HST 201 Module #10
Module Ten: A Woman's Place (1848 CE-1853 CE)
The years 1848 to 1853 were crucial for the United States, as the country was going through a period of significant change and growth. These years saw important events such as the Mexican-American War, the Gold Rush, and the growing tensions over the issue of slavery. It is crucial to study this subject today because it provides a better understanding of the complex political, economic, and social factors that shaped the nation during this period.
One of the most significant events during this time was the Mexican-American War, which began in 1846 and ended in 1848 with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The war was fought over territorial disputes between the United States and Mexico, with the U.S. ultimately gaining control of much of the Southwest, including California, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Nevada, and Utah. This expansion of U.S. territory helped fuel the nation's manifest destiny, the belief that it was the nation's destiny to expand and control the entire continent from coast to coast.
The Gold Rush, which began in 1848, also played a significant role in shaping the nation's history during this period. With the discovery of gold in California, people from all over the world flocked to the region, leading to a population boom and the establishment of new towns and cities. This event had a profound impact on the nation's economy, as the influx of gold helped fuel the growth of businesses and industries.
However, the issue of slavery continued to be a contentious issue during this period. In 1850, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to ease tensions between the North and South by admitting California as a free state, while also allowing the practice of slavery in other parts of the territory. The compromise ultimately failed to address the underlying tensions over slavery, which would ultimately lead to the Civil War in 1861.
One positive outcome of this period was the growth of the abolitionist movement, which aimed to end the practice of slavery in the United States. Abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and William Lloyd Garrison used their voices and writings to raise awareness about the injustices of slavery and the need for its abolition. Their efforts ultimately helped lead to the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
In conclusion, the years 1848 to 1853 were a crucial period in U.S. history, marked by significant events such as the Mexican-American War, the Gold Rush, and the ongoing tensions over slavery. By studying this subject, we can gain a better understanding of the complex factors that shaped the nation during this period and the lasting impact these events had on the country.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Work Cited:
Johnson, Michael P. "The Mexican-American War and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo." American History: From Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
Brands, H.W. "The Gold Rush of 1849." American History: From Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
"Compromise of 1850." History.com. A&E Television Networks, LLC. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
Foner, Eric. "The Civil War." American History: From Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
"Abolitionist Movement." History.com. A&E Television Networks, LLC. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
The years 1848 to 1853 were crucial for the United States, as the country was going through a period of significant change and growth. These years saw important events such as the Mexican-American War, the Gold Rush, and the growing tensions over the issue of slavery. It is crucial to study this subject today because it provides a better understanding of the complex political, economic, and social factors that shaped the nation during this period.
One of the most significant events during this time was the Mexican-American War, which began in 1846 and ended in 1848 with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The war was fought over territorial disputes between the United States and Mexico, with the U.S. ultimately gaining control of much of the Southwest, including California, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Nevada, and Utah. This expansion of U.S. territory helped fuel the nation's manifest destiny, the belief that it was the nation's destiny to expand and control the entire continent from coast to coast.
The Gold Rush, which began in 1848, also played a significant role in shaping the nation's history during this period. With the discovery of gold in California, people from all over the world flocked to the region, leading to a population boom and the establishment of new towns and cities. This event had a profound impact on the nation's economy, as the influx of gold helped fuel the growth of businesses and industries.
However, the issue of slavery continued to be a contentious issue during this period. In 1850, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to ease tensions between the North and South by admitting California as a free state, while also allowing the practice of slavery in other parts of the territory. The compromise ultimately failed to address the underlying tensions over slavery, which would ultimately lead to the Civil War in 1861.
One positive outcome of this period was the growth of the abolitionist movement, which aimed to end the practice of slavery in the United States. Abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and William Lloyd Garrison used their voices and writings to raise awareness about the injustices of slavery and the need for its abolition. Their efforts ultimately helped lead to the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
In conclusion, the years 1848 to 1853 were a crucial period in U.S. history, marked by significant events such as the Mexican-American War, the Gold Rush, and the ongoing tensions over slavery. By studying this subject, we can gain a better understanding of the complex factors that shaped the nation during this period and the lasting impact these events had on the country.
THE RUNDOWN
- 1848-1853 was a crucial period in US history marked by significant events
- The Mexican-American War took place from 1846 to 1848, with the US gaining control of much of the Southwest
- The Gold Rush began in 1848, leading to a population boom and significant economic growth
- Tensions over the issue of slavery continued, and the Compromise of 1850 failed to address underlying tensions
- The period saw the growth of the abolitionist movement, which ultimately helped lead to the end of slavery in the US
- Studying this subject provides a better understanding of the complex political, economic, and social factors that shaped the nation during this period.
QUESTIONS
- How did the events of 1848-1853 shape the nation's manifest destiny?
- What was the impact of the Mexican-American War on U.S.-Mexico relations and the U.S.'s expansionist policies?
- How did the Gold Rush impact the nation's economy and settlement patterns?
