Module Fourteen: Brushing Up
Once upon a time, in the dizzying whirl of Western civilization post-1500 CE, art donned new masks and led a merry parade through centuries of upheaval, brilliance, and downright absurdity. The Renaissance erupted like a jubilant phoenix, shaking off medieval dust with a flourish of humanism and anatomical precision that would make even the stiffest scholar blush. Picture Leonardo da Vinci—the quintessential polymath, the original multi-tasker—splattering his genius on canvas and parchment, conjuring the enigmatic smile of the "Mona Lisa" and the haunting tableau of "The Last Supper." Meanwhile, Michelangelo, chisel in hand, transformed marble into the ethereal figures of the Sistine Chapel ceiling, each sculpted muscle a divine drama unfolding.
This was an age of rebirth, where human potential and classical wisdom waltzed together, setting the stage for the forthcoming age of rationality. The Renaissance wasn't just an artistic movement but the grand opening act for modern thought, heralding an era where questioning and empirical observation would soon take center stage.
Transport yourself to the Baroque period, a time of contrasts where light and shadow danced with dramatic flair. Caravaggio's chiaroscuro technique turned biblical narratives into gritty street dramas, while Rembrandt's introspective portraits shimmered with profound humanity. The Baroque was a spectacle, an artistic rollercoaster that left viewers breathless, followed by the Rococo, a period of art that was as extravagant as a powdered wig and as sweet as a sugar rush. Fragonard's "The Swing" embodied this frothy delight, capturing the frills and follies of an aristocracy on the brink of revolution.
Step into the Enlightenment, an era where reason reigned supreme, and Neoclassicism resurrected the stoic grandeur of ancient Greece and Rome. Jacques-Louis David painted revolutionary zeal with "The Death of Socrates" and "The Oath of the Horatii," embedding Enlightenment ideals into the very fabric of his art. Here, art and politics intertwined, each brushstroke a manifesto, each canvas a battlefield for new ideas, providing us with a vivid window into the intellectual and social climate of the time.
In the 19th century, they stormed in with Romanticism's emotional tempests and Realism's stark social commentaries. Goya's "The Third of May 1808" screamed the horrors of war, while Delacroix's "Liberty Leading the People" hoisted the banner of revolution high. Realism grounded us, and Courbet and Millet painted the grit and grime of everyday life accurately and unidealized. Along came the Impressionists, rebels with a cause, dabbing light and color to capture fleeting moments. Monet's "Impression, Sunrise" was a gentle revolution, a luminous whisper that forever changed the art world.
In the 20th century, artists burst forth with innovation, discarding tradition with a daring flourish. Picasso's Cubism shattered reality itself, Dalí's Surrealism melted clocks and minds alike, and Pollock's Abstract Expressionism transformed the act of painting into a frenzied dance. These artists didn't just paint—they redefined what art could be, each movement a bold defiance against conformity, inviting us to question and reimagine the world around us.
Studying this tumultuous journey of post-1500 Western art is not merely an academic exercise; it's a profound exploration into the indomitable spirit of human creativity. From the Renaissance's humanism that ignited modern science to the Baroque drama that mirrored the upheaval of its era, art has persistently been both a mirror and a catalyst of change. It stands as a testament to humanity's unwavering pursuit to comprehend itself and the world, even in the most chaotic of times.
Through this labyrinthine journey, we learn to decode our ancestors' visual language and appreciate the audacious spirit that pushed artists to break every boundary. We see how art, in all its forms, has survived and thrived amidst the chaos, forever entwining beauty and truth in the most unexpected ways. So, let's raise a toast to the artists—those audacious creators who, with every stroke and sculpture, dared to transform their world and ours.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
This was an age of rebirth, where human potential and classical wisdom waltzed together, setting the stage for the forthcoming age of rationality. The Renaissance wasn't just an artistic movement but the grand opening act for modern thought, heralding an era where questioning and empirical observation would soon take center stage.
Transport yourself to the Baroque period, a time of contrasts where light and shadow danced with dramatic flair. Caravaggio's chiaroscuro technique turned biblical narratives into gritty street dramas, while Rembrandt's introspective portraits shimmered with profound humanity. The Baroque was a spectacle, an artistic rollercoaster that left viewers breathless, followed by the Rococo, a period of art that was as extravagant as a powdered wig and as sweet as a sugar rush. Fragonard's "The Swing" embodied this frothy delight, capturing the frills and follies of an aristocracy on the brink of revolution.
Step into the Enlightenment, an era where reason reigned supreme, and Neoclassicism resurrected the stoic grandeur of ancient Greece and Rome. Jacques-Louis David painted revolutionary zeal with "The Death of Socrates" and "The Oath of the Horatii," embedding Enlightenment ideals into the very fabric of his art. Here, art and politics intertwined, each brushstroke a manifesto, each canvas a battlefield for new ideas, providing us with a vivid window into the intellectual and social climate of the time.
In the 19th century, they stormed in with Romanticism's emotional tempests and Realism's stark social commentaries. Goya's "The Third of May 1808" screamed the horrors of war, while Delacroix's "Liberty Leading the People" hoisted the banner of revolution high. Realism grounded us, and Courbet and Millet painted the grit and grime of everyday life accurately and unidealized. Along came the Impressionists, rebels with a cause, dabbing light and color to capture fleeting moments. Monet's "Impression, Sunrise" was a gentle revolution, a luminous whisper that forever changed the art world.
In the 20th century, artists burst forth with innovation, discarding tradition with a daring flourish. Picasso's Cubism shattered reality itself, Dalí's Surrealism melted clocks and minds alike, and Pollock's Abstract Expressionism transformed the act of painting into a frenzied dance. These artists didn't just paint—they redefined what art could be, each movement a bold defiance against conformity, inviting us to question and reimagine the world around us.
Studying this tumultuous journey of post-1500 Western art is not merely an academic exercise; it's a profound exploration into the indomitable spirit of human creativity. From the Renaissance's humanism that ignited modern science to the Baroque drama that mirrored the upheaval of its era, art has persistently been both a mirror and a catalyst of change. It stands as a testament to humanity's unwavering pursuit to comprehend itself and the world, even in the most chaotic of times.
