Module Eight: Smite Club
The labyrinth of chaos that was Western civilization pre-1500 CE is a true mayhem masterpiece woven with conquests, bloodshed, and the occasional misguided moral crusade. Join me on this historical rollercoaster, where the ghosts of yore shed light on our present follies, offering a mix of cautionary tales and twisted reflections of our societal quirks.
Imagine Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome locked in a timeless tango of death over land, resources, and the age-old quest for supremacy. From Alexander the Great's grand conquests to Rome's grudge match with Carthage, war was the name of the game. Sure, it birthed some nifty advancements in the art of war, but at what cost? Victory tastes bitter when seasoned with the tears of the defeated.
Welcome to medieval Europe, where every lord fancied himself a mini-king with his army—a real-life Game of Thrones minus the dragons (alas). The Crusades epitomized this era's blend of religious fervor and land grabs, all wrapped in a shiny package of chivalric ideals. Nothing says "honorable warfare," like carving a path to the Holy Land in the name of God, right?
The medieval circus of religious conflicts—a whack-a-mole of heresy and orthodoxy. From the Albigensian Crusade to the Spanish Inquisition, it was open season for anyone straying from the approved dogma. Torture, persecution, and execution were all the rage, courtesy of our friendly neighborhood religious institutions. Because nothing says "love thy neighbor" like a good old-fashioned witch hunt.
But fret not, dear reader, for amid this blood-soaked saga lies a glimmer of hope—or at least some valuable life lessons we can pluck from the rubble of the past:
Violence isn't just a pastime for bored rulers—it's often fueled by good old-fashioned greed, religious zeal, and the ever-popular socioeconomic inequality. So, next time you're tempted to raid your neighbor's pantry, perhaps consider therapy instead. By peeking into the historical abyss, we can't help but ponder the role of cultural beliefs and moral values in perpetuating violence. It's like holding up a mirror to society and realizing we're all just a few bad decisions away from starting our holy war.
Hey, policymakers, here's a wild thought—maybe instead of stumbling into wars, we could take a page from history for once. Spoiler alert: Peaceful coexistence is much more sustainable than burning bridges (and cities) every few decades. Before you don your armor and march off to battle, ponder the ethical implications of your actions. Is it genuinely worth sacrificing lives and livelihoods for a patch of land or a shiny new title? You can invest in some conflict resolution skills instead of sharpening your swords.
In conclusion, the history of violence in Western civilization before 1500 CE is a cautionary tale wrapped in blood-stained parchment. Let us learn from our ancestors' missteps lest we find ourselves trapped in the same cycle of folly and ruin. And remember, while violence may be as ancient as humanity, there's no rule saying we must keep replaying the same tired game.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Imagine Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome locked in a timeless tango of death over land, resources, and the age-old quest for supremacy. From Alexander the Great's grand conquests to Rome's grudge match with Carthage, war was the name of the game. Sure, it birthed some nifty advancements in the art of war, but at what cost? Victory tastes bitter when seasoned with the tears of the defeated.
Welcome to medieval Europe, where every lord fancied himself a mini-king with his army—a real-life Game of Thrones minus the dragons (alas). The Crusades epitomized this era's blend of religious fervor and land grabs, all wrapped in a shiny package of chivalric ideals. Nothing says "honorable warfare," like carving a path to the Holy Land in the name of God, right?
The medieval circus of religious conflicts—a whack-a-mole of heresy and orthodoxy. From the Albigensian Crusade to the Spanish Inquisition, it was open season for anyone straying from the approved dogma. Torture, persecution, and execution were all the rage, courtesy of our friendly neighborhood religious institutions. Because nothing says "love thy neighbor" like a good old-fashioned witch hunt.
But fret not, dear reader, for amid this blood-soaked saga lies a glimmer of hope—or at least some valuable life lessons we can pluck from the rubble of the past:
Violence isn't just a pastime for bored rulers—it's often fueled by good old-fashioned greed, religious zeal, and the ever-popular socioeconomic inequality. So, next time you're tempted to raid your neighbor's pantry, perhaps consider therapy instead. By peeking into the historical abyss, we can't help but ponder the role of cultural beliefs and moral values in perpetuating violence. It's like holding up a mirror to society and realizing we're all just a few bad decisions away from starting our holy war.
Hey, policymakers, here's a wild thought—maybe instead of stumbling into wars, we could take a page from history for once. Spoiler alert: Peaceful coexistence is much more sustainable than burning bridges (and cities) every few decades. Before you don your armor and march off to battle, ponder the ethical implications of your actions. Is it genuinely worth sacrificing lives and livelihoods for a patch of land or a shiny new title? You can invest in some conflict resolution skills instead of sharpening your swords.