Work Cited:
Johnson, Michael P. "The Mexican-American War and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo." American History: From Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
Brands, H.W. "The Gold Rush of 1849." American History: From Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
"Compromise of 1850." History.com. A&E Television Networks, LLC. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
Foner, Eric. "The Civil War." American History: From Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
"Abolitionist Movement." History.com. A&E Television Networks, LLC. Accessed 26 Apr. 2023.
#10 Remove the Term Un-American from Your Vocabulary
And as a bonus, don’t listen to anyone that uses the term “Un-American” as they surely have an agenda. With the first ten rules in place, you can seem where one would violate multiple rules before they violate number 11. As you scroll through social media, the nonsensical term “Un-American” is applied to any person or idea that doesn’t fit a certain narrative. You must ask yourself, what is American then? Is it a deep respect for the powers that be and the status quo? Is it a violent police state that subdues minorities? Is it a suppression of free speech and oligarchic control of a rigged election? Is its entrepreneurial spirit? A freedom both of mind and of economic choices? Is it seeking out the boundaries of science, technology, and culture in a manifest destiny approach? Is it apple pie?
The answer is, as to no one’s shock, maybe?
The human experience as well as the American experience is multifaceted and complex. The worldviews of a housewife from the 17th century will most certainly clash with those of a gay black man in the 1980s. And that is okay, there is room for many types of Americans to sit at the table. When a political pundit uses the term “Un-American” they are really saying that “you don’t belong here.” They want to dehumanize and demote any oppositional viewpoint or lifestyle. America means something to me, and it means something to you. It means something to Abraham Lincoln, and something completely different to Iraqi child soldier. We need to sit back and not validate each other’s worldviews, but validate that they exist.
The idea of "un-American" has been thrown around in the annals of American history. It's a label slapped onto folks, behaviors, or notions that go against what's deemed "American." But, let me tell you, dear reader, this concept is as flawed as a defective toaster. The idea of something being "Un-American" is pointless in the grand scheme of history. There is no such thing, really. Why? Because America is a tapestry of diverse cultures and ever-changing ways of being. Trying to confine a single set of values or beliefs as exclusively American is like fitting an elephant in a matchbox. It just isn't going to work.
So, let's not limit ourselves, shall we? Let's embrace the diversity that makes America, well, America. And let's leave the idea of "un-American" where it belongs - in the dustbin of history. As I sink my teeth into the idea of "un-American," a bitter taste lingers on my tongue. It's been used as a weapon of mass oppression, my friends. Back in the '50s, Senator Joseph McCarthy led a ruthless crusade to smoke out alleged commies and rebels hiding in plain sight within the government and beyond. His weapon of choice? An all-encompassing definition of "un-American," designed to cast a wide net that captured anyone remotely suspected of being a left-leaning sympathizer or associating with them. The results were catastrophic. Countless folks were scrutinized, ostracized, and even locked up without so much as a fair trial or a shred of evidence beyond rumors and political self-interest. It was a dark time in our nation's history when the idea of what it meant to be "American" was turned on its head.
In the grand scheme of things, the concept of being "un-American" has been employed as a tool for bias against those on the fringes of society. Take, for instance, the early 1900s, when southern and eastern European migrants were widely deemed "un-American" due to their distinct tongues, beliefs, and traditions. And let's not forget about the marginalization of African Americans and other non-white individuals who have been denied the opportunity to fully engage in American life based solely on their perceived lack of Americanness. The beauty of the American experiment lies in its lack of a rigid set of values and beliefs. It's a wild and unpredictable ride, full of twists and turns that keep us guessing. But that's what makes it all so damn exciting! The vast array of perspectives and experiences that contribute to the ongoing dialogue of what it truly means to be American is what keeps us pushing forward. This diversity is our ace in the hole, the secret weapon that has allowed us to weather any storm and emerge more robust and resilient than ever before. In the face of social, economic, and political upheaval, we adapt and evolve, like a chameleon changing colors in the blink of an eye. That's the American way, baby!
In the 1950s and 1960s, a mighty force arose in the land of America, challenging the notion that segregation and discrimination were woven into the nation's fabric. The civil rights movement, led by luminaries such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, drew upon the bedrock principles of democracy and equality enshrined in the Constitution to demand justice for African Americans. These valiant champions of freedom and equality rallied the masses to their cause, their impassioned speeches and bold actions striking fear into those who sought to maintain the status quo. Through their unwavering commitment to the cause, they succeeded in shifting the tide of public opinion, and their efforts culminated in the passage of historic civil rights legislation. Indeed, the civil rights movement stands as a testament to the indomitable spirit of the American people and their unyielding determination to uphold the values of justice and equality for all.
In the rich tapestry of American social movements, a particularly vibrant thread weaves through the struggle for LGBTQ rights. This dynamic movement boldly confronts the entrenched prejudices of our society and challenges the very foundations of gender and sexuality. Through tireless activism, LGBTQ individuals have galvanized a broader recognition of diversity and inclusivity, forever altering the fabric of American society. The LGBTQ movement is a testament to the power of individual voices and collective action to effect positive societal change. These brave voices, who have refused to be silenced or marginalized by the oppressive forces of conformity and intolerance, have propelled this movement forward. They have shone a light on the unjust labeling of "un-American," revealing the insidious nature of such discriminatory rhetoric.
