economics debate, feel free to drop a historical fact or two. It might just make you the life of the party.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
But let's not forget the cautionary tales that history weaves. Consider the decline of the Roman Empire, once a pinnacle of power, now unraveling due to fiscal mismanagement, the lingering effects of slave labor, and the intrusion of barbarian gate-crashers. It's like witnessing a grand soirée dissolve into chaos because someone neglected to settle the DJ's bill. This grandeur and downfall of the Roman Empire serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of even the mightiest entities, urging us to be vigilant and thoughtful in our economic stewardship.
Fast-forward to medieval Europe, where feudal lords reigned like rock stars of land ownership, presiding over extensive estates with serfs as their loyal entourage. Feudalism transcended being a mere economic structure; it evolved into a way of life, complete with power struggles and hierarchical intricacies tighter than the armor of a jousting knight. Feudal lords played a crucial role in the economic structure of the time, as they controlled the land and resources, and their serfs provided labor in exchange for protection. Picture feudalism as a medieval LinkedIn—your profile is only as formidable as your fiefdom.
Now, let's turn our attention to the intellectuals of the age. That venerable philosopher, Aristotle, wasn't just meditating on robes and sandals. He was dropping profound truths on economics, pondering the ethical implications of wealth and the appropriate role of the state in economic affairs. Aristotle's economic theories, such as his views on wealth distribution and the role of the state in the economy, are still relevant today and have influenced modern economic thought. He foresaw the future Twitter debates on wealth distribution long before hashtags were even a thing.
And what about the medieval guilds? They were akin to the original trade unions crossed with clandestine societies. These guilds played a significant role in the economic prosperity of the time, as they regulated trade, set standards for craftsmanship, and protected the interests of their members. They weren't solely concerned with ensuring your sword was the sharpest; they safeguarded craftsmanship, holding the keys to economic prosperity as securely as a sealed Hogwarts acceptance letter. Innovation? They were as resistant to change as a castle gate during a siege. The guilds' resistance to change and their focus on maintaining high standards of craftsmanship can be seen as both a strength and a weakness, and their role in the economy is still debated today.
So, what's the grand takeaway from this rollercoaster ride through history? Beyond the revelry of toga parties, it's that history isn't merely a dusty chronicle; it's a guidebook of monumental blunders and occasional strokes of brilliance. Understanding where we stumbled and where we soared offers invaluable insights into today's economic circus. Whether grappling with debates on wealth redistribution or the ethical ramifications of governmental interference, these ancient narratives furnish a veritable banquet of lessons. They remind us that economic foresight and stewardship are not just important, but paramount, even amid flying chariots and medieval equivalents of beachwear. They empower us to shape our economic future with wisdom and prudence.
Thus, when contemplating the state of the global economy, remember this: behind every currency crisis or feudal feud lies a tale as bizarre and amusing as any medieval Tinder mishap. For history isn't solely about our past; it illuminates the journey taken, the figures trodden upon, and the compelling reasons to pay heed in history class. So, the next time you're in an economics debate, feel free to drop a historical fact or two. It might just make you the life of the party.
THE RUNDOWN
- Riot in Boston over impressment of seamen led by Thomas Hutchinson, resulting in public backlash against discriminatory currency plans and Hutchinson's house burning down.
- Wealthy elite in American colonies used strategies to control, viewing Native Americans as rebellious and slaves as manageable despite fears of uprising.
- Colonists opposed British enforcement measures like admiralty courts and the Currency Act, fearing economic instability from increased taxes and currency restrictions.
- President Roosevelt assumed broad control over economy during national emergency, closing banks and regulating financial transactions to combat the Great Depression.
- Established extensive trade networks promoting economic growth and cultural exchange, exemplified by Athens' prosperity through maritime trade and tributes.
- Feudalism in Western Europe structured around land ownership and agriculture, shaping societal hierarchies and economic relations through feudal lords and serfs.
QUESTIONS
- In what ways did land ownership under feudalism determine power and status in medieval European society?
- How did agricultural practices and obligations under feudalism influence the daily lives of serfs and peasants?
- What were the primary factors that led to the decline of feudalism and the transition to more modern economic systems in Western Europe?
Where and how did the ancient Greeks gain the wealth with which to build a culture that became central to the modern world? Photo by De Agostini / G. Dagli Ort / Getty Images.