In conclusion, the history of violence in Western civilization before 1500 CE is a cautionary tale wrapped in blood-stained parchment. Let us learn from our ancestors' missteps lest we find ourselves trapped in the same cycle of folly and ruin. And remember, while violence may be as ancient as humanity, there's no rule saying we must keep replaying the same tired game.
THE RUNDOWN
- Before 1500 CE, places like Egypt, Greece, and Rome fought wars a lot for things like land and power.
- In Europe during the Middle Ages, lords and kings had their own armies, which led to many battles and raids.
- People in the past often fought because of religion, like the Crusades where Christians fought Muslims for control of the Holy Land.
- The Church also punished people who didn't follow its rules, sometimes torturing or killing them in events like the Inquisition.
- Learning about violence in the past helps us understand why people fight and how to make things better now.
- By studying history, we can see what causes violence, learn from mistakes, and try to build a world where people can live peacefully.
QUESTIONS
- How significant were the desires for land and power in fueling wars in ancient and medieval times? Can you think of modern examples where similar desires lead to conflict?
- How did the balance between religious and secular authority influence conflicts in the past? How does this balance play out in contemporary conflicts?
- How were ethical considerations regarding war and violence addressed in historical contexts? Compare historical perspectives on the ethics of war with modern views on warfare and international law.
#8 Focus on the Vices
The allure of indulgence! From the primal depths of our existence, humanity has been captivated by the trifecta of desire: sex, drugs, and violence. It's akin to the aroma of a succulent steak on life's grill, enticing us as our inner demons eagerly await their feast. But let's not rely solely on my musings; instead, let's embark on a journey through history's corridors. Imagine ancient Greece, where wine flowed as freely as water. Those draped in togas didn't merely contemplate the cosmos; they imbibed fermented grape nectar with zeal. And why not? It's challenging to philosophize without a touch of intoxication.
Yet, vices extend beyond mere intoxication and philosophical discourse; they transcend temporal and cultural barriers akin to a well-traveled adventurer reveling in debauchery. Whether indulging in opium dens in 19th-century Shanghai or frequenting speakeasies during Prohibition, the allure of forbidden pleasures is undeniably human. However, no discourse on vices is complete without acknowledging societal scrutiny. From puritanical reproach to outright moral hysteria, our stance on indulgence is as erratic as a stormy sea. Consider those subjected to witch hunts or ensnared in drug wars; society condemns what it secretly craves.
But fret not, dear reader, for amidst this moral haze lies enlightenment. By delving into our collective past, we uncover profound truths about humanity, flaws included. It's akin to holding a distorted mirror to society, confronting its uglier aspects. And perhaps, through this introspection, we emerge with wisdom and empathy, grateful that togas are no longer in vogue. So, let's toast to the vices of antiquity, those forbidden fruits that have tantalized us throughout time. Whether navigating the underbelly of ancient Rome or reveling in modern debauchery, life would be markedly dull without them.
RUNDOWN
STATE OF THE WORLD
The allure of indulgence! From the primal depths of our existence, humanity has been captivated by the trifecta of desire: sex, drugs, and violence. It's akin to the aroma of a succulent steak on life's grill, enticing us as our inner demons eagerly await their feast. But let's not rely solely on my musings; instead, let's embark on a journey through history's corridors. Imagine ancient Greece, where wine flowed as freely as water. Those draped in togas didn't merely contemplate the cosmos; they imbibed fermented grape nectar with zeal. And why not? It's challenging to philosophize without a touch of intoxication.
Yet, vices extend beyond mere intoxication and philosophical discourse; they transcend temporal and cultural barriers akin to a well-traveled adventurer reveling in debauchery. Whether indulging in opium dens in 19th-century Shanghai or frequenting speakeasies during Prohibition, the allure of forbidden pleasures is undeniably human. However, no discourse on vices is complete without acknowledging societal scrutiny. From puritanical reproach to outright moral hysteria, our stance on indulgence is as erratic as a stormy sea. Consider those subjected to witch hunts or ensnared in drug wars; society condemns what it secretly craves.
But fret not, dear reader, for amidst this moral haze lies enlightenment. By delving into our collective past, we uncover profound truths about humanity, flaws included. It's akin to holding a distorted mirror to society, confronting its uglier aspects. And perhaps, through this introspection, we emerge with wisdom and empathy, grateful that togas are no longer in vogue. So, let's toast to the vices of antiquity, those forbidden fruits that have tantalized us throughout time. Whether navigating the underbelly of ancient Rome or reveling in modern debauchery, life would be markedly dull without them.
RUNDOWN
- Valuable insights into human behavior are gained through a historical exploration of vices, uncovering societal norms and values.
- Societal norms and values are uncovered by delving into vices, moving beyond sensational details.
- The allure of vices like sex, drugs, and violence for entertainment is explored, reflecting timeless human fascination.
- Ancient Greek perspectives on wine are examined to reveal insights into their notions of sophistication and culture.