Say, we must delve into the chronicles of the "un-American" notion to grasp how it's been wielded to further some causes and give the boot to certain factions throughout American annals. Acknowledging how the "un-American" concept's been used to legitimize prejudice and suppression, we can toil towards a more welcoming and just society that esteems variety and advances communal equity. As I wrap my head around this, I can't help but wonder: what the hell does "Un-American" even mean? Is it some catch-all phrase people use to justify their prejudices and biases? Let's be honest: America is a melting pot of cultures, beliefs, and ideas. It's a place where diversity thrives and innovation flourishes. Trying to boil all of that down into a single set of values or beliefs is not only limiting but also downright exclusionary.
But despite its flaws, the concept of "Un-American" has played a significant role in shaping our nation's history. It's been used to justify discrimination and repression, but it's also been challenged and subverted by social justice and equality movements. And that's the key. By understanding the complex and often messy history of "Un-American," we can work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society. A society that values diversity and recognizes that our differences are what make us strong. So let's move beyond this flawed concept and focus on building a future that embraces all that America offers. A future where everyone - regardless of their background or beliefs - can thrive and succeed.
THE RUNDOWN
THE STATE OF THE UNION
And as a bonus, don’t listen to anyone that uses the term “Un-American” as they surely have an agenda. With the first ten rules in place, you can seem where one would violate multiple rules before they violate number 11. As you scroll through social media, the nonsensical term “Un-American” is applied to any person or idea that doesn’t fit a certain narrative. You must ask yourself, what is American then? Is it a deep respect for the powers that be and the status quo? Is it a violent police state that subdues minorities? Is it a suppression of free speech and oligarchic control of a rigged election? Is its entrepreneurial spirit? A freedom both of mind and of economic choices? Is it seeking out the boundaries of science, technology, and culture in a manifest destiny approach? Is it apple pie?
The answer is, as to no one’s shock, maybe?
The human experience as well as the American experience is multifaceted and complex. The worldviews of a housewife from the 17th century will most certainly clash with those of a gay black man in the 1980s. And that is okay, there is room for many types of Americans to sit at the table. When a political pundit uses the term “Un-American” they are really saying that “you don’t belong here.” They want to dehumanize and demote any oppositional viewpoint or lifestyle. America means something to me, and it means something to you. It means something to Abraham Lincoln, and something completely different to Iraqi child soldier. We need to sit back and not validate each other’s worldviews, but validate that they exist.
The idea of "un-American" has been thrown around in the annals of American history. It's a label slapped onto folks, behaviors, or notions that go against what's deemed "American." But, let me tell you, dear reader, this concept is as flawed as a defective toaster. The idea of something being "Un-American" is pointless in the grand scheme of history. There is no such thing, really. Why? Because America is a tapestry of diverse cultures and ever-changing ways of being. Trying to confine a single set of values or beliefs as exclusively American is like fitting an elephant in a matchbox. It just isn't going to work.
So, let's not limit ourselves, shall we? Let's embrace the diversity that makes America, well, America. And let's leave the idea of "un-American" where it belongs - in the dustbin of history. As I sink my teeth into the idea of "un-American," a bitter taste lingers on my tongue. It's been used as a weapon of mass oppression, my friends. Back in the '50s, Senator Joseph McCarthy led a ruthless crusade to smoke out alleged commies and rebels hiding in plain sight within the government and beyond. His weapon of choice? An all-encompassing definition of "un-American," designed to cast a wide net that captured anyone remotely suspected of being a left-leaning sympathizer or associating with them. The results were catastrophic. Countless folks were scrutinized, ostracized, and even locked up without so much as a fair trial or a shred of evidence beyond rumors and political self-interest. It was a dark time in our nation's history when the idea of what it meant to be "American" was turned on its head.
In the grand scheme of things, the concept of being "un-American" has been employed as a tool for bias against those on the fringes of society. Take, for instance, the early 1900s, when southern and eastern European migrants were widely deemed "un-American" due to their distinct tongues, beliefs, and traditions. And let's not forget about the marginalization of African Americans and other non-white individuals who have been denied the opportunity to fully engage in American life based solely on their perceived lack of Americanness. The beauty of the American experiment lies in its lack of a rigid set of values and beliefs. It's a wild and unpredictable ride, full of twists and turns that keep us guessing. But that's what makes it all so damn exciting! The vast array of perspectives and experiences that contribute to the ongoing dialogue of what it truly means to be American is what keeps us pushing forward. This diversity is our ace in the hole, the secret weapon that has allowed us to weather any storm and emerge more robust and resilient than ever before. In the face of social, economic, and political upheaval, we adapt and evolve, like a chameleon changing colors in the blink of an eye. That's the American way, baby!