Prepare to be transported into the captivating realm of historical films and videos. Brace yourselves for a mind-bending odyssey through time as we embark on a cinematic expedition. Within these flickering frames, the past morphs into a vivid tapestry of triumphs, tragedies, and transformative moments that have shaped the very fabric of our existence. We shall immerse ourselves in a whirlwind of visual narratives, dissecting the nuances of artistic interpretations, examining the storytelling techniques, and voraciously devouring historical accuracy with the ferocity of a time-traveling historian. So strap in, hold tight, and prepare to have your perception of history forever shattered by the mesmerizing lens of the camera.
THE RUNDOWN
The Hanseatic League, a medieval merchant consortium, was not just a trading network but a transformative force that turned Northern Europe into its commercial playground. It was a masterstroke of German-speaking traders, the original influencers, who crafted a sprawling economic empire from Tallinn's icy shores to the bustling markets of Cologne. Their influence was not limited to goods; they disseminated an entire civilization. Lübeck, the prima donna of this operatic saga, rose to prominence in the mid-12th century, becoming a Free Imperial City in 1226. This was not just any city but the shining jewel in the Hanseatic crown, where deals were brokered and fortunes forged. The League's power lay in its unique structure – local councils, regional assemblies, and the formidable Hansetag presiding over all. Imagine a medieval United Nations with more herring and fewer tedious speeches. These merchants were masters of diplomacy and economic warfare, as seen in their altercation with Denmark in the late 14th century. When trade negotiations hit a snag, the Hanseatic League didn't sulk; they went to war, securing trade privileges and asserting their dominance.
Their trading posts, or Kontore, were the nerve centers – Novgorod, London, Bergen, and Bruges. Each was a bustling hub where the East's raw materials – furs and wax – were exchanged for the West's finest goods and luxuries. These weren't just merchants but maestros of exchange, conducting a symphony of trade across the seas. But every empire has its twilight. By 1500, Dutch and English traders, brash newcomers with a taste for adventure and profit, began muscling in. The once-mighty League started to unravel. By its final meeting in 1669, the grandeur had dimmed – a mere nine members attended, a shadow of its former glory. The curtain finally descended in 1862, with Bremen, Hamburg, and Lübeck standing as the last remnants of this mercantile epic. So there you have it, the Hanseatic League – a tale of trade, triumph, and eventual decline, recounted with a wink and a nod. But their legacy? It's a vibrant tapestry of markets and maritime might, a testament to what transpires when commerce meets conquest in the medieval world, and a lasting influence that still resonates today.
The Hanseatic League, a medieval merchant consortium, was not just a trading network but a transformative force that turned Northern Europe into its commercial playground. It was a masterstroke of German-speaking traders, the original influencers, who crafted a sprawling economic empire from Tallinn's icy shores to the bustling markets of Cologne. Their influence was not limited to goods; they disseminated an entire civilization. Lübeck, the prima donna of this operatic saga, rose to prominence in the mid-12th century, becoming a Free Imperial City in 1226. This was not just any city but the shining jewel in the Hanseatic crown, where deals were brokered and fortunes forged. The League's power lay in its unique structure – local councils, regional assemblies, and the formidable Hansetag presiding over all. Imagine a medieval United Nations with more herring and fewer tedious speeches. These merchants were masters of diplomacy and economic warfare, as seen in their altercation with Denmark in the late 14th century. When trade negotiations hit a snag, the Hanseatic League didn't sulk; they went to war, securing trade privileges and asserting their dominance.
Their trading posts, or Kontore, were the nerve centers – Novgorod, London, Bergen, and Bruges. Each was a bustling hub where the East's raw materials – furs and wax – were exchanged for the West's finest goods and luxuries. These weren't just merchants but maestros of exchange, conducting a symphony of trade across the seas. But every empire has its twilight. By 1500, Dutch and English traders, brash newcomers with a taste for adventure and profit, began muscling in. The once-mighty League started to unravel. By its final meeting in 1669, the grandeur had dimmed – a mere nine members attended, a shadow of its former glory. The curtain finally descended in 1862, with Bremen, Hamburg, and Lübeck standing as the last remnants of this mercantile epic. So there you have it, the Hanseatic League – a tale of trade, triumph, and eventual decline, recounted with a wink and a nod. But their legacy? It's a vibrant tapestry of markets and maritime might, a testament to what transpires when commerce meets conquest in the medieval world, and a lasting influence that still resonates today.