- Vices are recognized as connectors across time and cultures, exemplified by 19th-century Chinese efforts to suppress opium smoking.
- The dual impact of studying vices, which may perpetuate stereotypes and stigmatize certain groups, is acknowledged, emphasizing the importance of a nuanced approach.
- Advocacy for exploring vices in history to deepen understanding of human nature, foster moral compasses, and contribute to a more enlightened, compassionate world is emphasized.
STATE OF THE WORLD
World Map, 800 BCE
In 480 BCE, humanity was in full swing—waging wars, creating art, and stumbling through existence with a flair for drama. The Persians, led by Xerxes I, ruled an expansive empire from the Indus Valley to the Mediterranean, while the Greeks, a squabbling bunch of city-states, united under King Leonidas of Sparta for a heroic last stand at Thermopylae and Themistocles of Athens to challenge Persian naval power at Salamis. Across the Mediterranean, the Carthaginians were busy building their trade empire, and in Egypt, the locals strove to maintain their culture under Persian rule. In India, the Mahajanapadas jostled for supremacy as the Upanishads laid philosophical foundations, and in China, the late Zhou Dynasty saw a philosophical bloom despite crumbling central authority. The Olmecs in the Americas were in decline, the Scythians roamed Central Asia with unmatched horsemanship, and the Celts perfected their tribal lifestyle in Europe. Amidst this, Greek culture thrived, birthing Western philosophy and drama, while Persian grandeur was immortalized in projects like Persepolis. This year encapsulates epic battles, intellectual ferment, and the perennial absurdity of human endeavors, painting a rich, varied picture of our ancient past, a testament to the diverse cultural achievements of our ancestors.
HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
The Reading section—a realm where our aspirations of enlightenment often clash with the harsh realities of procrastination and the desperate reliance on Google. We soldier on through dense texts, promised 'broadening perspectives' but often wrestling with existential dread and academic pressure. With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a strong cup of coffee, I'll be your guide on this wild journey from dusty tomes to the murky depths of postmodernism. In the midst of all the pretentious prose, there's a glimmer of insight: we're all in this together, united in our struggle to survive without losing our sanity.
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
READING
- Chapter 8. Order Restored: The High Middle Ages, 1000-1300
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
- At the start of the first millennium CE, agricultural innovations led to rapid population growth in Europe.
- This growth fueled the expansion of Western European civilization, marking the peak of the Middle Ages.
- During this period, Western Europeans made significant intellectual advancements in philosophy, engineering, and literature.
- Kings began transforming feudal lands into national monarchies, sometimes through peaceful means and other times through violent confrontations with nobles.
- The church also increased its power, aiming to unite Europe under a single faith, often using extreme measures to maintain this unity.
- Western Europe was strong enough to expand and engage with neighboring cultures.
- The Crusades were violent campaigns where Christians tried to challenge Islamic power in the eastern Mediterranean and largely failed, but they successfully reconquered Spain from Muslim rule.
- Through interactions with Muslims, Christians learned much about science, technology, and ideas.
- However, the prosperous era faced dramatic challenges in the fourteenth century with several disasters.
- There was uncertainty about whether medieval structures could withstand these pressures.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... Instead, in 1996, the United States was spending more money on the military than the rest of the world combined-four times as much as Russia, eight times as much as China, forty times as much as North Korea, eighty times as much as Iraq. It was a bizarre waste of the
nation's wealth.
A radical reduction of the military budget would require a renunciation of war, a refusal to use military solutions for international disputes. It would speak to the fundamental human desire (overwhelmed too often by barrages of superpatriotic slogans) to live at peace with others.
The public appeal for such a dramatic policy change would be based in a simple but powerful moral argument: that given the nature of modern warfare, the victims, by a ratio of 10:1, have been civilians. To put it another way, war in our time is always a war against children. And if the children of other countries are to be granted an equal right to life with our own children, then we must use our extraordinary human ingenuity to find nonmilitary solutions for world problems..."
"... Instead, in 1996, the United States was spending more money on the military than the rest of the world combined-four times as much as Russia, eight times as much as China, forty times as much as North Korea, eighty times as much as Iraq. It was a bizarre waste of the
nation's wealth.
A radical reduction of the military budget would require a renunciation of war, a refusal to use military solutions for international disputes. It would speak to the fundamental human desire (overwhelmed too often by barrages of superpatriotic slogans) to live at peace with others.
The public appeal for such a dramatic policy change would be based in a simple but powerful moral argument: that given the nature of modern warfare, the victims, by a ratio of 10:1, have been civilians. To put it another way, war in our time is always a war against children. And if the children of other countries are to be granted an equal right to life with our own children, then we must use our extraordinary human ingenuity to find nonmilitary solutions for world problems..."
Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
... Realizing the nation needed a single source of direction for the production effort, in 1943 Roosevelt created the Office of War Management (OWM), headed by former Supreme Court Justice (and FDR crony) James Byrnes. Byrnes soon demonstrated such great access to the president that people referred to him as the president’s assistant. Byrnes got the job done, allowing larger companies to make as much as they could, with profits tied strictly to numbers of units produced. The government had little regard for the cost of specific items—only performance and delivery mattered. The United States was rich enough to survive postwar debt and inflation, but there would be no surviving a victorious Hitler.
War costs demanded the largest loan the American government had ever received from its people, in the form of war bonds. Bond drives resulted in a deluge of money for the war. Yet it paled beside the demands for cash—$8 billion a month!—to combat the Axis. Between 1941 and 1945 the national debt skyrocketed, from $48 billion to $247 billion. As a share of GNP measured in constant dollars, this represented a 120–fold increase over pre-crash 1929 debt levels. This debt growth illustrated one reason isolationists were wary of war in the first place, and it also confirmed their fears about the rise of a permanent engorged bureaucracy..."
... Realizing the nation needed a single source of direction for the production effort, in 1943 Roosevelt created the Office of War Management (OWM), headed by former Supreme Court Justice (and FDR crony) James Byrnes. Byrnes soon demonstrated such great access to the president that people referred to him as the president’s assistant. Byrnes got the job done, allowing larger companies to make as much as they could, with profits tied strictly to numbers of units produced. The government had little regard for the cost of specific items—only performance and delivery mattered. The United States was rich enough to survive postwar debt and inflation, but there would be no surviving a victorious Hitler.
War costs demanded the largest loan the American government had ever received from its people, in the form of war bonds. Bond drives resulted in a deluge of money for the war. Yet it paled beside the demands for cash—$8 billion a month!—to combat the Axis. Between 1941 and 1945 the national debt skyrocketed, from $48 billion to $247 billion. As a share of GNP measured in constant dollars, this represented a 120–fold increase over pre-crash 1929 debt levels. This debt growth illustrated one reason isolationists were wary of war in the first place, and it also confirmed their fears about the rise of a permanent engorged bureaucracy..."
Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
... It might have been 'the Greatest Generation,' as the television journalist and author Tom Brokaw calls the cohort of Americans who lived through the era of World War II, but it was far less willing to go along with the war effort than we are led to believe. Moreover, the resistance to the national mobilization in the midst of what many believe to be the most patriotic era in American history helped give flower to stunningly renegade cultures.
Unlike in many other wars, when majorities of able-bodied men readily volunteered to fight for a cause, and despite loud and sustained calls by government officials for American men to enlist in the military, most Americans during World War II were less than eager to make the ultimate sacrifice of citizenship when called upon to do so. Some two-thirds of the American soldiers who fought in the war did not volunteer; they were drafted, which alone indicates that the desire of Americans to fight was limited..."
... It might have been 'the Greatest Generation,' as the television journalist and author Tom Brokaw calls the cohort of Americans who lived through the era of World War II, but it was far less willing to go along with the war effort than we are led to believe. Moreover, the resistance to the national mobilization in the midst of what many believe to be the most patriotic era in American history helped give flower to stunningly renegade cultures.
Unlike in many other wars, when majorities of able-bodied men readily volunteered to fight for a cause, and despite loud and sustained calls by government officials for American men to enlist in the military, most Americans during World War II were less than eager to make the ultimate sacrifice of citizenship when called upon to do so. Some two-thirds of the American soldiers who fought in the war did not volunteer; they were drafted, which alone indicates that the desire of Americans to fight was limited..."
The intricate tapestry of human misjudgment unfolds like a tragicomedy, reminiscent of a disoriented sailor navigating a tumultuous battlefield. We delve into the convoluted corridors of American history, where war and patriotism intertwine like awkward partners at a ball, offering all the excitement of a bland spaghetti dish with a side of indigestion.
Let's dissect this spectacle, shall we? We're encouraged to sip delicately from the cup of diverse perspectives as sophisticated historians sampling rare wines, steering clear of the boxed wine of oversimplified tales that leave a sour aftertaste. It's akin to attempting a gourmet feast amidst dumpster dining; sure, you might unearth morsels of truth, but you're still surrounded by rubbish.
And oh, the allure of ancient and medieval warfare! Leaders strutting like peacocks, chests puffed with the pride of conquest, while the commoners are crushed like grapes in a winepress. Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, their names echoing through history like distant thunder before a storm. But let's not forget the horrifying details, the rivers of blood and mountains of corpses they left in their wake.
Fast forward to the Middle Ages, where chivalry and honor were as common as the plague and just as deadly. Feudal lords playing their twisted version of musical chairs, knights jousting and raiding their way across lands, all in the name of crown and creed. It's enough to spoil one's appetite.