In the 1950s and 1960s, a mighty force arose in the land of America, challenging the notion that segregation and discrimination were woven into the nation's fabric. The civil rights movement, led by luminaries such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, drew upon the bedrock principles of democracy and equality enshrined in the Constitution to demand justice for African Americans. These valiant champions of freedom and equality rallied the masses to their cause, their impassioned speeches and bold actions striking fear into those who sought to maintain the status quo. Through their unwavering commitment to the cause, they succeeded in shifting the tide of public opinion, and their efforts culminated in the passage of historic civil rights legislation. Indeed, the civil rights movement stands as a testament to the indomitable spirit of the American people and their unyielding determination to uphold the values of justice and equality for all.
In the rich tapestry of American social movements, a particularly vibrant thread weaves through the struggle for LGBTQ rights. This dynamic movement boldly confronts the entrenched prejudices of our society and challenges the very foundations of gender and sexuality. Through tireless activism, LGBTQ individuals have galvanized a broader recognition of diversity and inclusivity, forever altering the fabric of American society. The LGBTQ movement is a testament to the power of individual voices and collective action to effect positive societal change. These brave voices, who have refused to be silenced or marginalized by the oppressive forces of conformity and intolerance, have propelled this movement forward. They have shone a light on the unjust labeling of "un-American," revealing the insidious nature of such discriminatory rhetoric.
Say, we must delve into the chronicles of the "un-American" notion to grasp how it's been wielded to further some causes and give the boot to certain factions throughout American annals. Acknowledging how the "un-American" concept's been used to legitimize prejudice and suppression, we can toil towards a more welcoming and just society that esteems variety and advances communal equity. As I wrap my head around this, I can't help but wonder: what the hell does "Un-American" even mean? Is it some catch-all phrase people use to justify their prejudices and biases? Let's be honest: America is a melting pot of cultures, beliefs, and ideas. It's a place where diversity thrives and innovation flourishes. Trying to boil all of that down into a single set of values or beliefs is not only limiting but also downright exclusionary.
But despite its flaws, the concept of "Un-American" has played a significant role in shaping our nation's history. It's been used to justify discrimination and repression, but it's also been challenged and subverted by social justice and equality movements. And that's the key. By understanding the complex and often messy history of "Un-American," we can work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society. A society that values diversity and recognizes that our differences are what make us strong. So let's move beyond this flawed concept and focus on building a future that embraces all that America offers. A future where everyone - regardless of their background or beliefs - can thrive and succeed.
THE RUNDOWN
- We shouldn't use the term "Un-American" because it's often used to insult or put down people who have different ideas or lifestyles. It could be more helpful in the big picture of history.
- America has many different cultures and ways of life that are constantly changing. It's impossible to say that only one set of values or beliefs is American.
- People have used the idea of being "Un-American" to discriminate against those different throughout history, like during the Red Scare and when people of color and non-white people were mistreated.
- The civil rights movement and LGBTQ rights show Americans' determination to treat everyone fairly and equally.
- Being American is complicated and has many different perspectives. People with different worldviews and ideas all contribute to the ongoing conversation about what it means to be American.
THE STATE OF THE UNION
HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Carnes, Mark C., and John A. Garraty. American Destiny: Narrative of a Nation. 4th ed. Vol. 1.: Pearson, 2011.
Mark C. Carnes and John A. Garraty are respected historians who have made notable contributions to American history. First, we've got Carnes - this guy's a real maverick when it comes to studying the good ol' US of A. He's all about the secret societies that helped shape our culture in the 1800s. You know, the ones that operated behind closed doors had their fingers in all sorts of pies. Carnes is the man who can unravel those mysteries and give us a glimpse into the underbelly of American culture. We've also got Garraty in the mix. This guy's no slouch either - he's known for taking a big-picture view of American history and bringing it to life with his engaging writing style. Whether profiling famous figures from our past or digging deep into a particular aspect of our nation's history, Garraty always keeps it accurate and accessible. You don't need a Ph.D. to understand what he's saying, and that's why he's a true heavyweight in the field.
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Carnes, Mark C., and John A. Garraty. American Destiny: Narrative of a Nation. 4th ed. Vol. 1.: Pearson, 2011.
Mark C. Carnes and John A. Garraty are respected historians who have made notable contributions to American history. First, we've got Carnes - this guy's a real maverick when it comes to studying the good ol' US of A. He's all about the secret societies that helped shape our culture in the 1800s. You know, the ones that operated behind closed doors had their fingers in all sorts of pies. Carnes is the man who can unravel those mysteries and give us a glimpse into the underbelly of American culture. We've also got Garraty in the mix. This guy's no slouch either - he's known for taking a big-picture view of American history and bringing it to life with his engaging writing style. Whether profiling famous figures from our past or digging deep into a particular aspect of our nation's history, Garraty always keeps it accurate and accessible. You don't need a Ph.D. to understand what he's saying, and that's why he's a true heavyweight in the field.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... It is possible, reading standard histories, to forget half the population of the country. The explorers were men, the landholders and merchants men, the political leaders men, the military figures men. The very invisibility of women, the overlooking of women, is a sign of
their submerged status.