Welcome to the mind-bending Key Terms extravaganza of our history class learning module. Brace yourselves; we will unravel the cryptic codes, secret handshakes, and linguistic labyrinths that make up the twisted tapestry of historical knowledge. These key terms are the Rosetta Stones of our academic journey, the skeleton keys to unlocking the enigmatic doors of comprehension. They're like historical Swiss Army knives, equipped with blades of definition and corkscrews of contextual examples, ready to pierce through the fog of confusion and liberate your intellectual curiosity. By harnessing the power of these mighty key terms, you'll possess the superhuman ability to traverse the treacherous terrains of primary sources, surf the tumultuous waves of academic texts, and engage in epic battles of historical debate. The past awaits, and the key terms are keys to unlocking its dazzling secrets.
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
- 594 BCE: Reforms of Solon
- 509 BCE: Roman Economic Policies
- 336 BCE: Alexander the Great and Economics
- 287 BCE: Lex Hortensia
- 212 CE: Edict of Caracalla
- 622 CE: Hijra of Muhammad and Economics
- 962 CE: Holy Roman Emperor and Economics
- 1066 CE: The Domesday Book
- 1096 CE: The Crusades and Economic Relations
- 1177 CE: Battle of Montgisard and Economic Activities
- 1215 CE: Magna Carta and Economics
- 1256 CE: Sorbonne University and Economics
- 1271 CE: Marco Polo and the Silk Road
- 1295 CE: Model Parliament and Economic Governance
- 1297 CE: Swiss Confederation and Economic Cooperation
- 1397 CE: Union of Kalmar
- 1453 CE: Fall of Constantinople and Byzantine Trade Routes
- 1477 CE: Burgundian Wars
- 1492 CE: The Columbian Exchange and Transforming Global Trade
- 1494 CE: Treaty of Tordesillas
DISCLAIMER: Welcome scholars to the wild and wacky world of history class. This isn't your granddaddy's boring ol' lecture, baby. We will take a trip through time, which will be one wild ride. I know some of you are in a brick-and-mortar setting, while others are in the vast digital wasteland. But fear not; we're all in this together. Online students might miss out on some in-person interaction, but you can still join in on the fun. This little shindig aims to get you all engaged with the course material and understand how past societies have shaped the world we know today. We'll talk about revolutions, wars, and other crazy stuff. So get ready, kids, because it's going to be one heck of a trip. And for all, you online students out there, don't be shy. Please share your thoughts and ideas with the rest of us. The Professor will do his best to give everyone an equal opportunity to learn, so don't hold back. So, let's do this thing!
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Objective:
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Objective:
Activity #2: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for the pièce de résistance of this classroom module - the summary section. As we embark on this tantalizing journey, we'll savor the exquisite flavors of knowledge, highlighting the fundamental ingredients and spices that have seasoned our minds throughout these captivating lessons. Prepare to indulge in a savory recap that will leave your intellectual taste buds tingling, serving as a passport to further enlightenment.
In economic history, one encounters a rich tapestry woven with strands of intrigue, ethical introspection, and occasional flashes of brilliant disorder. Can you imagine ancient sages, their beards stroked in contemplation, pondering the moral problems of wealth accumulation? Consider Aristotle, who introduced the idea that the pursuit of riches should be balanced with virtue—a concept that shaped centuries of economic discourse and moral contemplation. What other intriguing ideas and figures might we uncover in this historical journey?
Step onto the stage: Roman Law, a bastion of bureaucratic order. Here, Emperor Justinian I assumes the role of a legal virtuoso, meticulously codifying contracts, property rights, and commerce into the esteemed Corpus Juris Civilis. This legal mosaic didn't just shape the foundations of 'civilization', it transformed the very fabric of our society. It ensured that every pact among Roman citizens was not merely a casual agreement but a solemn covenant set in legal stone. It's not just a benchmark, it's a cornerstone of our legal system!
Feudalism, a grand stage of medieval societal structure, unfolds like a theater production. Lords distribute lands like confectionery at a parade in return for loyalty and occasional military service. Meanwhile, peasants work the land, dreaming of a future where social mobility extends beyond fleeting glimpses of noble lineage at seasonal celebrations. In the midst of political upheaval, feudalism offered stability—a realm where order prevailed, albeit under the constant threat of the Black Death, ready to disrupt the status quo.