Let's throw these perspectives into the historical grinder and see what emerges. Ah, the eternal plea for reducing military budgets, a tune as old as time. Ancient Athenians wagged their fingers at the folly of war, and medieval scholars shook their heads at regal madness. Yet, the melody remains the same, the folly's march reverberating through time like a scratched record.
And what of wartime mobilization, that grand display of efficiency and sacrifice? Ancient Rome bestowed dictatorial powers upon its rulers, and medieval kings roused their subjects to the clamor of horns and drums. It's all so stirring, so heroic, until one recalls the countless lives sacrificed for the altar of victory.
But behold, dissension brews among the ranks! A lone voice cries out, challenging the wisdom of war and the blindness of patriotism. Ancient Athenians bicker over foreign entanglements, medieval skeptics scoff at holy crusades—history adores a rebel.
What revelations do we uncover from this whirlwind journey through human folly? That war is indeed hell, patriotism a two-faced coin, and governments possess an uncanny knack for leading us down the garden path to destruction. But there's more to this story, a deeper understanding that awaits our exploration.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Let's dissect this spectacle, shall we? We're encouraged to sip delicately from the cup of diverse perspectives as sophisticated historians sampling rare wines, steering clear of the boxed wine of oversimplified tales that leave a sour aftertaste. It's akin to attempting a gourmet feast amidst dumpster dining; sure, you might unearth morsels of truth, but you're still surrounded by rubbish.
And oh, the allure of ancient and medieval warfare! Leaders strutting like peacocks, chests puffed with the pride of conquest, while the commoners are crushed like grapes in a winepress. Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, their names echoing through history like distant thunder before a storm. But let's not forget the horrifying details, the rivers of blood and mountains of corpses they left in their wake.
Fast forward to the Middle Ages, where chivalry and honor were as common as the plague and just as deadly. Feudal lords playing their twisted version of musical chairs, knights jousting and raiding their way across lands, all in the name of crown and creed. It's enough to spoil one's appetite.
Let's throw these perspectives into the historical grinder and see what emerges. Ah, the eternal plea for reducing military budgets, a tune as old as time. Ancient Athenians wagged their fingers at the folly of war, and medieval scholars shook their heads at regal madness. Yet, the melody remains the same, the folly's march reverberating through time like a scratched record.
And what of wartime mobilization, that grand display of efficiency and sacrifice? Ancient Rome bestowed dictatorial powers upon its rulers, and medieval kings roused their subjects to the clamor of horns and drums. It's all so stirring, so heroic, until one recalls the countless lives sacrificed for the altar of victory.
But behold, dissension brews among the ranks! A lone voice cries out, challenging the wisdom of war and the blindness of patriotism. Ancient Athenians bicker over foreign entanglements, medieval skeptics scoff at holy crusades—history adores a rebel.
What revelations do we uncover from this whirlwind journey through human folly? That war is indeed hell, patriotism a two-faced coin, and governments possess an uncanny knack for leading us down the garden path to destruction. But there's more to this story, a deeper understanding that awaits our exploration.
THE RUNDOWN
- Contrasting perspectives on American history, particularly regarding war and patriotism, offer nuanced insights into the complexities of historical events.
- Ancient and medieval warfare, while glorified for expansion and defense, also inflicted immense human suffering on civilian populations.
- Advocating for a reduction in military spending echoes ancient and medieval calls for diplomacy and peaceful coexistence as alternatives to militarism.
- Praise for American wartime production during World War II mirrors historical narratives of unity and sacrifice in times of crisis, emphasizing efficiency and victory.
- Dissenting views on American participation in World War II challenge the notion of unanimous support for war efforts, reflecting historical tensions between individual freedoms and state obligations.
- Studying these perspectives in contemporary times prompts critical reflection on the role of the military, the ethics of warfare, and the trade-offs between security and civil liberties.
QUESTIONS
- In what ways did ancient and medieval warfare glorify expansion and defense, and how did this contrast with the immense human suffering inflicted on civilian populations?
- In what ways did ancient and medieval warfare both glorify expansion and defense while also inflicting immense suffering on civilian populations? How do these historical accounts shape our understanding of contemporary conflicts and the treatment of civilian populations in modern warfare?
- Advocates for a reduction in military spending often cite diplomacy and peaceful coexistence as viable alternatives to militarism. How do these calls for diplomacy mirror ancient and medieval approaches to resolving conflicts? What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of prioritizing diplomatic solutions over military intervention in the modern era?
The Roman Army. Google Images
Prepare to be transported into the captivating realm of historical films and videos. Brace yourselves for a mind-bending odyssey through time as we embark on a cinematic expedition. Within these flickering frames, the past morphs into a vivid tapestry of triumphs, tragedies, and transformative moments that have shaped the very fabric of our existence. We shall immerse ourselves in a whirlwind of visual narratives, dissecting the nuances of artistic interpretations, examining the storytelling techniques, and voraciously devouring historical accuracy with the ferocity of a time-traveling historian. So strap in, hold tight, and prepare to have your perception of history forever shattered by the mesmerizing lens of the camera.