In this invisibility they were something like black slaves (and thus slave women faced a double oppression). The biological uniqueness of women, like skin color and facial characteristics for Negroes, became a basis for treating them as inferiors. True, with women, there was something more practically important in their biology than skin color-their position as childbearers-but this was not enough to account for the general push backward
for all of them in society, even those who did not bear children, or those too young or too old for that. It seems that their physical characteristics became a convenience for men, who could use, exploit, and cherish someone who was at the same time servant, sex mate, companion, and bearer-teacher-ward en of his children.
Societies based on private property and competition, in which monogamous families became practical units for work and socialization, found it especially useful to establish this special status of women, something akin to a house slave in the matter of intimacy and oppression, and yet requiring, because of that intimacy, and long-term connection with children, a special patronization, which on occasion, especially in the face of a show of strength, could slip over into treatment as an equal. An oppression so private would turn out hard to uproot..."
"... It is possible, reading standard histories, to forget half the population of the country. The explorers were men, the landholders and merchants men, the political leaders men, the military figures men. The very invisibility of women, the overlooking of women, is a sign of
their submerged status.
In this invisibility they were something like black slaves (and thus slave women faced a double oppression). The biological uniqueness of women, like skin color and facial characteristics for Negroes, became a basis for treating them as inferiors. True, with women, there was something more practically important in their biology than skin color-their position as childbearers-but this was not enough to account for the general push backward
for all of them in society, even those who did not bear children, or those too young or too old for that. It seems that their physical characteristics became a convenience for men, who could use, exploit, and cherish someone who was at the same time servant, sex mate, companion, and bearer-teacher-ward en of his children.
Societies based on private property and competition, in which monogamous families became practical units for work and socialization, found it especially useful to establish this special status of women, something akin to a house slave in the matter of intimacy and oppression, and yet requiring, because of that intimacy, and long-term connection with children, a special patronization, which on occasion, especially in the face of a show of strength, could slip over into treatment as an equal. An oppression so private would turn out hard to uproot..."
Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
"... All of these causes combined to lead women, inevitably, toward feminism, a religio-socio-political philosophy born at the end of the Age of Jackson. Sarah and Angelina Grimké, Lucy Stone, Frances Wright, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and others led a small, fiery band of Jacksonian feminists. These women gathered together in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848, where they issued a proclamation—a Declaration of Sentiments—touching on nearly all of the issues (abortion is the notable exception) of today’s feminists. They decried the lack of education, economic opportunities (especially in medicine, law, and the pulpit), legal rights, marital power, and, most important, the “elective franchise” (the right to vote). 'The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man towards woman,' they declared, 'having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her...'"
"... All of these causes combined to lead women, inevitably, toward feminism, a religio-socio-political philosophy born at the end of the Age of Jackson. Sarah and Angelina Grimké, Lucy Stone, Frances Wright, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and others led a small, fiery band of Jacksonian feminists. These women gathered together in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848, where they issued a proclamation—a Declaration of Sentiments—touching on nearly all of the issues (abortion is the notable exception) of today’s feminists. They decried the lack of education, economic opportunities (especially in medicine, law, and the pulpit), legal rights, marital power, and, most important, the “elective franchise” (the right to vote). 'The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man towards woman,' they declared, 'having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her...'"
Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
"... In the nineteenth century, a woman who owned property, made high wages, had sex outside of marriage, performed or received oral sex, used birth control, consorted with men of other races, danced, drank, or walked alone in public, wore makeup, perfume, or stylish clothes—and was not ashamed—was probably a whore. In fact, prostitutes won virtually all the freedoms that were denied to women but are now taken for granted.
Prostitutes were especially successful in the wild, lawless, thoroughly renegade boomtowns of the West. When women were barred from most jobs and wives had no legal right to own property, madams in the West owned large tracts of land and prized real estate. Prostitutes made, by far, the highest wages of all American women. Several madams were so wealthy that they funded irrigation and road-building projects that laid the foundation for the New West. Decades before American employers offered health insurance to their workers, madams across the West provided their employees with free health care. While women were told that they could not and should not protect themselves from violence, and wives had no legal recourse against being raped by their husbands, police officers were employed by madams to protect the women who worked for them, and many madems owned and knew how to use guns..."
"... In the nineteenth century, a woman who owned property, made high wages, had sex outside of marriage, performed or received oral sex, used birth control, consorted with men of other races, danced, drank, or walked alone in public, wore makeup, perfume, or stylish clothes—and was not ashamed—was probably a whore. In fact, prostitutes won virtually all the freedoms that were denied to women but are now taken for granted.
Prostitutes were especially successful in the wild, lawless, thoroughly renegade boomtowns of the West. When women were barred from most jobs and wives had no legal right to own property, madams in the West owned large tracts of land and prized real estate. Prostitutes made, by far, the highest wages of all American women. Several madams were so wealthy that they funded irrigation and road-building projects that laid the foundation for the New West. Decades before American employers offered health insurance to their workers, madams across the West provided their employees with free health care. While women were told that they could not and should not protect themselves from violence, and wives had no legal recourse against being raped by their husbands, police officers were employed by madams to protect the women who worked for them, and many madems owned and knew how to use guns..."
