Module Thirteen: Giggles and Galileo
In a bygone era of toga chic and heated debates over stargazers versus chicken bones for medical counsel, Western civilization stumbled into what we now dub the pre-1500 CE muddle. This period was not merely an epoch of mead chugging and facial hair contemplation; it forged the precarious groundwork for today's scientific and societal landscapes.
Imagine ancient Greeks, draped in togas, discussing whether the cosmos resembled LEGO bricks or more profound constructs. The original biologist, Aristotle, offered profound insights into nature, albeit steeped in armchair philosophizing rather than hands-on fieldwork. He developed the theory of the Four Elements, which stated that all matter was composed of Earth, air, fire, and water. Picture him as the pioneer influencer of science, dropping theories like trending hashtags destined to echo for centuries.
Meanwhile, Pythagoras, enamored with triangles and harmonious mathematics, inadvertently birthed a cult of followers who would debate his eponymous theorem over flatbread and olive oil for centuries.
But hold on, there's more! The Greeks weren't all about geometric proofs and toga-clad symposiums; they also revolutionized medicine with Hippocrates, whose enduring oath, known as the 'Hippocratic Oath ', implores doctors still today to observe more and speculate less. This oath, essentially a code of ethics for medical practitioners, boiled down to: 'Quit licking toads; start diagnosing them!'
However, it wasn't all laurels and learning. Enter the Church, perennially poised to rain on any parade with its disdain for progressive ideas that challenged established celestial bestsellers. Galileo's heliocentric musings? Those earned him a coveted front-row seat at the Inquisition's elite gathering, with plush thumbscrews and a stern rebuke for spoiling the 'geocentric buzz ', the widely accepted belief that the Earth was the center of the universe.
Skipping through the Dark Ages and their medieval mixtape, where knowledge languished like a pub crawl hangover, the decline of the Roman Empire signaled more than the demise of a favored scroll supplier. It led to a fragmentation of knowledge and a dearth of scribes, which meant that scholars had to barter away scientific revelations for goat cheese, leading to a significant setback in the progress of science.
Fear not, intrepid reader, for amidst this tapestry of togas and tumult lay the crucible of modern science. From Euclid's "Elements", which laid the foundation for geometry, to Ptolemy's cosmic gossip columns, which provided the first comprehensive model of the universe, these ancient minds laid down the laws of the universe quicker than you could cry "Eureka!" Their endeavors were not mere guesswork but rather a systematic journey of experimentation, observation, and deduction, resonating through the annals of time.
Today, these venerable scholars might gaze upon our climate quandaries and cloning curiosities with a wry smile. They would remind us that their work, far from being confined to the dusty annals of history, continues to shape our world. They would remind us that science transcends mere beaker juggling; it's about questioning conventions and occasionally dodging ecclesiastical scrutiny.
As we peruse the annals of history, let us raise a glass to these pioneers, blemishes and all. Their tribulations, triumphs, and questionable fashion choices paved the road to a scientific revolution that birthed marvels like WiFi and microwave burritos. Whether you're a scholar or a curious cat browsing the annals, their unique contributions remind us that the oddest journeys often yield the most illuminating discoveries.
And who's to say the next great leap in science won't come from someone pondering the cosmos in pajamas, sipping coffee, and wondering what Aristotle might tweet about quantum mechanics?
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Imagine ancient Greeks, draped in togas, discussing whether the cosmos resembled LEGO bricks or more profound constructs. The original biologist, Aristotle, offered profound insights into nature, albeit steeped in armchair philosophizing rather than hands-on fieldwork. He developed the theory of the Four Elements, which stated that all matter was composed of Earth, air, fire, and water. Picture him as the pioneer influencer of science, dropping theories like trending hashtags destined to echo for centuries.
Meanwhile, Pythagoras, enamored with triangles and harmonious mathematics, inadvertently birthed a cult of followers who would debate his eponymous theorem over flatbread and olive oil for centuries.
But hold on, there's more! The Greeks weren't all about geometric proofs and toga-clad symposiums; they also revolutionized medicine with Hippocrates, whose enduring oath, known as the 'Hippocratic Oath ', implores doctors still today to observe more and speculate less. This oath, essentially a code of ethics for medical practitioners, boiled down to: 'Quit licking toads; start diagnosing them!'
However, it wasn't all laurels and learning. Enter the Church, perennially poised to rain on any parade with its disdain for progressive ideas that challenged established celestial bestsellers. Galileo's heliocentric musings? Those earned him a coveted front-row seat at the Inquisition's elite gathering, with plush thumbscrews and a stern rebuke for spoiling the 'geocentric buzz ', the widely accepted belief that the Earth was the center of the universe.
Skipping through the Dark Ages and their medieval mixtape, where knowledge languished like a pub crawl hangover, the decline of the Roman Empire signaled more than the demise of a favored scroll supplier. It led to a fragmentation of knowledge and a dearth of scribes, which meant that scholars had to barter away scientific revelations for goat cheese, leading to a significant setback in the progress of science.
Fear not, intrepid reader, for amidst this tapestry of togas and tumult lay the crucible of modern science. From Euclid's "Elements", which laid the foundation for geometry, to Ptolemy's cosmic gossip columns, which provided the first comprehensive model of the universe, these ancient minds laid down the laws of the universe quicker than you could cry "Eureka!" Their endeavors were not mere guesswork but rather a systematic journey of experimentation, observation, and deduction, resonating through the annals of time.
Today, these venerable scholars might gaze upon our climate quandaries and cloning curiosities with a wry smile. They would remind us that their work, far from being confined to the dusty annals of history, continues to shape our world. They would remind us that science transcends mere beaker juggling; it's about questioning conventions and occasionally dodging ecclesiastical scrutiny.
As we peruse the annals of history, let us raise a glass to these pioneers, blemishes and all. Their tribulations, triumphs, and questionable fashion choices paved the road to a scientific revolution that birthed marvels like WiFi and microwave burritos. Whether you're a scholar or a curious cat browsing the annals, their unique contributions remind us that the oddest journeys often yield the most illuminating discoveries.
And who's to say the next great leap in science won't come from someone pondering the cosmos in pajamas, sipping coffee, and wondering what Aristotle might tweet about quantum mechanics?
THE RUNDOWN
- Ancient Greek thinkers like Aristotle and Pythagoras laid the groundwork for scientific inquiry with theories in biology and mathematics.
- Euclid's "Elements," compiled around 300 BCE, established foundational principles of geometry that influenced scientific thought for centuries.
- Hippocrates, known for his ethical approach to medicine and the Hippocratic Oath, emphasized observation and clinical practice in understanding health and disease.
- Ptolemy's astronomical work in the 2nd century CE contributed to the geocentric model of the universe, influencing medieval and Renaissance cosmology.