THE RUNDOWN
In a realm where the raw essence of humanity still thrives, this video offers a glimpse into the indomitable spirits who once traversed the wilds of the Scottish highlands. Let's kick things off with Fraser Dundee, a name as Scottish as a ceilidh on a misty loch, born when the bubonic plague was making its debut tour around Europe. Imagine the Highlands, circa 1287. A land where sheep hold sway over people and the weather's mood swings could put a hormonal teenager to shame. Scottish clans weren't just family trees; they were intricate tangles of loyalty, betrayal, and more drama than a Shakespearean play. Have they ever heard of the Campbell-McDonald feud? Picture two obstinate clans locked in a centuries-old grudge match, making the Hatfields and McCoys seem to be merely bickering over the last slice of pizza. And let's chat about those kilts, shall we? Sure, they might seem like a fashion statement now, but back then, they were the original Swiss Army knife of survival gear. Need to blend into the scenery? Check. Suddenly, do you feel like giving your enemies an unexpected mooning mid-battle? Double-check. Kilts were the ultimate medieval fashion accessory.
But it wasn't all tartan and bagpipes. The Scots had a bone to pick with the English, and they weren't about to let a little thing like being outnumbered dampen their spirits. Cue William Wallace, whose battle cry could send shivers down even the bravest spine. And Robert the Bruce, the master of playing the long game. We've got battles like Stirling Bridge and Falkirk, where the Scots proved to the English that they were anything but pushovers in plaid. And let's not overlook the Jacobite uprisings, where not even the dreary Scottish weather could quell their fiery resolve. Through it all, one thing's for sure: the Scots weren't just fierce warriors; they were as stubborn as a mule and proud as a peacock.
In a realm where the raw essence of humanity still thrives, this video offers a glimpse into the indomitable spirits who once traversed the wilds of the Scottish highlands. Let's kick things off with Fraser Dundee, a name as Scottish as a ceilidh on a misty loch, born when the bubonic plague was making its debut tour around Europe. Imagine the Highlands, circa 1287. A land where sheep hold sway over people and the weather's mood swings could put a hormonal teenager to shame. Scottish clans weren't just family trees; they were intricate tangles of loyalty, betrayal, and more drama than a Shakespearean play. Have they ever heard of the Campbell-McDonald feud? Picture two obstinate clans locked in a centuries-old grudge match, making the Hatfields and McCoys seem to be merely bickering over the last slice of pizza. And let's chat about those kilts, shall we? Sure, they might seem like a fashion statement now, but back then, they were the original Swiss Army knife of survival gear. Need to blend into the scenery? Check. Suddenly, do you feel like giving your enemies an unexpected mooning mid-battle? Double-check. Kilts were the ultimate medieval fashion accessory.
But it wasn't all tartan and bagpipes. The Scots had a bone to pick with the English, and they weren't about to let a little thing like being outnumbered dampen their spirits. Cue William Wallace, whose battle cry could send shivers down even the bravest spine. And Robert the Bruce, the master of playing the long game. We've got battles like Stirling Bridge and Falkirk, where the Scots proved to the English that they were anything but pushovers in plaid. And let's not overlook the Jacobite uprisings, where not even the dreary Scottish weather could quell their fiery resolve. Through it all, one thing's for sure: the Scots weren't just fierce warriors; they were as stubborn as a mule and proud as a peacock.
Welcome to the mind-bending Key Terms extravaganza of our history class learning module. Brace yourselves; we will unravel the cryptic codes, secret handshakes, and linguistic labyrinths that make up the twisted tapestry of historical knowledge. These key terms are the Rosetta Stones of our academic journey, the skeleton keys to unlocking the enigmatic doors of comprehension. They're like historical Swiss Army knives, equipped with blades of definition and corkscrews of contextual examples, ready to pierce through the fog of confusion and liberate your intellectual curiosity. By harnessing the power of these mighty key terms, you'll possess the superhuman ability to traverse the treacherous terrains of primary sources, surf the tumultuous waves of academic texts, and engage in epic battles of historical debate. The past awaits, and the key terms are keys to unlocking its dazzling secrets.