Through this labyrinthine journey, we learn to decode our ancestors' visual language and appreciate the audacious spirit that pushed artists to break every boundary. We see how art, in all its forms, has survived and thrived amidst the chaos, forever entwining beauty and truth in the most unexpected ways. So, let's raise a toast to the artists—those audacious creators who, with every stroke and sculpture, dared to transform their world and ours.
THE RUNDOWN
- The Renaissance (late 15th century): Marked by a revival of classical learning, the Renaissance saw artists like Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo create masterpieces that blended art and science, exemplified by works such as the "Mona Lisa" and the Sistine Chapel ceiling.
- The Baroque Period (1600-1750): Characterized by dramatic and emotional art, this era featured artists like Caravaggio and Rembrandt, who used strong contrasts of light and dark in works like "The Calling of St Matthew" and "The Night Watch."
- Rococo Style (early 18th century): Known for its ornate and decorative approach, Rococo art, exemplified by Jean-Honoré Fragonard's "The Swing," reflected the playful elegance and extravagance of the French aristocracy before the Revolution.
- Neoclassicism and the Enlightenment (late 17th to 18th century): Influenced by ancient Greek and Roman art, Neoclassicism, with artists like Jacques-Louis David, promoted Enlightenment ideals of reason and moral integrity through works like "The Death of Socrates."
- 19th Century Artistic Movements: This century saw the rise of Romanticism, Realism, and Impressionism, with artists like Francisco Goya, Gustave Courbet, and Claude Monet depicting emotion, social realities, and the effects of light in works such as "The Third of May 1808," "The Stone Breakers," and "Impression, Sunrise."
- 20th Century Modernism and Beyond: Featuring groundbreaking movements like Cubism, Surrealism, and Abstract Expressionism, artists such as Pablo Picasso, Salvador Dalí, and Jackson Pollock revolutionized art with innovative techniques and concepts, seen in pieces like "Les Demoiselles d'Avignon," "The Persistence of Memory," and Pollock's drip paintings.
QUESTIONS
- Explore how Pablo Picasso's "Les Demoiselles d'Avignon" challenged traditional art conventions. What innovations in style and technique did Picasso introduce through Cubism?
Discuss how Salvador Dalí's "The Persistence of Memory" explores concepts of time and reality. How does Surrealism aim to provoke thought and challenge perceptions through art?
Analyze Jackson Pollock's drip paintings in the context of Abstract Expressionism. How do Pollock's techniques and methods reflect emotional expression and spontaneity?
#14: Expertise Is Not Real
History—a place where academics play intellectual Jenga with facts, and the internet is flooded with quick-fix history lessons. Do you think navigating city traffic is tricky? Try sifting through the maze of historical "facts."
Specialization has turned history into a smorgasbord of oddly specific interests. We've got folks who can tell you about 14th-century French farming but wouldn’t recognize a meme if it danced in front of them. And academia? It's like a pressure cooker where the rush to publish can spawn theories wild enough to rival a tinfoil hat convention. Sometimes, it feels like a contest of "Who Can Spice Up History the Most?" and, surprise, it often results in a tie with far-fetched theories and eyebrow-raising claims.
Then there's the digital revolution, where everyone and their goldfish can claim to be a historian. With platforms like YouTube, historical expertise has been democratized to the point where your pet hamster might be lecturing on the Industrial Revolution. While entertaining, we often sacrifice depth, research, and context for snazzy graphics and bite-sized narratives. We've swapped scholarly rigor for clickbait, drowning many in misinformation and mistaking internet comments for academic journals.
Consider Christopher Columbus. Once celebrated as America's "discoverer" (ignoring those who were already here), he's now seen through a lens that highlights the darker aspects of colonialism. It's like finding out your childhood idol was the villain in a B-movie. This shift isn't just a footnote; it mirrors our evolving social consciousness as we reevaluate our heroes, confront our past, and come to terms with uncomfortable truths.
So, who should we trust in this historical maze? The experts with their ivory tower credentials or the self-proclaimed history buffs with slick editing skills? It's a tricky choice. Blind faith in experts might send you into an academic jargon spiral while ignoring them could leave you clutching at conspiracy theories like they're life preservers.
But don't despair! History isn't just dusty books and pricey courses. It's a compass for navigating our messy world. By embracing its complexities, challenging narratives, and listening to those who've done their homework (both literally and figuratively), we can use history to understand ourselves and the world better.
Ultimately, history is about more than memorizing dates or reciting facts. It's about exploring the messy, human side of life. So, when you're lost in the historical maze, remember: it's okay to question, doubt, and even chuckle at the quirks of history. After all, a little historical perspective can be the sanity-saving sip of clarity we crave.
RUNDOWN
STATE OF THE WORLD
History—a place where academics play intellectual Jenga with facts, and the internet is flooded with quick-fix history lessons. Do you think navigating city traffic is tricky? Try sifting through the maze of historical "facts."
Specialization has turned history into a smorgasbord of oddly specific interests. We've got folks who can tell you about 14th-century French farming but wouldn’t recognize a meme if it danced in front of them. And academia? It's like a pressure cooker where the rush to publish can spawn theories wild enough to rival a tinfoil hat convention. Sometimes, it feels like a contest of "Who Can Spice Up History the Most?" and, surprise, it often results in a tie with far-fetched theories and eyebrow-raising claims.
Then there's the digital revolution, where everyone and their goldfish can claim to be a historian. With platforms like YouTube, historical expertise has been democratized to the point where your pet hamster might be lecturing on the Industrial Revolution. While entertaining, we often sacrifice depth, research, and context for snazzy graphics and bite-sized narratives. We've swapped scholarly rigor for clickbait, drowning many in misinformation and mistaking internet comments for academic journals.