In the chronicles of history, women have had a hell of a time grappling with the chains of systematic oppression and societal hurdles. It's a tale that echoes the struggles of enslaved Black people as we navigate the treacherous waters of subjugation. It's all about the game of societal structures. Private property and competition, those sneaky devils, have conspired to keep women in the shadows, where they've been banished for far too long. But fear not, for there were warriors among us! Early feminists stepped up to the plate, armed with their battle cries for education, economic opportunities, legal rights, and voting rights. Picture this: the Seneca Falls convention in 1848, where the winds of change swept through the room like a cyclone of revolution. It was a pivotal moment in the relentless fight for women's rights. Let us not forget the empowerment paradox of the ladies of the night in the wild and woolly American West. Yes, even prostitutes had their brand of power and influence in those untamed lands, adding a dash of complexity to the gender dynamics of yore.
Imagine a parallel universe where women and enslaved Black people were the shining beacons of privilege, basking in the glory of unfettered power and unconditional respect. Alas, we do not live in that universe. In our reality, these two groups have endured unimaginable levels of oppression, each stepping into subjugation. They were mere chattels; their humanity was reduced to a mere commodity. Basic human rights? Denied. Discrimination? Check. Violence? Oh, you bet. Exploitation? Like a twisted art form. It's a tragic tale where biases and unfair systems played the role of villains, casting their dark shadow over the societal landscape. But maybe in some distant dimension, they live as they should have, encouraged by the respect and reverence they always deserved.
Societal constructs are like these twisted webs that keep women in the margins, locked up, and tagged as property. In those patriarchal realms, women were nothing more than possessions; men were mere extensions of their fathers or husbands. Their bodies and labor were controlled, keeping them chained to limited opportunities in the economic and social game. And let's not forget about the grotesque institution of slavery. Black slaves, just pieces of property, were denied their humanity and rights, living under the brutal thumb of white owners. It's a sick dance, a twisted power play, all held together by these messed-up notions of ownership and competition.
Those fierce feminists from yesteryear saw the world for what it was—a twisted circus of injustice, especially for women. And boy, did they raise hell! In 1848, a pack of them gathered at the Seneca Falls convention, ready to shake things up. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott were at the forefront, armed with the Declaration of Sentiments, a booming demand for equality. They roared for women's rights in every damn sphere—education, work, and politics. That convention ignited the flames of suffrage. It was the spark that set the world ablaze, paving the way for years of progress in securing the rights women damn well deserve.
Education has stood as the key to unlocking the shackles of women's subjugation. In the 1800s, the society agreed that women were destined for the cozy comforts of the hearth, relegating them to a life of domesticity. Their chances of intellectual enlightenment were cruelly curtailed, along with any hope of professional advancement. But lo and behold, a band of brave feminists emerged, armed with the audacity to challenge this inequity. They saw education not as a mere endeavor but a catalyst for profound transformation. Thus, educational institutions tailored exclusively for women sprouted like daisies in spring, offering them a ticket to pursue careers and embrace that elusive state known as economic independence.
In the wild and tumultuous world of women's rights, the battle for legal rights and the almighty power to cast a vote played a vital role. Back in the day, women were shamelessly denied their rightful place within the realm of law, while their impact on public policy was cunningly brushed aside. But then, like a culinary crusader armed with a blazing spatula, the Seneca Falls convention emerged, fearlessly demanding women's sacred right to participate in the democratic dance. It was a rebellion simmering with fiery determination as they fought tooth and nail for their inclusion in the grand spectacle of governance. Granted, it took a good few decades for women to finally secure that long-awaited vote, but the seeds planted at that convention grew into a tantalizing recipe for future progress in this epic struggle for equality.
The American West, filled with contradictions and audacious possibilities, unraveled a distinct predicament for women, most notably for the enigmatic cohort of prostitutes. While conventional women grappled with the shackles of society's oppressive restrictions, the courtesans of the Wild West reveled in peculiar liberties and exclusive privileges. In this untamed landscape, the world's oldest profession offered a gateway to financial autonomy and vertical social ascension—an unforeseen avenue for the daring few. However, we must heed caution and acknowledge that such empowerment was but a smidgen of vitality, artfully contained within the labyrinthine confines of a patriarchal and exploitative framework. Thus, let us not hastily extrapolate their tales to the broader tapestry that defined the status quo for women in those untamed years.
Delving into the archives of women's historical subjugation becomes a crucible of enlightenment in our modern-day circus, a necessary tool to unravel the persistent tapestry of gender inequalities. As we embark on this wild expedition, we venture to unearth the eerie parallels between the plight of women and the shackles of enslaved Black people, weaving a tapestry of understanding around the insidious grip of social hierarchies and oppressive structures that perpetuate their marginalization. Those early feminists blazed trails of rebellion and defiance, revealing the transformative power of collective action and unyielding advocacy in forging a brighter future. And in the raucous depths of the American West, we encounter the bewildering complexities encompassing the empowerment of prostitutes, an unexpected revelation that shatters preconceived notions and illuminates the dire need for a nuanced comprehension of historical contexts in our ceaseless pursuit of gender equality.