- The clash between Galileo Galilei and the Catholic Church in the 17th century over heliocentrism highlighted tensions between science and religious authority.
- The scientific methods developed in ancient Greece and refined in the Islamic Golden Age laid the groundwork for modern scientific inquiry, emphasizing experimentation and empirical observation.
QUESTIONS
- The clash between Galileo and the Catholic Church highlighted tensions between science and religious authority. Why do you think this conflict occurred, and how did it affect the progress of scientific inquiry?
- How did the scientific methods developed in ancient Greece, and later refined during the Islamic Golden Age, lay the groundwork for modern scientific inquiry? Provide an example of how these methods are used in science today.
- Why are experimentation and empirical observation important in scientific inquiry? Can you think of a modern scientific discovery that relied heavily on these methods?
#13 History Can Be Exceptional, But Not Virtuous
The grand tapestry of history, woven with threads of exceptionalism and virtue, or, as I like to call it, the eternal struggle between progress and moral bankruptcy. Strap in, folks, because we're about to take a wild ride through the annals of time, where the heroes are flawed, the villains are complex, and the whole thing is messier than a spaghetti-eating contest on a roller coaster.
Let's kick off with the chart-toppers, shall we? The Industrial Revolution was that awe-inspiring phenomenon that ushered in the contemporary era like a bawling infant fed on coal. Sure, it birthed steam engines, factories, and an economic boom that would make even Scrooge McDuck blush with envy, but let's not gloss over the less glamorous bits. Think child labor, sweatshops hotter than the devil's hot tub, and wealth chasms vast enough to accommodate the entire ensemble of "Hamilton" dancing sideways.
And then there's the Renaissance, where artists, intellectuals, and philosophers were popping up like champagne corks at a celebrity wedding. It was all "Da Vinci this" and "Michelangelo that," with Galileo dropping truth bombs like confetti. But let's face it, folks. For every masterpiece adorning the galleries, a hundred peasants were enduring the boot of feudalism. Ah, progress.
Next up are the gallant protagonists of our saga, the valiant few who stare down injustice with the audacity of David giving Goliath the double deuces. Enter the Civil Rights Movement, where luminaries like MLK Jr. and Rosa Parks dropped truth bombs quicker than a rapper on caffeine. They confronted segregation as if it were an overzealous chihuahua and didn't flinch. But let's not overlook the sobering reality that for every Rosa Parks, there were a thousand unsung heroes whose names never graced the pages of history. The struggle persists.
And then, there's the shadowy underbelly where virtue takes a sabbatical, and humanity plunges headlong into the abyss. Consider the Holocaust, a grotesque horror show that would make Freddy Krueger resemble a cuddly toy. Six million souls extinguished like candles in a tempest, all in the name of some twisted ideology concocted by a certain mustachioed maniac. It's enough to shake one's faith in humanity quicker than a vegan at a barbecue joint.
So, what's the moral of this topsy-turvy narrative? Well, dear comrades, history is a grab bag of assorted nuts, with the occasional nugget of virtue floating amidst a sea of peanuts. It's messy, convoluted, and as straightforward as a politician's pledge. It's our story, warts and all.
RUNDOWN
STATE OF THE WORLD
The grand tapestry of history, woven with threads of exceptionalism and virtue, or, as I like to call it, the eternal struggle between progress and moral bankruptcy. Strap in, folks, because we're about to take a wild ride through the annals of time, where the heroes are flawed, the villains are complex, and the whole thing is messier than a spaghetti-eating contest on a roller coaster.
Let's kick off with the chart-toppers, shall we? The Industrial Revolution was that awe-inspiring phenomenon that ushered in the contemporary era like a bawling infant fed on coal. Sure, it birthed steam engines, factories, and an economic boom that would make even Scrooge McDuck blush with envy, but let's not gloss over the less glamorous bits. Think child labor, sweatshops hotter than the devil's hot tub, and wealth chasms vast enough to accommodate the entire ensemble of "Hamilton" dancing sideways.
And then there's the Renaissance, where artists, intellectuals, and philosophers were popping up like champagne corks at a celebrity wedding. It was all "Da Vinci this" and "Michelangelo that," with Galileo dropping truth bombs like confetti. But let's face it, folks. For every masterpiece adorning the galleries, a hundred peasants were enduring the boot of feudalism. Ah, progress.
Next up are the gallant protagonists of our saga, the valiant few who stare down injustice with the audacity of David giving Goliath the double deuces. Enter the Civil Rights Movement, where luminaries like MLK Jr. and Rosa Parks dropped truth bombs quicker than a rapper on caffeine. They confronted segregation as if it were an overzealous chihuahua and didn't flinch. But let's not overlook the sobering reality that for every Rosa Parks, there were a thousand unsung heroes whose names never graced the pages of history. The struggle persists.
And then, there's the shadowy underbelly where virtue takes a sabbatical, and humanity plunges headlong into the abyss. Consider the Holocaust, a grotesque horror show that would make Freddy Krueger resemble a cuddly toy. Six million souls extinguished like candles in a tempest, all in the name of some twisted ideology concocted by a certain mustachioed maniac. It's enough to shake one's faith in humanity quicker than a vegan at a barbecue joint.
So, what's the moral of this topsy-turvy narrative? Well, dear comrades, history is a grab bag of assorted nuts, with the occasional nugget of virtue floating amidst a sea of peanuts. It's messy, convoluted, and as straightforward as a politician's pledge. It's our story, warts and all.
RUNDOWN
- History's exceptional events, like the Industrial Revolution, often drive progress but can also perpetuate inequalities and exploitation.
- Virtuous acts in history, such as those seen in the Civil Rights Movement, inspire positive change and promote social justice.
- Neglecting historical virtue, as evidenced by the Holocaust, can lead to moral complacency and the perpetuation of injustice.
- Understanding both exceptionalism and virtue in history equips individuals with insights into human behavior and moral responsibility.
- Through critical examination of historical events, individuals gain tools to confront contemporary challenges and shape a more just future.
- Studying history's dual nature fosters empathy, moral discernment, and a deeper understanding of the complexities of the past.
