HST 150 Module #2
I'll Have What She's Having (2686 BCE - 1500 CE)
Welcome to HST 150! This is the first learning module examining sex in world history. Sex is integral to the human experience and has significantly shaped history. Understanding the history of sex can help us understand how different societies have viewed and regulated sexuality and how these views have changed over time. This can provide insight into the social, cultural, and political contexts in which people have lived and how these contexts have shaped their experiences and identities. Studying the history of sex can also help us understand how different societies have constructed gender roles and expectations and how these have changed over time. This can provide insight into how gender has been used as a means of social control and how it has been used to justify discrimination and oppression.
Studying the history of sex can also help us understand how different societies have dealt with issues related to reproductive health and rights and how these have changed over time. This can provide insight into how institutions have attempted to regulate and control reproductive health and rights and how this has impacted individuals and communities. Studying the history of sex can help us better understand the complexities of human experience and how social, cultural, and political factors have shaped how we know and experience sexuality.
Welcome to HST 150! This is the first learning module examining sex in world history. Sex is integral to the human experience and has significantly shaped history. Understanding the history of sex can help us understand how different societies have viewed and regulated sexuality and how these views have changed over time. This can provide insight into the social, cultural, and political contexts in which people have lived and how these contexts have shaped their experiences and identities. Studying the history of sex can also help us understand how different societies have constructed gender roles and expectations and how these have changed over time. This can provide insight into how gender has been used as a means of social control and how it has been used to justify discrimination and oppression.
Studying the history of sex can also help us understand how different societies have dealt with issues related to reproductive health and rights and how these have changed over time. This can provide insight into how institutions have attempted to regulate and control reproductive health and rights and how this has impacted individuals and communities. Studying the history of sex can help us better understand the complexities of human experience and how social, cultural, and political factors have shaped how we know and experience sexuality.
#2 History is Constantly Changing
There is a common myth that lingers within the historical community. Every year I ask my students whether they enjoy history or not. Generally, I get a good mix of enjoyment juxtaposed with physical anguish. If I press further and see WHY they hate studying history, the overwhelming answer is that history never changes. It’s boring. I am here to put that baby to bed with rule number two of history: History is constantly changing. If we were to receive all our information from a textbook written 30 years ago, then yes, history doesn’t change. But as we discover more artifacts buried in the mountains or invite more perspectives to the table (much like the 1619 Project), the account becomes more elastic.
History is always changing because new information and perspectives are constantly being discovered and added to our understanding of the past. Our knowledge of history can change as we learn more about the past through discovering new sources and reinterpreting existing ones. Several factors contribute to the changing nature of history. One is the availability of new sources. As historians uncover new primary sources, such as documents, artifacts, and other materials, they can add further information and perspectives to our understanding of the past. This can sometimes lead to a reinterpretation of previously accepted historical narratives. For example, recent research has revealed that the ancient Maya civilization was much more sophisticated and technologically advanced than previously thought.
Another factor contributing to the changing nature of history is the shifting nature of historical interpretation. As historians bring new perspectives and theoretical frameworks to the study of the past, they may reinterpret existing sources in new ways, leading to new understandings of historical events and trends. For example, recent evidence has revealed the extent of Soviet involvement in WWII and the role that Stalin played in shaping the outcome of the conflict. Finally, the changing nature of history can also be influenced by societal values and priorities shifts. As society changes, so do the questions that historians ask about the past and how they interpret and understand it. For example, recent research has revealed the significant role that African Americans and women played in the American Revolution, challenging the traditional narrative of the revolution as a primarily white, male-led event.
History: A subject as ever-changing as the weather. It twists and turns like a river as we uncover new information and view past events through different lenses. Today, the study of history is more important than ever. By understanding the past, we can glean important lessons and avoid repeating the same mistakes. In the ever-changing tapestry of time, the past is forever in flux. The lens of our present colors our understanding of what went down before we got here. It's like we're all wearing shades, which can shift with the tides of society and values. Take colonialism, for example. Back in the day, it was hailed as a glorious enterprise, a civilizing mission that brought enlightenment to the benighted heathens. But we now view it through a darker lens, as a force that trampled upon and exploited the people it claimed to uplift. It just shows what we think we know is always subject to change.