Amidst this feudal pageantry, guilds emerged as Renaissance celebrities of regulation. Artisans and merchants united not solely to vend their wares but to establish golden benchmarks of quality and fairness. Consider the Hanseatic League—a motley alliance of northern European cities orchestrating trade agreements akin to gossip-swapping rumors at a royal soiree. Think of it as the original LinkedIn, seamlessly connecting artisans and merchants with the efficiency of medieval courier services.
And then, the Renaissance! A convergence of art, science, and finance, a cultural feast hosted by the illustrious Medici clan. These patrons of progress were not just bankers but architects of an era, funding everything from Botticelli's brushstrokes to Leonardo's groundbreaking inventions. And who could forget Gutenberg and his printing press—a revolutionary creation that turned monks into publishing tycoons and made 'bestseller' a common term?
Yet, lest we wander too deep into trance, recall the Crisis of the Late Middle Ages—a sad chapter where the Black Death gatecrashed with famine, death, and economic desolation in tow. A grim reminder that prosperity's veneer can swiftly crumble, turning bustling markets into eerie ghost towns in the blink of an eye.
Why resurrect these age-old chronicles? Understanding our historical path illuminates the perils of retracing medieval missteps. These economic sagas—ethical quandaries, legal acumen, and societal dynamics—have etched the very bedrock of Western civilization. They underpin our reliance on contracts over mere nods and grunts and prompt earnest debates on corporate ethics amid indulgence in artisanal cheese platters at networking gatherings.
or, in other words:
Step onto the stage: Roman Law, a bastion of bureaucratic order. Here, Emperor Justinian I assumes the role of a legal virtuoso, meticulously codifying contracts, property rights, and commerce into the esteemed Corpus Juris Civilis. This legal mosaic didn't just shape the foundations of 'civilization', it transformed the very fabric of our society. It ensured that every pact among Roman citizens was not merely a casual agreement but a solemn covenant set in legal stone. It's not just a benchmark, it's a cornerstone of our legal system!
Feudalism, a grand stage of medieval societal structure, unfolds like a theater production. Lords distribute lands like confectionery at a parade in return for loyalty and occasional military service. Meanwhile, peasants work the land, dreaming of a future where social mobility extends beyond fleeting glimpses of noble lineage at seasonal celebrations. In the midst of political upheaval, feudalism offered stability—a realm where order prevailed, albeit under the constant threat of the Black Death, ready to disrupt the status quo.
Amidst this feudal pageantry, guilds emerged as Renaissance celebrities of regulation. Artisans and merchants united not solely to vend their wares but to establish golden benchmarks of quality and fairness. Consider the Hanseatic League—a motley alliance of northern European cities orchestrating trade agreements akin to gossip-swapping rumors at a royal soiree. Think of it as the original LinkedIn, seamlessly connecting artisans and merchants with the efficiency of medieval courier services.
And then, the Renaissance! A convergence of art, science, and finance, a cultural feast hosted by the illustrious Medici clan. These patrons of progress were not just bankers but architects of an era, funding everything from Botticelli's brushstrokes to Leonardo's groundbreaking inventions. And who could forget Gutenberg and his printing press—a revolutionary creation that turned monks into publishing tycoons and made 'bestseller' a common term?
Yet, lest we wander too deep into trance, recall the Crisis of the Late Middle Ages—a sad chapter where the Black Death gatecrashed with famine, death, and economic desolation in tow. A grim reminder that prosperity's veneer can swiftly crumble, turning bustling markets into eerie ghost towns in the blink of an eye.
Why resurrect these age-old chronicles? Understanding our historical path illuminates the perils of retracing medieval missteps. These economic sagas—ethical quandaries, legal acumen, and societal dynamics—have etched the very bedrock of Western civilization. They underpin our reliance on contracts over mere nods and grunts and prompt earnest debates on corporate ethics amid indulgence in artisanal cheese platters at networking gatherings.
or, in other words:
- Aristotle's ethical views on wealth (4th century BCE) integrated moral considerations into economics, influencing later thinkers like Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century.
- Roman Law (6th century CE) provided legal foundations for commerce and property rights, crucially shaping legal systems across Europe.
- Feudalism (9th to 15th centuries) structured society around land ownership and hierarchical relationships, fostering stability but limiting social mobility.
- Guilds (12th to 16th centuries) regulated trade and craftsmanship, promoting economic standards and community cohesion, exemplified by the Hanseatic League.