STATE OF THE WORLD
Imagine the world in 585 BCE: a dazzling mosaic of warring empires, burgeoning cultures, and scientific advancements that would leave today's scholars blushing. King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon, the Neo-Babylonian rockstar, struts through a city adorned with architectural marvels like the Hanging Gardens, pushing the boundaries of astronomy. Meanwhile, Lydia's King Alyattes lounges on a treasure trove of gold and silver coinage, resembling the Scrooge McDuck of Anatolia. Having ousted the Assyrians, the Medes quietly dominated from Ecbatana, while Pharaoh Apries of Egypt juggled external threats and internal strife with characteristic drama. In Greece, the Archaic Period, bustles with artistic and philosophical activity, highlighted by Thales of Miletus predicting a solar eclipse that halts a battle between the Medes and Lydians. The Vedic Period in India evolves into early caste systems, with the Upanishads laying Hindu philosophical foundations in a mix of scholarly and spiritual hunger. Like a Game of Thrones script, China's Eastern Zhou Dynasty is rife with political fragmentation, waiting for Confucius to impart his wisdom. Across the Americas, the Olmecs conclude their colossal head sculptures, paving the way for the Maya and Aztec civilizations. Trade routes weave cultures together, with religion at the heart of daily life—polytheism prevailed except among the monotheistic Israelites. Architectural feats like Babylonian ziggurats and Mesoamerican pyramids spring up, showing that these ancient worlds are not merely surviving but thriving, setting the stage for historical echoes. Thus, 585 BCE unfolds as a whimsical, chaotic dance of kings, philosophers, and cultures on the brink of transformative change.
HIGHLIGHTS
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
The Reading section—a realm where our aspirations of enlightenment often clash with the harsh realities of procrastination and the desperate reliance on Google. We soldier on through dense texts, promised 'broadening perspectives' but often wrestling with existential dread and academic pressure. With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a strong cup of coffee, I'll be your guide on this wild journey from dusty tomes to the murky depths of postmodernism. In the midst of all the pretentious prose, there's a glimmer of insight: we're all in this together, united in our struggle to survive without losing our sanity.
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
READING
- Chapter 13. The Struggle for Survival and Sovereignty: Europe's Social and Political Order, 1600-1715
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
- The 17th century was a time of struggle and comfort for upper-crust members of Western societies.
- Monarchs tried to increase their power, aiming to become absolute rulers.
- This led to intense struggles within states.
- In France, Prussia, and Russia, strong monarchs established order and stability.
- In Poland, England, and the Netherlands, powerful nobles sometimes overcame kings.
- Elites held most of the wealth, status, and power, facing revolts mainly from other nobles.
- Common people, especially peasants, faced hardships with little comfort.
- Western Europe experienced bad harvests and disease, worsened by central governments' demands for taxes and soldiers.
- Eastern European peasants suffered under heavy serfdom imposed by landowning nobles.
- Social hierarchies began to loosen slightly in Western Europe but tightened in Eastern Europe.
- Despite wars, revolts, and revolutions, traditional hierarchies mostly remained intact.
- However, changes in science and thought were beginning to transform Western society.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.

Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... The removal of the Indians was explained by Lewis Cass-Secretary of War, governor of the Michigan territory, minister to France, presidential candidate:
A principle of progressive improvement seems almost inherent in human nature. . .. We are all striving in the career of life to acquire riches of honor, or power, or some other object, whose possession is to realize the day dreams of our imaginations; and the aggregate of these efforts constitutes the advance of society. But there is little of this in the constitution of our savages.
Cass-pompous, pretentious, honored (Harvard gave him an honorary doctor of laws degree in 1836, at the height of Indian removal)- claimed to be an expert on the Indians. But he demonstrated again and again, in Richard Drinnon's words (Violence in the American Experience: Winning the West), a "quite marvelous ignorance of Indian life." As governor of the Michigan Territory, Cass took millions of acres from the Indians by treaty: "We must frequently promote their interest against their inclination."
His article in the North American Review in 1830 made the case for Indian Removal. We must not regret, he said, 'the progress of civilization and improvement, the triumph of industry and art, by which these regions have been reclaimed, and over which freedom, religion, and science are extending their sway.' He wished that all this could have been done with 'a smaller sacrifice; that the aboriginal population had accommodated themselves to the inevitable change of their condition... . But such a wish is vain. A barbarous people, depending for subsistence upon the scanty and precarious supplies furnished by the chase, cannot live in contact with a civilized community.'..."
"... The removal of the Indians was explained by Lewis Cass-Secretary of War, governor of the Michigan territory, minister to France, presidential candidate:
A principle of progressive improvement seems almost inherent in human nature. . .. We are all striving in the career of life to acquire riches of honor, or power, or some other object, whose possession is to realize the day dreams of our imaginations; and the aggregate of these efforts constitutes the advance of society. But there is little of this in the constitution of our savages.
Cass-pompous, pretentious, honored (Harvard gave him an honorary doctor of laws degree in 1836, at the height of Indian removal)- claimed to be an expert on the Indians. But he demonstrated again and again, in Richard Drinnon's words (Violence in the American Experience: Winning the West), a "quite marvelous ignorance of Indian life." As governor of the Michigan Territory, Cass took millions of acres from the Indians by treaty: "We must frequently promote their interest against their inclination."
His article in the North American Review in 1830 made the case for Indian Removal. We must not regret, he said, 'the progress of civilization and improvement, the triumph of industry and art, by which these regions have been reclaimed, and over which freedom, religion, and science are extending their sway.' He wished that all this could have been done with 'a smaller sacrifice; that the aboriginal population had accommodated themselves to the inevitable change of their condition... . But such a wish is vain. A barbarous people, depending for subsistence upon the scanty and precarious supplies furnished by the chase, cannot live in contact with a civilized community.'..."

Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
"... Spaniards traversed modern-day Mexico, probing interior areas under Hernando Cortés, who in 1518 led a force of 1,000 soldiers to Tenochtitlán, the site of present-day Mexico City. Cortés encountered powerful Indians called Aztecs, led by their emperor Montezuma. The Aztecs had established a brutal regime that oppressed other natives of the region, capturing large numbers of them for ritual sacrifices in which Aztec priests cut out the beating hearts of living victims. Such barbarity enabled the Spanish to easily enlist other tribes, especially the Tlaxcalans, in their efforts to defeat the Aztecs.
Tenochtitlán sat on an island in the middle of a lake, connected to the outlying areas by three huge causeways. It was a monstrously large city (for the time) of at least 200,000, rigidly divided into nobles and commoner groups.14 Aztec culture created impressive pyramid-shaped temple structures, but Aztec science lacked the simple wheel and the wide range of pulleys and gears that it enabled. But it was sacrifice, not science, that defined Aztec society, whose pyramids, after all, were execution sites. A four-day sacrifice in 1487 by the Aztec king Ahuitzotl involved the butchery of 80,400 prisoners by shifts of priests working four at a time at convex killing tables who kicked lifeless, heartless bodies down the side of the pyramid temple. This worked out to a 'killing rate of fourteen victims a minute over the ninety-six-hour bloodbath.' In addition to the abominable sacrifice system, crime and street carnage were commonplace. More intriguing to the Spanish than the buildings, or even the sacrifices, however, were the legends of gold, silver, and other riches Tenochtitlán contained, protected by the powerful Aztec army..."