Consider Christopher Columbus. Once celebrated as America's "discoverer" (ignoring those who were already here), he's now seen through a lens that highlights the darker aspects of colonialism. It's like finding out your childhood idol was the villain in a B-movie. This shift isn't just a footnote; it mirrors our evolving social consciousness as we reevaluate our heroes, confront our past, and come to terms with uncomfortable truths.
So, who should we trust in this historical maze? The experts with their ivory tower credentials or the self-proclaimed history buffs with slick editing skills? It's a tricky choice. Blind faith in experts might send you into an academic jargon spiral while ignoring them could leave you clutching at conspiracy theories like they're life preservers.
But don't despair! History isn't just dusty books and pricey courses. It's a compass for navigating our messy world. By embracing its complexities, challenging narratives, and listening to those who've done their homework (both literally and figuratively), we can use history to understand ourselves and the world better.
Ultimately, history is about more than memorizing dates or reciting facts. It's about exploring the messy, human side of life. So, when you're lost in the historical maze, remember: it's okay to question, doubt, and even chuckle at the quirks of history. After all, a little historical perspective can be the sanity-saving sip of clarity we crave.
RUNDOWN
- History is a complex realm where facts can be like Jenga blocks, easily shifted and rearranged.
- Specialization has led to a smorgasbord of niche historical interests, from 14th-century French farming to obscure memes.
- The digital age has democratized history but often sacrifices depth and context for flashy graphics and bite-sized narratives.
- Traditional heroes like Columbus are being reevaluated through a more critical lens, reflecting our evolving social consciousness.
- Trusting historical experts can be tricky, as blind faith can lead to academic jargon confusion, while skepticism can leave you lost in conspiracy theories.
- Ultimately, history serves as a compass in our messy world, helping us understand the human experience and navigate our complex past.
STATE OF THE WORLD
In 1503, the world was a vibrant tapestry of ambition, artistry, and audacity, each thread woven meticulously under the watchful eye of history. Picture Europe during the Renaissance, where luminaries like Leonardo da Vinci painted with regal finesse and Michelangelo sculpted marble with fiery passion. Meanwhile, China under Emperor Zhengde across Asia mingled silk-clad nobles with enigmatic scholars. At the same time, the Ottoman Empire, under Sultan Bayezid II, flourished with both sultan-like magnanimity and merchant-like cunning. In India, sultanates and the grandeur of the Vijayanagara Empire dazzled with their diversity and splendor. Venture into the Middle East, where the Safavid Empire in Persia courted mystics and mathematicians. At the same time, the Americas boasted the Aztec and Inca Empires, their cities gleaming with gold and ambition. Africa, a mosaic of states and empires, saw the Songhai Empire thrive in the west and the Swahili coast bustling with vibrant trade. The era was also marked by significant technological advancements, embodied by Gutenberg's printing press and navigators' voyages, which reshaped continents and trade routes like the storied Silk Road, stitching together cultures with silk, spices, and dreams. Amidst the drama, religion cast its influence from European cathedrals to Arabian minarets, while in the Americas and Africa, faith resonated through nature and ancestral echoes. 1503 thus marked a pivotal crossroads where humanity dared to dream in unprecedented colors, exchanging ideas as precious as gold amidst the swaggering empires, conspiring brushstrokes, and audacious maritime exploits shaping the tumultuous tapestries of centuries to come.
HIGHLIGHTS
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
The Reading section—a realm where our aspirations of enlightenment often clash with the harsh realities of procrastination and the desperate reliance on Google. We soldier on through dense texts, promised 'broadening perspectives' but often wrestling with existential dread and academic pressure. With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a strong cup of coffee, I'll be your guide on this wild journey from dusty tomes to the murky depths of postmodernism. In the midst of all the pretentious prose, there's a glimmer of insight: we're all in this together, united in our struggle to survive without losing our sanity.
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
READING
- Chapter 25. Superpower Struggles and Global Transformations: The Cold War,1945-1980s
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Sherman, Dennis, and Joyce Salisbury. The West in the World. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2013.
In the whirlwind of academia, where tweed jackets and discussions about the best coffee spot reign, Joyce Salisbury and Dennis Sherman stand out as the rebels of historical scholarship. Armed with Salisbury's Ph.D. in medieval history from Rutgers University and Sherman's academic journey from UC Berkeley to the University of Michigan, they challenge the conventional norms with their scholarly prowess and irreverent wit. Salisbury fearlessly delves into ancient violence with works like "The Blood of Martyrs" and uncovers forgotten tales of resilience in "The Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World." Meanwhile, Sherman, akin to an academic Indiana Jones, roams the globe contemplating French history in Parisian cafes and making history accessible with titles like "A Short History of Western Civilization." Together, they disrupt the ivory tower with their unapologetic approach and thirst for asking the tough questions.
As a dynamic duo, Salisbury and Sherman defy the stereotype of the stuffy historian. Their partnership merges Salisbury's pen, mightier than Excalibur itself, with Sherman's knack for weaving accessible narratives. They're not just scholars but cultural provocateurs challenging the status quo. So, here's to raising a glass (or a quill) to these academic renegades, who breathe life into the dusty corridors of historical scholarship with their relentless curiosity and scholarly swagger.
RUNDOWN
- Decades from 1945 to 1989 were marked by rapid global change and intense political competition.
- The Cold War dominated international relations, with the United States and Soviet Union leading opposing ideologies.
- Despite fears, the Cold War never escalated into direct conflict between these superpowers.
- Western societies during this period became more technologically advanced, prosperous, and culturally open.
- Western Europe, although overshadowed by the United States, maintained prosperity and dynamic growth.
- By the late 20th century, the West remained powerful but had to consider global perspectives and issues.
- 1989 marked a pivotal moment with dramatic changes in Eastern Europe, signaling a new historical era.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules.
Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... The New Deal gave federal money to put thousands of writers, artists, actors, and musicians to work-in a Federal Theatre Project, a Federal Writers Project, a Federal Art Project: murals were painted on public buildings; plays were put on for working-class audiences who had never seen a play; hundreds of books and pamphlets were written and published. People heard a symphony for the first time. It was an exciting flowering of arts for the people, such as had never happened before in American history, and which has not been duplicated since. But in 1939, with the country more stable and the New Deal reform impulse weakened, programs to subsidize the arts were eliminated.