Do you know what's fascinating? History can constantly evolve and change based on new information and available sources. Take the Dead Sea Scrolls, for example. In the mid-20th century, these ancient manuscripts were discovered, and suddenly everything we thought we knew about Christianity and Judaism's origins was questioned. It turned out that these religions were way more diverse and complex than we ever could have imagined. It shows that the more we learn, the more we realize how little we know. It's all subjective. Biases and prejudices can creep in and warp the way we see things. Take historical figures, for instance. One person might see Winston Churchill as a hero, a champion who saved Britain from certain doom in the Second World War. But someone else, well, they might see him as a racist imperialist who imposed his will on India and caused untold suffering. It's all a matter of perspective, man. The truth exists, but we must sift through the propaganda and find it.
If you want to know where you came from and what kind of mess we're in now, you must study history. It isn't just about memorizing dates and names; it's about learning from our mistakes so we don't have to keep repeating them. Take the Holocaust, for instance. That's some heavy shit, but it taught us a thing or two about the dangers of being intolerant and extreme. Now we have a better handle on human rights and equality, which is worth fighting for.
It is essential to recognize that history serves as a vital tool for comprehending the intricate workings of our world and how various societies and cultures have intersected throughout history. By examining the Silk Road trade routes, we can gain a deeper insight into the historical ties between Asia, Europe, and Africa and how these ties impacted the evolution of distinct societies. History is a shape-shifting beast, ever-morphing with each discovery, shift in perspective, and subjective interpretation. But fear not, for studying history is as crucial now as ever. Through the lens of the past, we can gain valuable insights that help us navigate the present and avoid repeating the same old mistakes. By peering into the annals of history, we can also gain a greater appreciation for our place in this world and a deeper understanding of the intricate workings of human society.
Overall, the changing nature of history is a testament to the ongoing process of historical inquiry and the human desire to understand the past better.
THE RUNDOWN
Work Cited:
Evans, Richard J. In Defense of History. WW Norton & Company, 2000.
Hobsbawm, Eric. On History. New Press, 1997.
Pomeranz, Kenneth. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton University Press, 2000.
Tuchman, Barbara. The Guns of August. Random House, 1962.
There is a common myth that lingers within the historical community. Every year I ask my students whether they enjoy history or not. Generally, I get a good mix of enjoyment juxtaposed with physical anguish. If I press further and see WHY they hate studying history, the overwhelming answer is that history never changes. It’s boring. I am here to put that baby to bed with rule number two of history: History is constantly changing. If we were to receive all our information from a textbook written 30 years ago, then yes, history doesn’t change. But as we discover more artifacts buried in the mountains or invite more perspectives to the table (much like the 1619 Project), the account becomes more elastic.
History is always changing because new information and perspectives are constantly being discovered and added to our understanding of the past. Our knowledge of history can change as we learn more about the past through discovering new sources and reinterpreting existing ones. Several factors contribute to the changing nature of history. One is the availability of new sources. As historians uncover new primary sources, such as documents, artifacts, and other materials, they can add further information and perspectives to our understanding of the past. This can sometimes lead to a reinterpretation of previously accepted historical narratives. For example, recent research has revealed that the ancient Maya civilization was much more sophisticated and technologically advanced than previously thought.
Another factor contributing to the changing nature of history is the shifting nature of historical interpretation. As historians bring new perspectives and theoretical frameworks to the study of the past, they may reinterpret existing sources in new ways, leading to new understandings of historical events and trends. For example, recent evidence has revealed the extent of Soviet involvement in WWII and the role that Stalin played in shaping the outcome of the conflict. Finally, the changing nature of history can also be influenced by societal values and priorities shifts. As society changes, so do the questions that historians ask about the past and how they interpret and understand it. For example, recent research has revealed the significant role that African Americans and women played in the American Revolution, challenging the traditional narrative of the revolution as a primarily white, male-led event.