"... Spaniards traversed modern-day Mexico, probing interior areas under Hernando Cortés, who in 1518 led a force of 1,000 soldiers to Tenochtitlán, the site of present-day Mexico City. Cortés encountered powerful Indians called Aztecs, led by their emperor Montezuma. The Aztecs had established a brutal regime that oppressed other natives of the region, capturing large numbers of them for ritual sacrifices in which Aztec priests cut out the beating hearts of living victims. Such barbarity enabled the Spanish to easily enlist other tribes, especially the Tlaxcalans, in their efforts to defeat the Aztecs.
Tenochtitlán sat on an island in the middle of a lake, connected to the outlying areas by three huge causeways. It was a monstrously large city (for the time) of at least 200,000, rigidly divided into nobles and commoner groups.14 Aztec culture created impressive pyramid-shaped temple structures, but Aztec science lacked the simple wheel and the wide range of pulleys and gears that it enabled. But it was sacrifice, not science, that defined Aztec society, whose pyramids, after all, were execution sites. A four-day sacrifice in 1487 by the Aztec king Ahuitzotl involved the butchery of 80,400 prisoners by shifts of priests working four at a time at convex killing tables who kicked lifeless, heartless bodies down the side of the pyramid temple. This worked out to a 'killing rate of fourteen victims a minute over the ninety-six-hour bloodbath.' In addition to the abominable sacrifice system, crime and street carnage were commonplace. More intriguing to the Spanish than the buildings, or even the sacrifices, however, were the legends of gold, silver, and other riches Tenochtitlán contained, protected by the powerful Aztec army..."

Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
... In the 1920s, the offices in the buildings along the eastern edge of the Columbia University campus looked from the hills of Morningside Heights out over Harlem. Rexford Tugwell, a professor in the economics department, occupied one of those offices. From behind his desk in Hamilton Hall, Tugwell could not hear the music but he could see the nightclubs, dance halls, and speakeasies that defined the Jazz Age. And so he waited.
Tugwell had been shut off from the pleasures of the body as a child, when asthma and persistent illnesses kept him confined to bed in his rural and isolated hometown in far-western New York State. He grew into an extraordinarily handsome man, with the dark looks and wavy hair of a silent-screen star. But his illnesses continued, and by the time he reached maturity, he had retreated into a world of books. He was a fan of utopian science fiction, such as H. G. Wells’s In the Days of the Comet, in which mankind, fearing destruction from an onrushing comet, remakes world society into a cooperative commune. Tugwell spent much of his youth conjuring perfect worlds inhabited by perfect people. As an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1910s, he fell under the spell of the young economics professor Scott Nearing, who had recently published a book calling for the creation of just such a world. “The kind of social philosophy I was developing under the tutelage of Nearing, reinforced by other instruction,” Tugwell later recalled in his autobiography, “is perhaps best defined in a little book called The Super Race: An American Problem, which Nearing published in 1912.” Nearing argued that the United States should develop, through selective breeding, a race of supermen who would create the world’s first utopia. These ideas, which were bastardized versions of Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy, were then in vogue among German intellectuals who would become the intellectual founders of Nazism.
Tugwell’s other mentor in college was the prominent progressive economist Simon Patten, who had been trained in German universities. “He taught me the importance of looking for uniformities, laws, explanations of the inner forces moving behind the façade of events,” Tugwell remembered. “One of these was the conclusion that our pluralistic system—laissez-faire in industry, checks and balances in government, and so on—must be shaped into a unity if its inherent conflicts, beginning to be so serious, were not to destroy us.” From where did Patten get this benign sounding idea? “He thought that the Germans had the key to that unity in philosophy, in economics, and perhaps in politics. He saw the conflict, now so ominously coming up over the horizon, as one between the living wholeness of the German conception and the dying divisiveness of English pluralism.” Even more ominous was the belief that Patten shared with his German colleagues—who would supply the intellectual basis for Nazism—that industrial capitalism and technological advances had softened and emasculated the people. “Every improvement which simplifies or lessens manual labor,” explained Patten, “increases the amount of the deficiencies which the laboring classes may possess without their being thereby overcome in the struggle for subsistence that the survival of the ignorant brings upon society.” Patten’s solution to this problem was swift, simple, and breathtakingly ruthless. “Social progress is a higher law than equality, and a nation must choose it at any cost,” and the only way to progress is the “eradication of the vicious and inefficient.” But the prescriptions of Nearing and Patten were just academic wishes. Tugwell wished to make them real..."
... In the 1920s, the offices in the buildings along the eastern edge of the Columbia University campus looked from the hills of Morningside Heights out over Harlem. Rexford Tugwell, a professor in the economics department, occupied one of those offices. From behind his desk in Hamilton Hall, Tugwell could not hear the music but he could see the nightclubs, dance halls, and speakeasies that defined the Jazz Age. And so he waited.
Tugwell had been shut off from the pleasures of the body as a child, when asthma and persistent illnesses kept him confined to bed in his rural and isolated hometown in far-western New York State. He grew into an extraordinarily handsome man, with the dark looks and wavy hair of a silent-screen star. But his illnesses continued, and by the time he reached maturity, he had retreated into a world of books. He was a fan of utopian science fiction, such as H. G. Wells’s In the Days of the Comet, in which mankind, fearing destruction from an onrushing comet, remakes world society into a cooperative commune. Tugwell spent much of his youth conjuring perfect worlds inhabited by perfect people. As an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1910s, he fell under the spell of the young economics professor Scott Nearing, who had recently published a book calling for the creation of just such a world. “The kind of social philosophy I was developing under the tutelage of Nearing, reinforced by other instruction,” Tugwell later recalled in his autobiography, “is perhaps best defined in a little book called The Super Race: An American Problem, which Nearing published in 1912.” Nearing argued that the United States should develop, through selective breeding, a race of supermen who would create the world’s first utopia. These ideas, which were bastardized versions of Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy, were then in vogue among German intellectuals who would become the intellectual founders of Nazism.