When the New Deal was over, capitalism remained intact. The rich still controlled the nation's wealth, as well as its laws, courts, police, newspapers, churches, colleges. Enough help bad been given to enough people to make Roosevelt a hero to millions, but the same system that had brought depression and crisis-the system of waste, of inequality, of concern for profit over human need-remained..."
"... The New Deal gave federal money to put thousands of writers, artists, actors, and musicians to work-in a Federal Theatre Project, a Federal Writers Project, a Federal Art Project: murals were painted on public buildings; plays were put on for working-class audiences who had never seen a play; hundreds of books and pamphlets were written and published. People heard a symphony for the first time. It was an exciting flowering of arts for the people, such as had never happened before in American history, and which has not been duplicated since. But in 1939, with the country more stable and the New Deal reform impulse weakened, programs to subsidize the arts were eliminated.
When the New Deal was over, capitalism remained intact. The rich still controlled the nation's wealth, as well as its laws, courts, police, newspapers, churches, colleges. Enough help bad been given to enough people to make Roosevelt a hero to millions, but the same system that had brought depression and crisis-the system of waste, of inequality, of concern for profit over human need-remained..."
Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
...If Washington was 'the American Zeus, Moses, and Cincinnatus all rolled into one,' he was not without faults. His rather nebulous personal religion left him exposed and isolated. Many of his biographers trumpeted Washington’s faith, and a famous painting captures the colonial general praying in a snowy wood, but if Washington had any personal belief in Jesus Christ, he kept it well hidden. Like Franklin, Washington tended toward Deism, a general belief in a detached and impersonal God who plays no role in human affairs. At any rate, Washington approached his new duties with a sense that although he appealed frequently to the Almighty for help, he was going it alone, and for better or worse, the new government rested on his large shoulders..."
...If Washington was 'the American Zeus, Moses, and Cincinnatus all rolled into one,' he was not without faults. His rather nebulous personal religion left him exposed and isolated. Many of his biographers trumpeted Washington’s faith, and a famous painting captures the colonial general praying in a snowy wood, but if Washington had any personal belief in Jesus Christ, he kept it well hidden. Like Franklin, Washington tended toward Deism, a general belief in a detached and impersonal God who plays no role in human affairs. At any rate, Washington approached his new duties with a sense that although he appealed frequently to the Almighty for help, he was going it alone, and for better or worse, the new government rested on his large shoulders..."
Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
...The Roosevelt administration appreciated the efforts of the Hays Office, which was busily purifying Hollywood films according to the Motion Picture Production Code. In 1938 Eleanor Roosevelt wrote in Photoplay magazine that she was happy to see that movie producers had taken on the responsibility of 'creating good taste' in the American public. And without the slightest embarrassment, she declared that censorship and the narrowing of artistic expression served the national interest:
The highly cultured people of the world are those who have good taste … some things in literature and the arts have always presaged decadence. Those things must be kept from the drama if we are to promote good taste. Here is the great challenge to the movie producer of the future—will movies be an instrument in the development of good taste and are we growing up to be a nation with artistic knowledge and appreciation..."
...The Roosevelt administration appreciated the efforts of the Hays Office, which was busily purifying Hollywood films according to the Motion Picture Production Code. In 1938 Eleanor Roosevelt wrote in Photoplay magazine that she was happy to see that movie producers had taken on the responsibility of 'creating good taste' in the American public. And without the slightest embarrassment, she declared that censorship and the narrowing of artistic expression served the national interest:
The highly cultured people of the world are those who have good taste … some things in literature and the arts have always presaged decadence. Those things must be kept from the drama if we are to promote good taste. Here is the great challenge to the movie producer of the future—will movies be an instrument in the development of good taste and are we growing up to be a nation with artistic knowledge and appreciation..."
In the intricate tapestry of Western history, societal norms stand as the weavers of cultural governance, exerting a profound influence on the fabric of civilization. The drama of this governance, from the rigid sermons of early American Puritans to the bureaucratic complexities of the 20th century, unfolds with a tension and complexity that is both captivating and thought-provoking, underscoring the central theme of this essay.
Imagine the nascent American colonies, where cultural order was meticulously woven from the strands of religious doctrine and pragmatic necessity. Puritan preachers, their voices as stern as their broad-brimmed hats, expounded not only on eternal damnation but also on the communal moral fabric. Cotton Mather, that idealistic moralist, authored treatises thicker than the fog shrouding Boston, weaving tales of piety and communal duty tighter than the stays of a corset.
Amidst the sea of solemn piety, a figure of significant influence emerged, Benjamin Franklin, the ink-stained rogue with a passion for penny-saving. His autobiography navigated the paths of self-improvement, championing virtues like thrift and industry. Franklin's impact extended beyond founding libraries and dodging lightning bolts; he propagated a new gospel of individualism that earned the Founding Fathers' approving nods amid their powdered wigs, challenging the societal norms and leaving an indelible mark on cultural governance.
Fast forward to the jazz era of the 1930s, where Franklin D. Roosevelt, the man with a plan and a cigarette holder to match, confronted economic woes with the swagger of a card sharp. The New Deal, his trump card, unleashed a flurry of federal programs that rescued the nation from the abyss and catalyzed a cultural renaissance. Artists, writers, and performers flocked to projects funded by FDR's alphabet soup of initiatives, as murals sprang up like mushrooms after rain and theaters buzzed with plays that charmed factory workers and farmers alike.
Yet, restrain your applause, for with every surge of artistic liberty, the specter of censorship loomed. The Hays Office, a shadowy figure wielding a ruler in one hand and a moral compass in the other, imposed the Motion Picture Production Code faster than one could say "cut!" Eleanor Roosevelt lent her support in her sensible shoes to ensure Hollywood's stars marched in line akin to chorus girls in a kickline.