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
- 480 BCE - Battle of Thermopylae
- 390 BCE - Sack of Rome by the Gauls
- 331 BCE - Battle of Gaugamela
- 202 BCE - Battle of Zama
- 70 CE - Siege of Jerusalem
- 9 CE - Battle of the Teutoburg Forest
- 410 CE - Sack of Rome by Alaric I
- 451 CE - Battle of Chalons
- 732 CE - Battle of Tours
- 845 CE - Viking Siege of Paris
- 1066 CE - Battle of Hastings
- 1204 CE - Sack of Constantinople
- 1212 CE - Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa
- 1213 CE - Battle of Muret
- 1291 CE - Siege of Acre
- 1314 CE - Battle of Bannockburn
- 1365 CE - Sack of Alexandria
- 1356 CE - Battle of Poitiers
- 1415 CE - Battle of Agincourt
- 1485 CE - Battle of Bosworth Field
DISCLAIMER: Welcome scholars to the wild and wacky world of history class. This isn't your granddaddy's boring ol' lecture, baby. We will take a trip through time, which will be one wild ride. I know some of you are in a brick-and-mortar setting, while others are in the vast digital wasteland. But fear not; we're all in this together. Online students might miss out on some in-person interaction, but you can still join in on the fun. This little shindig aims to get you all engaged with the course material and understand how past societies have shaped the world we know today. We'll talk about revolutions, wars, and other crazy stuff. So get ready, kids, because it's going to be one heck of a trip. And for all, you online students out there, don't be shy. Please share your thoughts and ideas with the rest of us. The Professor will do his best to give everyone an equal opportunity to learn, so don't hold back. So, let's do this thing!
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Objective:
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Objective:
Activity #2: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for the pièce de résistance of this classroom module - the summary section. As we embark on this tantalizing journey, we'll savor the exquisite flavors of knowledge, highlighting the fundamental ingredients and spices that have seasoned our minds throughout these captivating lessons. Prepare to indulge in a savory recap that will leave your intellectual taste buds tingling, serving as a passport to further enlightenment.
Once upon a time, in lands as ancient as the sand-dusted tombs of Egypt, humans were all about spicing up life with an excellent old-fashioned conflict. Egypt, Greece, and Rome were like drama queens, always up for a territorial tango or a power play. War was their version of a high-stakes game night, except the pieces were soldiers, and the winner took home more than just bragging rights.
Medieval Europe wasn't any better, swapping chess for a bloodier game of thrones. Lords and kings paraded around like peacocks with attitude, settling disputes with swords instead of words. Feudal feuds were like neighborhood drama but with armor and a distinct lack of homeowner association rules. And those Crusades? Talk about turning religion into a chaotic carnival ride. People were so excited about faith that they'd trek halfway around the world to plant a flag.
But wait, there's more! The Catholic Church fancied itself the ultimate spiritual micromanager. The Inquisition was their version of a spring cleaning spree — out with the heretics, in with the orthodox. Step out of line, and you might be in a roasting hot seat faster than you can say, "Hallelujah."
And let's not forget our guilty pleasures, those little indulgences that make life enjoyable. Ancient Greeks loved their wine almost as much as they loved debating it. Meanwhile, the Chinese were anti-opium trendsetters, realizing that getting high wasn't exactly the path to enlightenment.
Let's zip to the good ol' US of A—land of the free, home of the brave, and avid war enthusiasts. We have a knack for conflict — it's our national hobby. We've done everything from fighting for freedom to duking it out over oil. But let's not sugarcoat it: war stinks. Innocent folks caught in the chaos, families torn apart like flimsy tissue paper, all in the name of patriotism.
And don't even get me started on World War II. Sure, it's hailed as the big showdown of good versus evil, but there are always those who peek behind the curtain. Not everyone was waving the flag and chanting the national anthem. Some saw through the smoke and mirrors, realizing that war isn't the ultimate problem solver.
It's not all gloom and doom. History is more than just about reliving past blunders and learning from them. It's about untangling the messy knot of human nature and understanding why we do what we do.
or, in other words:
Medieval Europe wasn't any better, swapping chess for a bloodier game of thrones. Lords and kings paraded around like peacocks with attitude, settling disputes with swords instead of words. Feudal feuds were like neighborhood drama but with armor and a distinct lack of homeowner association rules. And those Crusades? Talk about turning religion into a chaotic carnival ride. People were so excited about faith that they'd trek halfway around the world to plant a flag.
But wait, there's more! The Catholic Church fancied itself the ultimate spiritual micromanager. The Inquisition was their version of a spring cleaning spree — out with the heretics, in with the orthodox. Step out of line, and you might be in a roasting hot seat faster than you can say, "Hallelujah."
And let's not forget our guilty pleasures, those little indulgences that make life enjoyable. Ancient Greeks loved their wine almost as much as they loved debating it. Meanwhile, the Chinese were anti-opium trendsetters, realizing that getting high wasn't exactly the path to enlightenment.
Let's zip to the good ol' US of A—land of the free, home of the brave, and avid war enthusiasts. We have a knack for conflict — it's our national hobby. We've done everything from fighting for freedom to duking it out over oil. But let's not sugarcoat it: war stinks. Innocent folks caught in the chaos, families torn apart like flimsy tissue paper, all in the name of patriotism.