Tugwell’s other mentor in college was the prominent progressive economist Simon Patten, who had been trained in German universities. “He taught me the importance of looking for uniformities, laws, explanations of the inner forces moving behind the façade of events,” Tugwell remembered. “One of these was the conclusion that our pluralistic system—laissez-faire in industry, checks and balances in government, and so on—must be shaped into a unity if its inherent conflicts, beginning to be so serious, were not to destroy us.” From where did Patten get this benign sounding idea? “He thought that the Germans had the key to that unity in philosophy, in economics, and perhaps in politics. He saw the conflict, now so ominously coming up over the horizon, as one between the living wholeness of the German conception and the dying divisiveness of English pluralism.” Even more ominous was the belief that Patten shared with his German colleagues—who would supply the intellectual basis for Nazism—that industrial capitalism and technological advances had softened and emasculated the people. “Every improvement which simplifies or lessens manual labor,” explained Patten, “increases the amount of the deficiencies which the laboring classes may possess without their being thereby overcome in the struggle for subsistence that the survival of the ignorant brings upon society.” Patten’s solution to this problem was swift, simple, and breathtakingly ruthless. “Social progress is a higher law than equality, and a nation must choose it at any cost,” and the only way to progress is the “eradication of the vicious and inefficient.” But the prescriptions of Nearing and Patten were just academic wishes. Tugwell wished to make them real..."
Step into the rich tapestry of Western history, where a captivating duo, Science and Politics, took the stage. They danced through epochs, their interactions a mix of elegance and occasional discord. From Aristotle's intricate ponderings to Lewis Cass's ambitious scheming, they left a legacy of enlightenment and ongoing debate, a legacy that continues to intrigue and inspire.
Transport yourself to ancient Greece, where Aristotle, renowned for his labyrinthine beard and cosmic contemplations, laid the foundation for biology while gazing at the heavens like a celestial detective. His companion, Ptolemy, boldly proposed Earth as the center of the universe, sparking the bemusement of future astronomers and setting the stage for centuries of celestial exploration.
Leap ahead to the Middle Ages, where Arabic scholars hosted a grand translation gala that awakened Europe. This event, known as the Translation Movement, saw the translation of numerous Greek and Arabic texts into Latin, thereby introducing Europe to a wealth of knowledge. Al-Khwarizmi burst onto the scene with algebra, demonstrating that math was more than just arithmetic. Meanwhile, Avicenna revolutionized medicine with wisdom as potent as any elixir.
Amidst the Renaissance revelry, enter Thomas Aquinas, the Scholastic maestro who blended faith and reason into a scholarly cocktail. His concoction set the scene for a Scientific Revolution that even Galileo would find arresting.
Fast forward to the 19th century, when Lewis Cass, a political prodigy, fancied himself a cultural referee. His manifestos, such as the Indian Removal Act, painted Native Americans as impediments to industrial Manifest Destiny, advocating their displacement—a tragic tale of tears and graves. This act, signed into law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, led to the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands.
However, Cass was not the sole audacious figure. A group of thinkers championed progress as a panacea, using what they termed 'scientific righteousness' to justify colonial conquest. This concept, a distortion of scientific principles, was used to argue that the colonizers were more advanced and therefore had the right to conquer and exploit other lands and peoples. Progress, it seemed, harbored a shadowy side—much like a friend whose thrilling antics ended in a mess, leaving you to ponder the aftermath.
Today, these tales serve not only as entertainment but as instructive parables. They illustrate how science can wade into murky moral waters while pursuing truth. While we celebrate Aristotle's insights and Avicenna's remedies, we must also confront Cass's legacy—a stark reminder of progress trampling the vulnerable.
Studying these stories is not a mere tour through history; it's a masterclass in how ideas forge societies. Science erects towers of technology while wielding a double-edged sword, teaching us to split atoms and mend hearts, yet sometimes whispering into Cass's ear, urging cultural bulldozing in the name of advancement.
So, what lesson can we glean from this rollercoaster ride through history's VIP lounge? That progress is not a solo performance but a collective symphony where all voices are heard. We dance on a tightrope between brilliance and blunder, a metaphor that illustrates the potential for both success and failure in our pursuit of progress. And the view is good if you appreciate the occasional pratfall.
As we delve into these narratives, let us quench our thirst from Aristotle's cup of curiosity, but always keep Cass's specter within sight. Let us celebrate science's lofty aspirations while staying grounded in reality. History, with its tendency for repetition, serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us to avoid stumbling over familiar pitfalls. It underscores the need for balance and ethical considerations in our pursuit of scientific and political progress.
Here's to navigating the carousel of ideas, a metaphor that captures the dynamic and ever-changing nature of intellectual discourse. It's a place where satire and critique intertwine, and every revolution carries a hint of irony. Welcome to the spectacle where clowns don lab coats, and the tightrope is always taut.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Transport yourself to ancient Greece, where Aristotle, renowned for his labyrinthine beard and cosmic contemplations, laid the foundation for biology while gazing at the heavens like a celestial detective. His companion, Ptolemy, boldly proposed Earth as the center of the universe, sparking the bemusement of future astronomers and setting the stage for centuries of celestial exploration.
Leap ahead to the Middle Ages, where Arabic scholars hosted a grand translation gala that awakened Europe. This event, known as the Translation Movement, saw the translation of numerous Greek and Arabic texts into Latin, thereby introducing Europe to a wealth of knowledge. Al-Khwarizmi burst onto the scene with algebra, demonstrating that math was more than just arithmetic. Meanwhile, Avicenna revolutionized medicine with wisdom as potent as any elixir.
Amidst the Renaissance revelry, enter Thomas Aquinas, the Scholastic maestro who blended faith and reason into a scholarly cocktail. His concoction set the scene for a Scientific Revolution that even Galileo would find arresting.
Fast forward to the 19th century, when Lewis Cass, a political prodigy, fancied himself a cultural referee. His manifestos, such as the Indian Removal Act, painted Native Americans as impediments to industrial Manifest Destiny, advocating their displacement—a tragic tale of tears and graves. This act, signed into law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, led to the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands.
However, Cass was not the sole audacious figure. A group of thinkers championed progress as a panacea, using what they termed 'scientific righteousness' to justify colonial conquest. This concept, a distortion of scientific principles, was used to argue that the colonizers were more advanced and therefore had the right to conquer and exploit other lands and peoples. Progress, it seemed, harbored a shadowy side—much like a friend whose thrilling antics ended in a mess, leaving you to ponder the aftermath.
Today, these tales serve not only as entertainment but as instructive parables. They illustrate how science can wade into murky moral waters while pursuing truth. While we celebrate Aristotle's insights and Avicenna's remedies, we must also confront Cass's legacy—a stark reminder of progress trampling the vulnerable.
Studying these stories is not a mere tour through history; it's a masterclass in how ideas forge societies. Science erects towers of technology while wielding a double-edged sword, teaching us to split atoms and mend hearts, yet sometimes whispering into Cass's ear, urging cultural bulldozing in the name of advancement.
So, what lesson can we glean from this rollercoaster ride through history's VIP lounge? That progress is not a solo performance but a collective symphony where all voices are heard. We dance on a tightrope between brilliance and blunder, a metaphor that illustrates the potential for both success and failure in our pursuit of progress. And the view is good if you appreciate the occasional pratfall.