Today, the battle for cultural control, a struggle that has evolved into a more nuanced form, is deeply entrenched in the hallowed halls of academia and amplified through the digital megaphones of media giants. Education, a powerful tool, shapes minds like malleable clay, while cultural strongholds exert influence with the subtlety of a sledgehammer in a china shop. Ideas, like dandelion seeds, float on the urban breeze, sowing the thoughts of a populace with attention spans shorter than a Kardashian marriage. This underscores the ongoing relevance and urgency of the struggle for cultural control, a battle that we all must be aware of and engage in.
Yet, amid our strides and pontifications, the question of who wields cultural hegemony remains as elusive as a politician's pledge. Benjamin Rush, the 18th-century physician turned moral crusader, cautioned against the perils of moral laxity with the zeal of a televangelist on a fundraising spree. His calls for temperance and purity reverberate through time, prompting deep reflection on whether our bodies are temples or mere rental cars for our souls. His words, like a mirror, force us to confront our own beliefs and values.
Ultimately, as we peer through the prism of history, one truth becomes evident: cultural control is not confined to mere regulations and rulers. It is a nuanced dance between tradition and innovation, between the intricately woven tapestry of societal norms and the rebellious threads of individual expression. In their unique ways, Franklin and Roosevelt remind us that governance isn't just about policies; it's about the narratives we shape and the values we hold dear.
Thus, as we navigate the labyrinthine complexities of 21st-century existence, let us embrace the wisdom of satire and skepticism gleaned from our past. For within the clash of ideals and the symphony of cultural flux lies the pulse of a civilization, forever poised on the tightrope between conformity and chaos.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Imagine the nascent American colonies, where cultural order was meticulously woven from the strands of religious doctrine and pragmatic necessity. Puritan preachers, their voices as stern as their broad-brimmed hats, expounded not only on eternal damnation but also on the communal moral fabric. Cotton Mather, that idealistic moralist, authored treatises thicker than the fog shrouding Boston, weaving tales of piety and communal duty tighter than the stays of a corset.
Amidst the sea of solemn piety, a figure of significant influence emerged, Benjamin Franklin, the ink-stained rogue with a passion for penny-saving. His autobiography navigated the paths of self-improvement, championing virtues like thrift and industry. Franklin's impact extended beyond founding libraries and dodging lightning bolts; he propagated a new gospel of individualism that earned the Founding Fathers' approving nods amid their powdered wigs, challenging the societal norms and leaving an indelible mark on cultural governance.
Fast forward to the jazz era of the 1930s, where Franklin D. Roosevelt, the man with a plan and a cigarette holder to match, confronted economic woes with the swagger of a card sharp. The New Deal, his trump card, unleashed a flurry of federal programs that rescued the nation from the abyss and catalyzed a cultural renaissance. Artists, writers, and performers flocked to projects funded by FDR's alphabet soup of initiatives, as murals sprang up like mushrooms after rain and theaters buzzed with plays that charmed factory workers and farmers alike.
Yet, restrain your applause, for with every surge of artistic liberty, the specter of censorship loomed. The Hays Office, a shadowy figure wielding a ruler in one hand and a moral compass in the other, imposed the Motion Picture Production Code faster than one could say "cut!" Eleanor Roosevelt lent her support in her sensible shoes to ensure Hollywood's stars marched in line akin to chorus girls in a kickline.
Today, the battle for cultural control, a struggle that has evolved into a more nuanced form, is deeply entrenched in the hallowed halls of academia and amplified through the digital megaphones of media giants. Education, a powerful tool, shapes minds like malleable clay, while cultural strongholds exert influence with the subtlety of a sledgehammer in a china shop. Ideas, like dandelion seeds, float on the urban breeze, sowing the thoughts of a populace with attention spans shorter than a Kardashian marriage. This underscores the ongoing relevance and urgency of the struggle for cultural control, a battle that we all must be aware of and engage in.
Yet, amid our strides and pontifications, the question of who wields cultural hegemony remains as elusive as a politician's pledge. Benjamin Rush, the 18th-century physician turned moral crusader, cautioned against the perils of moral laxity with the zeal of a televangelist on a fundraising spree. His calls for temperance and purity reverberate through time, prompting deep reflection on whether our bodies are temples or mere rental cars for our souls. His words, like a mirror, force us to confront our own beliefs and values.
Ultimately, as we peer through the prism of history, one truth becomes evident: cultural control is not confined to mere regulations and rulers. It is a nuanced dance between tradition and innovation, between the intricately woven tapestry of societal norms and the rebellious threads of individual expression. In their unique ways, Franklin and Roosevelt remind us that governance isn't just about policies; it's about the narratives we shape and the values we hold dear.
Thus, as we navigate the labyrinthine complexities of 21st-century existence, let us embrace the wisdom of satire and skepticism gleaned from our past. For within the clash of ideals and the symphony of cultural flux lies the pulse of a civilization, forever poised on the tightrope between conformity and chaos.
THE RUNDOWN
- In early American colonies, Puritan preachers like Cotton Mather emphasized communal moral values alongside fears of eternal damnation, shaping cultural norms tightly bound by religious doctrine.
- Benjamin Franklin, known for his autobiography and advocacy of thrift and industry, challenged societal norms with a gospel of individualism during the Enlightenment, influencing America's founding ideals.
- Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal initiatives during the 1930s responded to economic crisis with federal programs that sparked a cultural renaissance, fostering art, literature, and theater across the nation.
- The Hays Office enforced the Motion Picture Production Code in the early 20th century, regulating content and reflecting societal values in Hollywood films under the scrutiny of figures like Eleanor Roosevelt.
- Today, cultural control persists through academia and digital media, shaping public discourse and societal norms with the subtlety of educational influence and the immediacy of digital platforms.
- Benjamin Rush's advocacy for moral purity in the 18th century continues to provoke debate on societal values, highlighting ongoing struggles over cultural hegemony and individual expression in Western history.
QUESTIONS
- How did the Motion Picture Production Code enforced by the Hays Office reflect and regulate societal values in early 20th-century Hollywood? What role did figures like Eleanor Roosevelt play in this regulatory process?