And don't even get me started on World War II. Sure, it's hailed as the big showdown of good versus evil, but there are always those who peek behind the curtain. Not everyone was waving the flag and chanting the national anthem. Some saw through the smoke and mirrors, realizing that war isn't the ultimate problem solver.
It's not all gloom and doom. History is more than just about reliving past blunders and learning from them. It's about untangling the messy knot of human nature and understanding why we do what we do.
or, in other words:
- Conflict was rampant before 1500 CE in regions like Egypt, Greece, and Rome, driven by territorial ambitions and power struggles.
- Medieval Europe saw frequent battles and raids as lords and kings vied for supremacy, while religious differences fueled conflicts such as the Crusades.
- The Catholic Church enforced its authority through events like the Inquisition, punishing dissenters harshly.
- Studying vices from ancient Greek wine culture to 19th-century Chinese anti-opium efforts provides insights into evolving societal norms and values.
- American history reflects the complexities of warfare, where glorification contrasts with the suffering inflicted on civilian populations.
- Contemporary examination of historical conflicts and vices offers nuanced insights into diplomacy, ethics, and the balance between security and civil liberties.
ASSIGNMENTS
Click Here to get the Midterm Study Guide
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #09
- Forum Discussion #9
- Midterm Due
Click Here to get the Midterm Study Guide
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #09
The Insider YouTube channel offers captivating explorations into the worlds of food, travel, lifestyle, and entertainment, delivering engaging content that keeps viewers informed and entertained. Watch the following:
Please answer the following question:
Considering the detailed critique of historical accuracy in media portrayals of warfare provided by the history teacher in the video, what do you think are the primary reasons behind the persistence of inaccurate depictions in movies and TV shows? How might the entertainment industry balance the need for engaging storytelling with a commitment to historical authenticity in such portrayals?
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
In the eternal tussle between Hollywood and history, picture yourself settled on your couch, popcorn in hand, primed to delve into epic battles of yore. But lo and behold, the history lover arrives, armed with wit instead of weapons, dissecting cinematic skirmishes with surgical precision, from medieval melees to World War I chaos. Each scene is scrutinized, fact separated from fiction with the finesse of a strategic mastermind, with humorous quips about Hollywood's penchant for exaggeration. Yet amidst the critique lies acknowledgment of cinematic brilliance when it accurately captures historical essence. Beneath the sarcasm lies a profound truth: the significance of historical accuracy in shaping our understanding of the past. Holding filmmakers accountable safeguards our collective memory from Hollywood's whims. So, as you revel in cinematic battles, heed the words of our sage history teacher, for those who ignore history are doomed to endure historically inaccurate movies forever—a fate indeed worse than any on-screen battle.
Considering the detailed critique of historical accuracy in media portrayals of warfare provided by the history teacher in the video, what do you think are the primary reasons behind the persistence of inaccurate depictions in movies and TV shows? How might the entertainment industry balance the need for engaging storytelling with a commitment to historical authenticity in such portrayals?
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
In the eternal tussle between Hollywood and history, picture yourself settled on your couch, popcorn in hand, primed to delve into epic battles of yore. But lo and behold, the history lover arrives, armed with wit instead of weapons, dissecting cinematic skirmishes with surgical precision, from medieval melees to World War I chaos. Each scene is scrutinized, fact separated from fiction with the finesse of a strategic mastermind, with humorous quips about Hollywood's penchant for exaggeration. Yet amidst the critique lies acknowledgment of cinematic brilliance when it accurately captures historical essence. Beneath the sarcasm lies a profound truth: the significance of historical accuracy in shaping our understanding of the past. Holding filmmakers accountable safeguards our collective memory from Hollywood's whims. So, as you revel in cinematic battles, heed the words of our sage history teacher, for those who ignore history are doomed to endure historically inaccurate movies forever—a fate indeed worse than any on-screen battle.
Hey, welcome to the work cited section! Here's where you'll find all the heavy hitters that inspired the content you've just consumed. Some might think citations are as dull as unbuttered toast, but nothing gets my intellectual juices flowing like a good reference list. Don't get me wrong, just because we've cited a source; doesn't mean we're always going to see eye-to-eye. But that's the beauty of it - it's up to you to chew on the material and come to conclusions. Listen, we've gone to great lengths to ensure these citations are accurate, but let's face it, we're all human. So, give us a holler if you notice any mistakes or suggest more sources. We're always looking to up our game. Ultimately, it's all about pursuing knowledge and truth.
Work Cited:
Work Cited:
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Disclaimer: This learning module was primarily created by the professor with the assistance of AI technology. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, please note that the AI's contribution was limited to some regions of the module. The professor takes full responsibility for the content of this module and any errors or omissions therein. This module is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice or consultation. The professor and AI cannot be held responsible for any consequences arising from using this module.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.