As we delve into these narratives, let us quench our thirst from Aristotle's cup of curiosity, but always keep Cass's specter within sight. Let us celebrate science's lofty aspirations while staying grounded in reality. History, with its tendency for repetition, serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us to avoid stumbling over familiar pitfalls. It underscores the need for balance and ethical considerations in our pursuit of scientific and political progress.
Here's to navigating the carousel of ideas, a metaphor that captures the dynamic and ever-changing nature of intellectual discourse. It's a place where satire and critique intertwine, and every revolution carries a hint of irony. Welcome to the spectacle where clowns don lab coats, and the tightrope is always taut.
THE RUNDOWN
- Ancient Greek and Roman scholars like Aristotle and Ptolemy laid the groundwork for Western scientific inquiry, exploring fields such as biology and astronomy.
- The Middle Ages saw the translation of Greek and Arabic texts, sparking a revival of scientific learning in Europe and setting the stage for the Renaissance.
- Islamic scholars like Al-Khwarizmi and Avicenna made significant contributions to mathematics and medicine during this period of intellectual exchange.
- Thomas Aquinas and Scholasticism in the 13th century sought to reconcile faith with reason, influencing European thought and preparing the ground for later scientific developments.
- In the 19th century, Lewis Cass justified Native American removal, arguing their way of life was incompatible with progress and civilization, reflecting prevailing attitudes of European superiority.
- Cass's views exemplify how scientific and intellectual advancements have been historically used to rationalize colonialism and cultural oppression, highlighting ongoing debates about progress and ethics in contemporary society.
QUESTIONS
- How did the intellectual exchange between Greek, Arabic, and European scholars during the Middle Ages lead to advancements in various fields such as mathematics, astronomy, and medicine?
- Reflect on a historical example where scientific reasoning was used to justify unethical practices. How can we critically evaluate such justifications today?
- Discuss how modern scientific advancements should be balanced with ethical considerations to avoid repeating past mistakes. Can you think of a current issue where this balance is being debated?
Prepare to be transported into the captivating realm of historical films and videos. Brace yourselves for a mind-bending odyssey through time as we embark on a cinematic expedition. Within these flickering frames, the past morphs into a vivid tapestry of triumphs, tragedies, and transformative moments that have shaped the very fabric of our existence. We shall immerse ourselves in a whirlwind of visual narratives, dissecting the nuances of artistic interpretations, examining the storytelling techniques, and voraciously devouring historical accuracy with the ferocity of a time-traveling historian. So strap in, hold tight, and prepare to have your perception of history forever shattered by the mesmerizing lens of the camera.
THE RUNDOWN
In the hazy annals of history, where legends intertwine with facts, emerges a narrative that challenges conventional wisdom with irreverent wit and scholarly curiosity. Imagine a world where the Tower of Babel, a biblical structure, pierced the heavens not with modern cranes but with ancient ingenuity and sun-baked bricks stacked to dizzying heights. And consider David's slingshot, a weapon of choice for the biblical Hero, which we delve into the physics of, revealing it as more than a mere tale of underdog triumph but a lesson in medieval ballistics that could stand up to modern scrutiny.
But the intrigue doesn't stop there. This journey through biblical mysteries is a wild ride, taking us through a tapestry of ancient marvels. We explore the physics of David's slingshot, the chemistry of ancient concoctions, and the tactics of ancient biological warfare. We light a fire—quite literally—with experiments that show ancient concoctions of naphtha, sulfur, and quicklime could spark flames from water, echoing the fiery miracles of Elijah's time. And we don't forget the sting of ancient biological warfare, where toxic honey from rhododendron bushes spelled doom for unwary soldiers. It's a journey that blends irreverence with insight, challenging us to rethink what we know about the technological prowess of civilizations long past.
In the hazy annals of history, where legends intertwine with facts, emerges a narrative that challenges conventional wisdom with irreverent wit and scholarly curiosity. Imagine a world where the Tower of Babel, a biblical structure, pierced the heavens not with modern cranes but with ancient ingenuity and sun-baked bricks stacked to dizzying heights. And consider David's slingshot, a weapon of choice for the biblical Hero, which we delve into the physics of, revealing it as more than a mere tale of underdog triumph but a lesson in medieval ballistics that could stand up to modern scrutiny.
But the intrigue doesn't stop there. This journey through biblical mysteries is a wild ride, taking us through a tapestry of ancient marvels. We explore the physics of David's slingshot, the chemistry of ancient concoctions, and the tactics of ancient biological warfare. We light a fire—quite literally—with experiments that show ancient concoctions of naphtha, sulfur, and quicklime could spark flames from water, echoing the fiery miracles of Elijah's time. And we don't forget the sting of ancient biological warfare, where toxic honey from rhododendron bushes spelled doom for unwary soldiers. It's a journey that blends irreverence with insight, challenging us to rethink what we know about the technological prowess of civilizations long past.
Welcome to the mind-bending Key Terms extravaganza of our history class learning module. Brace yourselves; we will unravel the cryptic codes, secret handshakes, and linguistic labyrinths that make up the twisted tapestry of historical knowledge. These key terms are the Rosetta Stones of our academic journey, the skeleton keys to unlocking the enigmatic doors of comprehension. They're like historical Swiss Army knives, equipped with blades of definition and corkscrews of contextual examples, ready to pierce through the fog of confusion and liberate your intellectual curiosity. By harnessing the power of these mighty key terms, you'll possess the superhuman ability to traverse the treacherous terrains of primary sources, surf the tumultuous waves of academic texts, and engage in epic battles of historical debate. The past awaits, and the key terms are keys to unlocking its dazzling secrets.
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
- 585 BCE - Thales and the Solar Eclipse
- 530 BCE - Pythagorean Theorem
- 546 BCE - Anaximander and the Geographical Map
- 300 BCE - Euclid’s “Elements"
- 270 BCE - Aristarchus
- 240 BCE - Eratosthenes
- 250 BCE - Archimedes Principles
- 150 CE - Ptolemy’s "Almagest"
- 60 CE - Hero of Alexandria
- 636 CE - Etymologiae
- 703 CE - De Natura Rerum
- 990 CE - Gerbert of Aurillac
- 1021 CE - Book of Optics
- 1025 CE - The Canon of Medicine
- 1324 CE - Ockham's Razor
- 1391 CE - Treatise on the Astrolabe
- 1440 CE - De Docta Ignorantia
- 1452 CE - De re aedificatoria
- 1464 CE - Regiomontanus
- 1478 CE - Leonardo da Vinci’s Notebooks
DISCLAIMER: Welcome scholars to the wild and wacky world of history class. This isn't your granddaddy's boring ol' lecture, baby. We will take a trip through time, which will be one wild ride. I know some of you are in a brick-and-mortar setting, while others are in the vast digital wasteland. But fear not; we're all in this together. Online students might miss out on some in-person interaction, but you can still join in on the fun. This little shindig aims to get you all engaged with the course material and understand how past societies have shaped the world we know today. We'll talk about revolutions, wars, and other crazy stuff. So get ready, kids, because it's going to be one heck of a trip. And for all, you online students out there, don't be shy. Please share your thoughts and ideas with the rest of us. The Professor will do his best to give everyone an equal opportunity to learn, so don't hold back. So, let's do this thing!