In what ways does academia shape public discourse and societal norms today? How does digital media influence these norms differently from historical methods of cultural control?
Why did Benjamin Rush's advocacy for moral purity provoke debate on societal values in the 18th century? How does this historical debate resonate with ongoing discussions about cultural hegemony and individual expression today?
Prepare to be transported into the captivating realm of historical films and videos. Brace yourselves for a mind-bending odyssey through time as we embark on a cinematic expedition. Within these flickering frames, the past morphs into a vivid tapestry of triumphs, tragedies, and transformative moments that have shaped the very fabric of our existence. We shall immerse ourselves in a whirlwind of visual narratives, dissecting the nuances of artistic interpretations, examining the storytelling techniques, and voraciously devouring historical accuracy with the ferocity of a time-traveling historian. So strap in, hold tight, and prepare to have your perception of history forever shattered by the mesmerizing lens of the camera.
THE RUNDOWN
Salvador Dali, the virtuoso of the absurd and grand architect of melting timepieces, surfed Surrealism's avant-garde wave post-World War I. He transformed this art movement into a Freudian collective therapy for a world scarred by unforgettable memories. His art, meticulously crafted like a mad scientist's blend of hallucinations and micro-dreams, beckoned viewers into a realm where time liquefied like ice cream in the sun and clocks dripped beyond reason's edge. Expelled from the Surrealist circle for fixations on mustachioed figures and eccentricities, Dali found new horizons in America, hobnobbing with icons like Hitchcock and Disney—imagine Mickey Mouse with drooping ears. Yet, critics pondered whether his focus shifted from profound artistry to showbiz glitz as fame grew. His life's final act unfolded dramatically, a telenovela of political controversies and artistic dry spells, leaving a legacy shimmering with brilliance and tarnish—a testament to an artist who dared to unravel reality's curtain and reveal a universe where even the kitchen sink danced to his unheard melody.
Salvador Dali, the virtuoso of the absurd and grand architect of melting timepieces, surfed Surrealism's avant-garde wave post-World War I. He transformed this art movement into a Freudian collective therapy for a world scarred by unforgettable memories. His art, meticulously crafted like a mad scientist's blend of hallucinations and micro-dreams, beckoned viewers into a realm where time liquefied like ice cream in the sun and clocks dripped beyond reason's edge. Expelled from the Surrealist circle for fixations on mustachioed figures and eccentricities, Dali found new horizons in America, hobnobbing with icons like Hitchcock and Disney—imagine Mickey Mouse with drooping ears. Yet, critics pondered whether his focus shifted from profound artistry to showbiz glitz as fame grew. His life's final act unfolded dramatically, a telenovela of political controversies and artistic dry spells, leaving a legacy shimmering with brilliance and tarnish—a testament to an artist who dared to unravel reality's curtain and reveal a universe where even the kitchen sink danced to his unheard melody.
Welcome to the mind-bending Key Terms extravaganza of our history class learning module. Brace yourselves; we will unravel the cryptic codes, secret handshakes, and linguistic labyrinths that make up the twisted tapestry of historical knowledge. These key terms are the Rosetta Stones of our academic journey, the skeleton keys to unlocking the enigmatic doors of comprehension. They're like historical Swiss Army knives, equipped with blades of definition and corkscrews of contextual examples, ready to pierce through the fog of confusion and liberate your intellectual curiosity. By harnessing the power of these mighty key terms, you'll possess the superhuman ability to traverse the treacherous terrains of primary sources, surf the tumultuous waves of academic texts, and engage in epic battles of historical debate. The past awaits, and the key terms are keys to unlocking its dazzling secrets.
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
- 1503 - Leonardo da Vinci and "Mona Lisa"
- 1512 - The Sistine Chapel
- 1606 - Caravaggio
- 1642 - Rembrandt
- 1656 - Diego Velázquez
- 1701 - Portrait of Louis XIV
- 1770 - The Blue Boy
- 1814 - Francisco Goya
- 1863 - Édouard Manet
- 1872 - Claude Monet
- 1884 - Georges Seurat
- 1889 - Vincent van Gogh
- 1893 - Edvard Munch
- 1907 - Pablo Picasso
- 1917 - Marcel Duchamp
- 1929 - Salvador Dalí
- 1942 - Nighthawks
- 1948 - Jackson Pollock
- 1950 - Mark Rothko
- 1962 - Andy Warhol
DISCLAIMER: Welcome scholars to the wild and wacky world of history class. This isn't your granddaddy's boring ol' lecture, baby. We will take a trip through time, which will be one wild ride. I know some of you are in a brick-and-mortar setting, while others are in the vast digital wasteland. But fear not; we're all in this together. Online students might miss out on some in-person interaction, but you can still join in on the fun. This little shindig aims to get you all engaged with the course material and understand how past societies have shaped the world we know today. We'll talk about revolutions, wars, and other crazy stuff. So get ready, kids, because it's going to be one heck of a trip. And for all, you online students out there, don't be shy. Please share your thoughts and ideas with the rest of us. The Professor will do his best to give everyone an equal opportunity to learn, so don't hold back. So, let's do this thing!
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Activity #2: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Activity #1: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Activity #2: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for the pièce de résistance of this classroom module - the summary section. As we embark on this tantalizing journey, we'll savor the exquisite flavors of knowledge, highlighting the fundamental ingredients and spices that have seasoned our minds throughout these captivating lessons. Prepare to indulge in a savory recap that will leave your intellectual taste buds tingling, serving as a passport to further enlightenment.
In the awe-inspiring realm of art history, where the whispers of past epochs reverberate in every brushstroke and chisel mark, we embark on a journey that transcends the confines of mere canvases and sculptures. It's a journey that threads through the intricate tapestry of human ambition and folly, inviting you to explore Western civilization's cultural zeniths and nadirs. Each artwork is a captivating storyteller, and every sculpted figure beckons with a mischievous grin, enticing you to unravel their narratives.