In the grim tapestry of human existence, women's subjugation throughout history is a testament to the depths of bias and inequality, much like the chains that bound enslaved Black people. These historical injustices are interwoven with the very fabric of society, where concepts like private property and cutthroat competition fuel the marginalization of women. But let us not forget the pioneers, those early feminists who dared to challenge the status quo. The audacious gathering at Seneca Falls was a rallying cry that sparked waves of change, rippling through education, economics, law, and even the sacred realm of suffrage. And let's not overlook the paradoxical tale of the prostitutes of the American West, who, against all odds, found a twisted sort of empowerment within their unconventional profession. To understand the intricate dance of gender dynamics, we must delve into these tales of struggle and triumph, for it is through this knowledge that we forge ahead closer to a world where equity and inclusivity reign supreme.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
Work Cited:
DuBois, Ellen Carol. "Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 1848-1869." Cornell University Press, 1978.
Flexner, Eleanor. "A Century of Struggle: The Women's Rights Movement in the United States." Harvard University Press, 1996.
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. "Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America." Oxford University Press, 1986.
Stansell, Christine. "City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789-1860." University of Illinois Press, 1986.
Imagine a parallel universe where women and enslaved Black people were the shining beacons of privilege, basking in the glory of unfettered power and unconditional respect. Alas, we do not live in that universe. In our reality, these two groups have endured unimaginable levels of oppression, each stepping into subjugation. They were mere chattels; their humanity was reduced to a mere commodity. Basic human rights? Denied. Discrimination? Check. Violence? Oh, you bet. Exploitation? Like a twisted art form. It's a tragic tale where biases and unfair systems played the role of villains, casting their dark shadow over the societal landscape. But maybe in some distant dimension, they live as they should have, encouraged by the respect and reverence they always deserved.
Societal constructs are like these twisted webs that keep women in the margins, locked up, and tagged as property. In those patriarchal realms, women were nothing more than possessions; men were mere extensions of their fathers or husbands. Their bodies and labor were controlled, keeping them chained to limited opportunities in the economic and social game. And let's not forget about the grotesque institution of slavery. Black slaves, just pieces of property, were denied their humanity and rights, living under the brutal thumb of white owners. It's a sick dance, a twisted power play, all held together by these messed-up notions of ownership and competition.
Those fierce feminists from yesteryear saw the world for what it was—a twisted circus of injustice, especially for women. And boy, did they raise hell! In 1848, a pack of them gathered at the Seneca Falls convention, ready to shake things up. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott were at the forefront, armed with the Declaration of Sentiments, a booming demand for equality. They roared for women's rights in every damn sphere—education, work, and politics. That convention ignited the flames of suffrage. It was the spark that set the world ablaze, paving the way for years of progress in securing the rights women damn well deserve.
Education has stood as the key to unlocking the shackles of women's subjugation. In the 1800s, the society agreed that women were destined for the cozy comforts of the hearth, relegating them to a life of domesticity. Their chances of intellectual enlightenment were cruelly curtailed, along with any hope of professional advancement. But lo and behold, a band of brave feminists emerged, armed with the audacity to challenge this inequity. They saw education not as a mere endeavor but a catalyst for profound transformation. Thus, educational institutions tailored exclusively for women sprouted like daisies in spring, offering them a ticket to pursue careers and embrace that elusive state known as economic independence.
In the wild and tumultuous world of women's rights, the battle for legal rights and the almighty power to cast a vote played a vital role. Back in the day, women were shamelessly denied their rightful place within the realm of law, while their impact on public policy was cunningly brushed aside. But then, like a culinary crusader armed with a blazing spatula, the Seneca Falls convention emerged, fearlessly demanding women's sacred right to participate in the democratic dance. It was a rebellion simmering with fiery determination as they fought tooth and nail for their inclusion in the grand spectacle of governance. Granted, it took a good few decades for women to finally secure that long-awaited vote, but the seeds planted at that convention grew into a tantalizing recipe for future progress in this epic struggle for equality.
The American West, filled with contradictions and audacious possibilities, unraveled a distinct predicament for women, most notably for the enigmatic cohort of prostitutes. While conventional women grappled with the shackles of society's oppressive restrictions, the courtesans of the Wild West reveled in peculiar liberties and exclusive privileges. In this untamed landscape, the world's oldest profession offered a gateway to financial autonomy and vertical social ascension—an unforeseen avenue for the daring few. However, we must heed caution and acknowledge that such empowerment was but a smidgen of vitality, artfully contained within the labyrinthine confines of a patriarchal and exploitative framework. Thus, let us not hastily extrapolate their tales to the broader tapestry that defined the status quo for women in those untamed years.