- The Renaissance revival of commerce (14th to 16th centuries) spurred technological innovations like the printing press, accelerating communication and economic growth.
- Economic collapses, such as the Crisis of the Late Middle Ages (14th century), disrupted trade networks and caused prolonged stagnation, highlighting vulnerabilities in pre-modern economies.
ASSIGNMENTS
Forum Discussion #013
- Forum Discussion #13
- Quiz #4
Forum Discussion #013
The Art of Being Human is a channel dedicated to exploring and understanding the rich tapestry of human civilization through engaging and informative content on history, literature, philosophy, art, culture, and more. Watch the following:
Please answer the following question:
Imagine you are living in ancient Rome during Emperor Tiberius's reign when a major financial crisis struck in 33 CE. Based on what you've learned about this crisis and modern financial downturns like the 2007-2008 global recession, discuss the similarities and differences between these events. How might the Roman government's response to their crisis compare to actions taken by governments during more recent economic downturns? Which crisis do you think had a greater impact on society, and why? Support your answer with specific details from both historical and modern contexts.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
In 33 CE, the Roman Empire was entangled in a surreal financial dilemma that could have sprung from a playwright's tipsy imagination. Under Emperor Tiberius, who favored Capri's cliffs over Rome's bustle, an ancient law revived from Julius Caesar's archives brought chaos: lenders tied fortunes to Italian soil, triggering abrupt loan recalls and drying up credit faster than a Roman toga in a downpour. As Sejanus met a grim fate in 31 CE, triggering a financial collapse that toppled banks like dominoes, Tiberius's government intervened with a staggering 100 million sesterces in interest-free loans secured by land. Caligula's lavish spending upon his ascent in 37 CE bled the Empire's coffers, though commerce revived. Chroniclers Tacitus and Suetonius, with their vivid and dramatic descriptions, captured this saga, echoing modern parallels in economic crises. Ultimately, Rome's tumultuous saga underscored the perils of ancient laws, the ambitions of men, and the enduring dance between economic folly and governmental rescue, its citizens resilient amid history's unwritten chaos.
Imagine you are living in ancient Rome during Emperor Tiberius's reign when a major financial crisis struck in 33 CE. Based on what you've learned about this crisis and modern financial downturns like the 2007-2008 global recession, discuss the similarities and differences between these events. How might the Roman government's response to their crisis compare to actions taken by governments during more recent economic downturns? Which crisis do you think had a greater impact on society, and why? Support your answer with specific details from both historical and modern contexts.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
In 33 CE, the Roman Empire was entangled in a surreal financial dilemma that could have sprung from a playwright's tipsy imagination. Under Emperor Tiberius, who favored Capri's cliffs over Rome's bustle, an ancient law revived from Julius Caesar's archives brought chaos: lenders tied fortunes to Italian soil, triggering abrupt loan recalls and drying up credit faster than a Roman toga in a downpour. As Sejanus met a grim fate in 31 CE, triggering a financial collapse that toppled banks like dominoes, Tiberius's government intervened with a staggering 100 million sesterces in interest-free loans secured by land. Caligula's lavish spending upon his ascent in 37 CE bled the Empire's coffers, though commerce revived. Chroniclers Tacitus and Suetonius, with their vivid and dramatic descriptions, captured this saga, echoing modern parallels in economic crises. Ultimately, Rome's tumultuous saga underscored the perils of ancient laws, the ambitions of men, and the enduring dance between economic folly and governmental rescue, its citizens resilient amid history's unwritten chaos.
Hey, welcome to the work cited section! Here's where you'll find all the heavy hitters that inspired the content you've just consumed. Some might think citations are as dull as unbuttered toast, but nothing gets my intellectual juices flowing like a good reference list. Don't get me wrong, just because we've cited a source; doesn't mean we're always going to see eye-to-eye. But that's the beauty of it - it's up to you to chew on the material and come to conclusions. Listen, we've gone to great lengths to ensure these citations are accurate, but let's face it, we're all human. So, give us a holler if you notice any mistakes or suggest more sources. We're always looking to up our game. Ultimately, it's all about pursuing knowledge and truth.
Work Cited:
Work Cited:
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Disclaimer: This learning module was primarily created by the professor with the assistance of AI technology. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, please note that the AI's contribution was limited to some regions of the module. The professor takes full responsibility for the content of this module and any errors or omissions therein. This module is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice or consultation. The professor and AI cannot be held responsible for any consequences arising from using this module.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.