Our journey commences with the Renaissance, a transformative revival of classical ideals and humanism. Picture this: Leonardo da Vinci, a visionary akin to a medieval Dr. Frankenstein, meticulously studies long-departed bodies as if they were the treasures of a confectioner's shop. Meanwhile, perched on scaffolding, Michelangelo adorns the Sistine Chapel ceiling with a celestial graffiti wall, a testament to his singular genius. These masters were not mere painters—they were philosophers, grappling with the very essence of humanity and immortalizing it on ceilings and canvases with an enduring flair that defies the passage of time.
Now, prepare yourself for the Baroque era, where Caravaggio transforms chiaroscuro into the mic drop of the art world. His canvases are the divas of artistic expression, with shadows and passions so intense that you might think you stumbled into an Italian melodrama with superior lighting. Here, we witness a shift from the measured calm of the Renaissance to an emotional rollercoaster, as if artists suddenly realized emotions could be painted as vividly as muscle-bound saints.
Fast forward to the Rococo period, when Europe's elite embraced the mantra that excess was exquisite. Imagine Jean-Honoré Fragonard presenting "The Swing," a painting that's essentially an extravagant fantasy of billowing gowns, abundant gardens, and subtly suggestive swings. It's all a bit extravagant—a magnificently lavish peek into a realm where nobles danced in silk while the common folk likely danced in mud.
Naturally, every decadent gala must face a reckoning, and in strides, Neoclassicism is like the solemn guest ready to lecture on civic duty. Jacques-Louis David's "The Death of Socrates" isn't about revelry but the philosophical aftermath of too much of it. Suddenly, art transcends mere beauty—it becomes a conduit for truth and a catalyst for political upheaval. Who knew paintings could serve as manifestos?
Skipping ahead to the 19th century, we encounter Romanticism, Realism, and Impressionism—a triumvirate of artistic rebellion. Francisco Goya's "The Third of May 1808" starkly reminds us that war isn't all heroics and medals; it's messy, tragic, a canvas splattered with the hues of blood and defiance. Meanwhile, Monet's "Impression, Sunrise" captures a sunrise so ephemeral yet profound that it seems to paint the dew of morning directly onto your soul.
Prepare for the 20th century, where art plunges into the avant-garde abyss. Picasso, with his cubist escapades, decides faces are passé, and geometry is the new chic. Salvador Dalí plunges into the subconscious with melting clocks and whimsical mustaches, challenging our perception of reality as though we've wandered into a surrealist circus tent.
But wait—there's more! Art history isn't mere admiration of masterpieces; it's a profound study of cultural introspection. It's about discerning how these works mirror the rise and fall of civilizations, the clash of ideologies, and occasionally, the vanity of painters who believe themselves divine purveyors of aesthetics.
Why delve into this chaotic tapestry of human expression? Because beneath layers of oil and marble lies our collective narrative—the poignant, the poignant, and the positively bizarre. It beckons us to think critically, to look beyond brushstrokes and into the minds of artists who dared to defy convention.
As we navigate our labyrinthine 21st century, art history remains a beacon—a reminder that creativity is boundless, beauty subjective, and sometimes, a painting of a potato can fetch a princely sum (yes, Van Gogh, we see you).
In summation, art history isn't merely a parade of aesthetics—it's a mirror reflecting humanity's triumphs, flaws, and timeless quest for significance. So, let us metaphorically raise our brushes and toast the artists, rebels, and dreamers who dared to splash color onto the canvas of history. Here's to the exhilarating ride—it has genuinely been a masterpiece.
Or, in others words:
Our journey commences with the Renaissance, a transformative revival of classical ideals and humanism. Picture this: Leonardo da Vinci, a visionary akin to a medieval Dr. Frankenstein, meticulously studies long-departed bodies as if they were the treasures of a confectioner's shop. Meanwhile, perched on scaffolding, Michelangelo adorns the Sistine Chapel ceiling with a celestial graffiti wall, a testament to his singular genius. These masters were not mere painters—they were philosophers, grappling with the very essence of humanity and immortalizing it on ceilings and canvases with an enduring flair that defies the passage of time.
Now, prepare yourself for the Baroque era, where Caravaggio transforms chiaroscuro into the mic drop of the art world. His canvases are the divas of artistic expression, with shadows and passions so intense that you might think you stumbled into an Italian melodrama with superior lighting. Here, we witness a shift from the measured calm of the Renaissance to an emotional rollercoaster, as if artists suddenly realized emotions could be painted as vividly as muscle-bound saints.
Fast forward to the Rococo period, when Europe's elite embraced the mantra that excess was exquisite. Imagine Jean-Honoré Fragonard presenting "The Swing," a painting that's essentially an extravagant fantasy of billowing gowns, abundant gardens, and subtly suggestive swings. It's all a bit extravagant—a magnificently lavish peek into a realm where nobles danced in silk while the common folk likely danced in mud.
Naturally, every decadent gala must face a reckoning, and in strides, Neoclassicism is like the solemn guest ready to lecture on civic duty. Jacques-Louis David's "The Death of Socrates" isn't about revelry but the philosophical aftermath of too much of it. Suddenly, art transcends mere beauty—it becomes a conduit for truth and a catalyst for political upheaval. Who knew paintings could serve as manifestos?
Skipping ahead to the 19th century, we encounter Romanticism, Realism, and Impressionism—a triumvirate of artistic rebellion. Francisco Goya's "The Third of May 1808" starkly reminds us that war isn't all heroics and medals; it's messy, tragic, a canvas splattered with the hues of blood and defiance. Meanwhile, Monet's "Impression, Sunrise" captures a sunrise so ephemeral yet profound that it seems to paint the dew of morning directly onto your soul.
Prepare for the 20th century, where art plunges into the avant-garde abyss. Picasso, with his cubist escapades, decides faces are passé, and geometry is the new chic. Salvador Dalí plunges into the subconscious with melting clocks and whimsical mustaches, challenging our perception of reality as though we've wandered into a surrealist circus tent.