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Objective:
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Objective:
Activity #2: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for the pièce de résistance of this classroom module - the summary section. As we embark on this tantalizing journey, we'll savor the exquisite flavors of knowledge, highlighting the fundamental ingredients and spices that have seasoned our minds throughout these captivating lessons. Prepare to indulge in a savory recap that will leave your intellectual taste buds tingling, serving as a passport to further enlightenment.
Once upon a time, in a world not entirely dissimilar from our own yet delightfully exaggerated, there existed a rich tapestry interwoven with threads of scientific inquiry, societal norms, and occasional cosmic capers. Imagine ancient Greeks, draped in their toga-chic fashion, contemplating the cosmos with the gravitas of philosophers in a noodle shop. Aristotle, in his logical enthusiasm, one day decided to categorize the natural world akin to a meticulous organizer arranging spice jars. This act, seemingly simple, was a profound step that set humanity on a quest to label and conquer nature as if it were an IKEA catalog. It was the beginning of a journey that would unravel the mysteries of the universe and shape the course of human civilization.
Meanwhile, Pythagoras, a mathematical enthusiast with a penchant for right angles and triangles, formulated geometric theories that would leave your protractor blushing. His "Elements" became the trendiest blueprint for logical reasoning, spreading like a viral TikTok dance across the ancient world.
Skip ahead a few centuries and meet Ptolemy, the original stargazer who shook things up (specifically, the Earth) by asserting that the universe revolved around us. This belief, known as the geocentric theory, was a widely accepted scientific model. His geocentric theory epitomizes an ego trip—imagine believing the entire universe orbited around your entourage! However, it took a couple of rebellious figures, Copernicus and Galileo, armed with telescopes and bold proclamations, to crash that exclusive party. They challenged the status quo, proclaiming, 'Sorry to burst your celestial bubble, but the Earth isn't quite the center of the universe.' Their discoveries were not just scientific breakthroughs, but they also symbolized the power of questioning and the potential for change.
With empirical data and the confidence of a TikTok influencer, Galileo dared to challenge the Church's geocentric narrative. His reward? A front-row seat at the Inquisition, where they roasted him like marshmallows over a bonfire of scientific progress. The moral: when challenging entrenched beliefs, prepare for theological fireworks. But Galileo's courage and resilience in the face of adversity is a testament to the indomitable spirit of scientific inquiry, inspiring generations to come and reminding us of the immense sacrifices made for the pursuit of knowledge.
Then arrived the Scientific Revolution—a lively soirée where Descartes, Newton, and their cohorts imbibed empirical evidence like shots and danced as if no one was watching (except, perhaps, the Church, lingering in the corner with a skeptical eye). This period, which spanned from the 16th to the 18th century, was marked by a shift from traditional beliefs to a reliance on empirical evidence and reason. Descartes dove deep into existential questioning, doubting everything except his existence (a classic Descartes maneuver), while Newton laid down the laws of motion like a cosmic referee.
Simultaneously, in the Islamic Golden Age, scholars were dropping intellectual bombs left and right. For instance, Ibn al-Haytham refined optics and the scientific method, leading to the development of lenses and the understanding of light. Avicenna penned medical marvels, such as his Canon of Medicine, which would outlast any Kardashian scandal. Their contributions resembled a cultural potluck where each guest brought their finest intellectual dish, leaving an enduring flavor in the recipe of human progress.
Fast forward to the Industrial Revolution—a tumultuous rollercoaster ride of steam, steel, and smog. Factories heralded progress, revolutionizing production and improving living standards. However, cities swelled with coal and capitalism, leading to environmental degradation and social inequity. Humanity stumbled upon a feast of technological wonders but skimmed over the fine print on consequences. Suddenly, we were waist-deep in social inequity, environmental chaos, and ethical quandaries big enough to make a philosopher blush.
Today, as we sip our artisanal lattes and browse existential memes, the annals of Western science beckon like an old friend with many cautionary tales. It's not merely about celebrating our ability to split atoms and decode DNA—it's about heeding the lessons from our past, like when we valued dogma over data and nearly barbecued Galileo. Oops. Reflecting on past mistakes is crucial for steering our future course with wisdom and foresight.
So, dear reader, as you navigate this absurdly familiar world, remember that science transcends the mere discovery of galaxies or the enhancement of iPhones. It's about posing intricate questions, challenging the status quo, and embracing the unpredictable dance of progress. This critical thinking and questioning process, the very essence of scientific inquiry, is what empowers us to understand the world around us. Ultimately, it's not the discoveries we unveil but the lessons we internalize that define our odyssey through this cosmic carnival called life.
or, in other words:
Meanwhile, Pythagoras, a mathematical enthusiast with a penchant for right angles and triangles, formulated geometric theories that would leave your protractor blushing. His "Elements" became the trendiest blueprint for logical reasoning, spreading like a viral TikTok dance across the ancient world.
Skip ahead a few centuries and meet Ptolemy, the original stargazer who shook things up (specifically, the Earth) by asserting that the universe revolved around us. This belief, known as the geocentric theory, was a widely accepted scientific model. His geocentric theory epitomizes an ego trip—imagine believing the entire universe orbited around your entourage! However, it took a couple of rebellious figures, Copernicus and Galileo, armed with telescopes and bold proclamations, to crash that exclusive party. They challenged the status quo, proclaiming, 'Sorry to burst your celestial bubble, but the Earth isn't quite the center of the universe.' Their discoveries were not just scientific breakthroughs, but they also symbolized the power of questioning and the potential for change.
With empirical data and the confidence of a TikTok influencer, Galileo dared to challenge the Church's geocentric narrative. His reward? A front-row seat at the Inquisition, where they roasted him like marshmallows over a bonfire of scientific progress. The moral: when challenging entrenched beliefs, prepare for theological fireworks. But Galileo's courage and resilience in the face of adversity is a testament to the indomitable spirit of scientific inquiry, inspiring generations to come and reminding us of the immense sacrifices made for the pursuit of knowledge.