Delving into the archives of women's historical subjugation becomes a crucible of enlightenment in our modern-day circus, a necessary tool to unravel the persistent tapestry of gender inequalities. As we embark on this wild expedition, we venture to unearth the eerie parallels between the plight of women and the shackles of enslaved Black people, weaving a tapestry of understanding around the insidious grip of social hierarchies and oppressive structures that perpetuate their marginalization. Those early feminists blazed trails of rebellion and defiance, revealing the transformative power of collective action and unyielding advocacy in forging a brighter future. And in the raucous depths of the American West, we encounter the bewildering complexities encompassing the empowerment of prostitutes, an unexpected revelation that shatters preconceived notions and illuminates the dire need for a nuanced comprehension of historical contexts in our ceaseless pursuit of gender equality.
In the grim tapestry of human existence, women's subjugation throughout history is a testament to the depths of bias and inequality, much like the chains that bound enslaved Black people. These historical injustices are interwoven with the very fabric of society, where concepts like private property and cutthroat competition fuel the marginalization of women. But let us not forget the pioneers, those early feminists who dared to challenge the status quo. The audacious gathering at Seneca Falls was a rallying cry that sparked waves of change, rippling through education, economics, law, and even the sacred realm of suffrage. And let's not overlook the paradoxical tale of the prostitutes of the American West, who, against all odds, found a twisted sort of empowerment within their unconventional profession. To understand the intricate dance of gender dynamics, we must delve into these tales of struggle and triumph, for it is through this knowledge that we forge ahead closer to a world where equity and inclusivity reign supreme.
THE RUNDOWN
- Throughout history, women and enslaved Black people have faced systematic oppression and societal hurdles.
- Women and enslaved Black people were treated as property and denied fundamental human rights.
- Early feminists fought for education, economic opportunities, legal rights, and voting rights, with the Seneca Falls convention in 1848 being pivotal.
- Societal constructs and limited opportunities in the economic and social spheres perpetuated women's subjugation.
- Education played a crucial role in empowering women and challenging gender inequality.
- The battle for legal rights and the right to vote was essential in the fight for women's equality.
- In the American West, prostitutes found a degree of empowerment within their profession, but it was limited within a patriarchal and exploitative framework.
- Understanding the history of women's subjugation and the struggles of early feminists is essential for achieving gender equality.
- The parallels between the struggles of women and enslaved Black people highlight the need to address societal bias and inequality.
- The stories of struggle and triumph inspire us to work towards a world of equity and inclusivity.
QUESTIONS
- Explore the complexities surrounding the empowerment of prostitutes in the American West. What were the limitations and challenges they faced? How did their profession give them certain liberties and social mobility within a patriarchal society?
- Reflecting on the historical experiences of women and enslaved Black people, what parallels can be drawn between their struggles for liberation and the societal structures that perpetuated their oppression?
- How do biases and unfair systems, such as the concept of ownership and competition, contribute to the marginalization of women? What examples of these societal constructs have hindered women's progress?
Work Cited:
DuBois, Ellen Carol. "Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 1848-1869." Cornell University Press, 1978.
Flexner, Eleanor. "A Century of Struggle: The Women's Rights Movement in the United States." Harvard University Press, 1996.
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. "Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America." Oxford University Press, 1986.
Stansell, Christine. "City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789-1860." University of Illinois Press, 1986.
Grand Canyon Sightseer Na Woman Standing Next To A Horse As She Looks Out Across The Grand Canyon In Arizona Through A Pair Of Binoculars Stereograph 1903
WATCH
KEY TERMS
ASSIGNMENTS
Forum Discussion #11
- John Fremont
- Cult of Domesticity
- Seneca Falls Convention
- The Compromise of 1850
- The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
- Fredrick Douglass
- Moby Dick
- Anti-Mexican Violence
- Ranchos
- Chinese Americans
- California Genocide
- Uncle Tom's Cabin
- Transcendentalism
- Sojourner Truth
- Commodore Perry
ASSIGNMENTS
- Forum Discussion #11
- MIDTERM
Forum Discussion #11
The Oregon Trail is a 2,170-mile historic East–West, large-wheeled wagon route and emigrant trail in the United States that connected the Missouri River to valleys in Oregon. The eastern part of the Oregon Trail spanned part of the future state of Kansas, and nearly all of what are now the states of Nebraska and Wyoming. The western half of the trail spanned most of the future states of Idaho and Oregon. The Oregon Trail is also a text-based strategy video game. It was developed as a computer game to teach schoolchildren about the realities of 19th-century pioneer life on the Oregon Trail. In the game, the player assumes the role of a wagon leader guiding a party of settlers from Independence, Missouri, to Oregon City, Oregon via a covered wagon in 1847. Along the way, the player must purchase supplies, hunt for food, and make choices on how to proceed along the trail while encountering random events such as storms and wagon breakdowns.
Do some research and please answer the following question with a two-paragraph minimum:
Play a round of Oregon Trail (browser version can be found HERE) When finished, compare and contrast the game and the actual Oregon Trail for historical accuracies.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
Do some research and please answer the following question with a two-paragraph minimum:
Play a round of Oregon Trail (browser version can be found HERE) When finished, compare and contrast the game and the actual Oregon Trail for historical accuracies.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
Ready to take the Midterm? Click the link above to get the study guide.
LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO
LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.