But wait—there's more! Art history isn't mere admiration of masterpieces; it's a profound study of cultural introspection. It's about discerning how these works mirror the rise and fall of civilizations, the clash of ideologies, and occasionally, the vanity of painters who believe themselves divine purveyors of aesthetics.
Why delve into this chaotic tapestry of human expression? Because beneath layers of oil and marble lies our collective narrative—the poignant, the poignant, and the positively bizarre. It beckons us to think critically, to look beyond brushstrokes and into the minds of artists who dared to defy convention.
As we navigate our labyrinthine 21st century, art history remains a beacon—a reminder that creativity is boundless, beauty subjective, and sometimes, a painting of a potato can fetch a princely sum (yes, Van Gogh, we see you).
In summation, art history isn't merely a parade of aesthetics—it's a mirror reflecting humanity's triumphs, flaws, and timeless quest for significance. So, let us metaphorically raise our brushes and toast the artists, rebels, and dreamers who dared to splash color onto the canvas of history. Here's to the exhilarating ride—it has genuinely been a masterpiece.
Or, in others words:
- There was a revival of classical learning in Europe, with artists like Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo merging art and science, producing iconic works such as the "Mona Lisa" and the Sistine Chapel ceiling.
- Characterized by dramatic art emphasizing emotion and realism, exemplified by Caravaggio's chiaroscuro technique and Rembrandt's introspective portraits, like "The Night Watch."
- Known for ornate and decorative art, reflecting the elegance and extravagance of the French aristocracy through works like Jean-Honoré Fragonard's "The Swing."
- Inspired by ancient Greek and Roman art, it promoted ideals of reason and moral integrity, as seen in Jacques-Louis David's neoclassical works, such as "The Death of Socrates."
- Romanticism, Realism, and Impressionism emerged, expressing emotion, social realities, and light effects in works like Francisco Goya's "The Third of May 1808" and Claude Monet's "Impression, Sunrise."
- Groundbreaking movements like Cubism, Surrealism, and Abstract Expressionism revolutionized art, with artists such as Picasso ("Les Demoiselles d'Avignon"), Dalí ("The Persistence of Memory"), and Pollock (drip paintings) challenging traditional artistic norms.
ASSIGNMENTS
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #15
- Forum Discussion #15
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #15
AMC+ is a streaming service offering a curated selection of AMC Networks' original series, movies, and exclusive content, available on-demand. Watch the following:
Please answer the following question:
Discuss the influence of societal concerns and cultural awareness on the development of comic book characters, using Stan Lee's creation of the X-Men as a case study. How did Lee's decision to make the X-Men mutants born with their powers reflect broader social issues of the time? Explain how Lee's approach to inclusivity in storytelling impacted the reception and longevity of the X-Men franchise in popular culture.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
Envision this: Stan Lee, the iconic comic book genius, reclining in his plush chair, surrounded by the swirling smoke of his cigar, his thoughts as vast as the cosmos. In his creative sanctuary, adorned with sketches of heroes and villains, Stan Lee, having conquered the world with Spider-Man and the Hulk, set his sights on new horizons. His sharp intellect rejected the tired tropes of radioactive spiders and gamma-ray accidents and instead proposed mutants—individuals born with innate powers. Renaming them the 'X-Men' in a stroke of brilliance, Stan wove these characters into a narrative that mirrored society's diversity and complexity. His stories, as vivid as Jack Kirby's art, subtly explored civil rights and embraced diversity, inviting readers to interpret without preaching. For Stan, comics were a thrilling carnival ride for the mind, not a soapbox. In his world, heroes had their moments, villains their motives, and every tale was a tightrope walk of storytelling with heart, grit, and a dash of irreverence, leaving us to ponder if heroes are born, made, or imagined in a tapestry where mutants shine more human than the rest of us.
Discuss the influence of societal concerns and cultural awareness on the development of comic book characters, using Stan Lee's creation of the X-Men as a case study. How did Lee's decision to make the X-Men mutants born with their powers reflect broader social issues of the time? Explain how Lee's approach to inclusivity in storytelling impacted the reception and longevity of the X-Men franchise in popular culture.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
Envision this: Stan Lee, the iconic comic book genius, reclining in his plush chair, surrounded by the swirling smoke of his cigar, his thoughts as vast as the cosmos. In his creative sanctuary, adorned with sketches of heroes and villains, Stan Lee, having conquered the world with Spider-Man and the Hulk, set his sights on new horizons. His sharp intellect rejected the tired tropes of radioactive spiders and gamma-ray accidents and instead proposed mutants—individuals born with innate powers. Renaming them the 'X-Men' in a stroke of brilliance, Stan wove these characters into a narrative that mirrored society's diversity and complexity. His stories, as vivid as Jack Kirby's art, subtly explored civil rights and embraced diversity, inviting readers to interpret without preaching. For Stan, comics were a thrilling carnival ride for the mind, not a soapbox. In his world, heroes had their moments, villains their motives, and every tale was a tightrope walk of storytelling with heart, grit, and a dash of irreverence, leaving us to ponder if heroes are born, made, or imagined in a tapestry where mutants shine more human than the rest of us.
Hey, welcome to the work cited section! Here's where you'll find all the heavy hitters that inspired the content you've just consumed. Some might think citations are as dull as unbuttered toast, but nothing gets my intellectual juices flowing like a good reference list. Don't get me wrong, just because we've cited a source; doesn't mean we're always going to see eye-to-eye. But that's the beauty of it - it's up to you to chew on the material and come to conclusions. Listen, we've gone to great lengths to ensure these citations are accurate, but let's face it, we're all human. So, give us a holler if you notice any mistakes or suggest more sources. We're always looking to up our game. Ultimately, it's all about pursuing knowledge and truth.
Work Cited:
Work Cited:
- UNDER CONSTRUCTION
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Disclaimer: This learning module was primarily created by the professor with the assistance of AI technology. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, please note that the AI's contribution was limited to some regions of the module. The professor takes full responsibility for the content of this module and any errors or omissions therein. This module is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice or consultation. The professor and AI cannot be held responsible for any consequences arising from using this module.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.