Then arrived the Scientific Revolution—a lively soirée where Descartes, Newton, and their cohorts imbibed empirical evidence like shots and danced as if no one was watching (except, perhaps, the Church, lingering in the corner with a skeptical eye). This period, which spanned from the 16th to the 18th century, was marked by a shift from traditional beliefs to a reliance on empirical evidence and reason. Descartes dove deep into existential questioning, doubting everything except his existence (a classic Descartes maneuver), while Newton laid down the laws of motion like a cosmic referee.
Simultaneously, in the Islamic Golden Age, scholars were dropping intellectual bombs left and right. For instance, Ibn al-Haytham refined optics and the scientific method, leading to the development of lenses and the understanding of light. Avicenna penned medical marvels, such as his Canon of Medicine, which would outlast any Kardashian scandal. Their contributions resembled a cultural potluck where each guest brought their finest intellectual dish, leaving an enduring flavor in the recipe of human progress.
Fast forward to the Industrial Revolution—a tumultuous rollercoaster ride of steam, steel, and smog. Factories heralded progress, revolutionizing production and improving living standards. However, cities swelled with coal and capitalism, leading to environmental degradation and social inequity. Humanity stumbled upon a feast of technological wonders but skimmed over the fine print on consequences. Suddenly, we were waist-deep in social inequity, environmental chaos, and ethical quandaries big enough to make a philosopher blush.
Today, as we sip our artisanal lattes and browse existential memes, the annals of Western science beckon like an old friend with many cautionary tales. It's not merely about celebrating our ability to split atoms and decode DNA—it's about heeding the lessons from our past, like when we valued dogma over data and nearly barbecued Galileo. Oops. Reflecting on past mistakes is crucial for steering our future course with wisdom and foresight.
So, dear reader, as you navigate this absurdly familiar world, remember that science transcends the mere discovery of galaxies or the enhancement of iPhones. It's about posing intricate questions, challenging the status quo, and embracing the unpredictable dance of progress. This critical thinking and questioning process, the very essence of scientific inquiry, is what empowers us to understand the world around us. Ultimately, it's not the discoveries we unveil but the lessons we internalize that define our odyssey through this cosmic carnival called life.
or, in other words:
- Ancient Greek thinkers like Aristotle and Pythagoras laid foundational theories in biology and mathematics, emphasizing observation and logical reasoning, which shaped early scientific inquiry.
- Euclid's "Elements," compiled around 300 BCE, established basic principles of geometry, setting a standard for mathematical reasoning and shaping scientific thought for centuries.
- Ptolemy's astronomical work in the 2nd century CE supported the geocentric model of the universe, influencing medieval and Renaissance cosmology, and highlighting the dominance of Greek scientific ideas.
- Galileo Galilei's advocacy for heliocentrism in the 17th century challenged the geocentric view and clashed with the Catholic Church, illustrating tensions between scientific progress and religious authority.
- The Scientific Revolution in the 16th and 17th centuries, led by figures like Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton, emphasized empirical observation and experimentation, ushering in a new era of scientific inquiry and challenging traditional beliefs.
- The Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century accelerated technological advancements in manufacturing and transportation, transforming societies while raising ethical concerns about labor exploitation and environmental sustainability.
ASSIGNMENTS
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #014
- Forum Discussion #14
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #014
One Islam Productions is a media organization dedicated to producing educational and inspirational content rooted in Islamic teachings. Watch the following:
Please answer the following question:
During the Islamic Golden Age, scholars made significant contributions to fields like mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. Imagine you are a historian writing about this era. Based on what you've learned, which contribution do you think had the most impact on shaping modern society? Explain your reasoning with examples from the era's achievements.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
Prepare yourselves, marveling machines of the digital age, for a journey through history to the Islamic Golden Age. In this epoch, Baghdad thrived as an ancient Silicon Valley, its scholars in flowing robes crafting potions that outshone even Harry Potter's Polyjuice. From the 8th to the 14th centuries, this was a bustling marketplace of ideas: mathematicians birthed algebra, stargazers peered through advanced astronomical instruments like the astrolabe, and physicians advanced treatments beyond leeches, introducing new surgical techniques and pharmacological remedies. The Abbasid Caliphate, centered in Baghdad, attracted scholars and artists worldwide, translating Greek, Roman, and Persian texts and igniting intellectual fervor. It wasn't just about intellect; this era prized innovation, delving into philosophy that rivaled Descartes and igniting literary scenes akin to medieval poetry slams. Beyond its achievements, the Islamic Golden Age laid the foundation for a civilization valuing curiosity, knowledge, and, surprisingly, tolerance amidst its intellectual and cultural effervescence—a stark contrast to today's discordant digital landscapes.
During the Islamic Golden Age, scholars made significant contributions to fields like mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. Imagine you are a historian writing about this era. Based on what you've learned, which contribution do you think had the most impact on shaping modern society? Explain your reasoning with examples from the era's achievements.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
Prepare yourselves, marveling machines of the digital age, for a journey through history to the Islamic Golden Age. In this epoch, Baghdad thrived as an ancient Silicon Valley, its scholars in flowing robes crafting potions that outshone even Harry Potter's Polyjuice. From the 8th to the 14th centuries, this was a bustling marketplace of ideas: mathematicians birthed algebra, stargazers peered through advanced astronomical instruments like the astrolabe, and physicians advanced treatments beyond leeches, introducing new surgical techniques and pharmacological remedies. The Abbasid Caliphate, centered in Baghdad, attracted scholars and artists worldwide, translating Greek, Roman, and Persian texts and igniting intellectual fervor. It wasn't just about intellect; this era prized innovation, delving into philosophy that rivaled Descartes and igniting literary scenes akin to medieval poetry slams. Beyond its achievements, the Islamic Golden Age laid the foundation for a civilization valuing curiosity, knowledge, and, surprisingly, tolerance amidst its intellectual and cultural effervescence—a stark contrast to today's discordant digital landscapes.
Hey, welcome to the work cited section! Here's where you'll find all the heavy hitters that inspired the content you've just consumed. Some might think citations are as dull as unbuttered toast, but nothing gets my intellectual juices flowing like a good reference list. Don't get me wrong, just because we've cited a source; doesn't mean we're always going to see eye-to-eye. But that's the beauty of it - it's up to you to chew on the material and come to conclusions. Listen, we've gone to great lengths to ensure these citations are accurate, but let's face it, we're all human. So, give us a holler if you notice any mistakes or suggest more sources. We're always looking to up our game. Ultimately, it's all about pursuing knowledge and truth.
Work Cited:
Work Cited:
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Disclaimer: This learning module was primarily created by the professor with the assistance of AI technology. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, please note that the AI's contribution was limited to some regions of the module. The professor takes full responsibility for the content of this module and any errors or omissions therein. This module is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice or consultation. The professor and AI cannot be held responsible for any consequences arising from using this module.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.