History: A subject as ever-changing as the weather. It twists and turns like a river as we uncover new information and view past events through different lenses. Today, the study of history is more important than ever. By understanding the past, we can glean important lessons and avoid repeating the same mistakes. In the ever-changing tapestry of time, the past is forever in flux. The lens of our present colors our understanding of what went down before we got here. It's like we're all wearing shades, which can shift with the tides of society and values. Take colonialism, for example. Back in the day, it was hailed as a glorious enterprise, a civilizing mission that brought enlightenment to the benighted heathens. But we now view it through a darker lens, as a force that trampled upon and exploited the people it claimed to uplift. It just shows what we think we know is always subject to change.
Do you know what's fascinating? History can constantly evolve and change based on new information and available sources. Take the Dead Sea Scrolls, for example. In the mid-20th century, these ancient manuscripts were discovered, and suddenly everything we thought we knew about Christianity and Judaism's origins was questioned. It turned out that these religions were way more diverse and complex than we ever could have imagined. It shows that the more we learn, the more we realize how little we know. It's all subjective. Biases and prejudices can creep in and warp the way we see things. Take historical figures, for instance. One person might see Winston Churchill as a hero, a champion who saved Britain from certain doom in the Second World War. But someone else, well, they might see him as a racist imperialist who imposed his will on India and caused untold suffering. It's all a matter of perspective, man. The truth exists, but we must sift through the propaganda and find it.
If you want to know where you came from and what kind of mess we're in now, you must study history. It isn't just about memorizing dates and names; it's about learning from our mistakes so we don't have to keep repeating them. Take the Holocaust, for instance. That's some heavy shit, but it taught us a thing or two about the dangers of being intolerant and extreme. Now we have a better handle on human rights and equality, which is worth fighting for.
It is essential to recognize that history serves as a vital tool for comprehending the intricate workings of our world and how various societies and cultures have intersected throughout history. By examining the Silk Road trade routes, we can gain a deeper insight into the historical ties between Asia, Europe, and Africa and how these ties impacted the evolution of distinct societies. History is a shape-shifting beast, ever-morphing with each discovery, shift in perspective, and subjective interpretation. But fear not, for studying history is as crucial now as ever. Through the lens of the past, we can gain valuable insights that help us navigate the present and avoid repeating the same old mistakes. By peering into the annals of history, we can also gain a greater appreciation for our place in this world and a deeper understanding of the intricate workings of human society.
Overall, the changing nature of history is a testament to the ongoing process of historical inquiry and the human desire to understand the past better.
THE RUNDOWN
- History is always changing because new information and perspectives are constantly being discovered and added to our understanding of the past.
- New primary sources, such as documents, artifacts, and other materials, can add further information and perspectives to our understanding of the past, sometimes leading to a reinterpretation of previously accepted historical narratives.
- Historical interpretation can also shift as historians bring new perspectives and theoretical frameworks to studying the past, leading to new understandings of historical events and trends.
- Societal values and priorities shifts can also influence the changing nature of history, as the questions historians ask about the past change over time.
- By understanding the past, we can learn important lessons and avoid repeating the same mistakes in the future.
- History is a shape-shifting beast that changes with each discovery, shift in perspective, and subjective interpretation.
- Through the lens of the past, we can gain valuable insights that help us navigate the present and understand the intricate workings of human society.
- Studying history is as crucial now as ever, as it can help us avoid repeating the same old mistakes and gain a greater appreciation for our place in this world.
Work Cited:
Evans, Richard J. In Defense of History. WW Norton & Company, 2000.
Hobsbawm, Eric. On History. New Press, 1997.
Pomeranz, Kenneth. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton University Press, 2000.
Tuchman, Barbara. The Guns of August. Random House, 1962.
STATE OF THE WORLD
HIGHLIGHTS
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
- COMING SOON
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Bentley, Jerry. Traditions & Encounter Volume 1 from Beginning to 1500, 7th ed.: McGraw Hill, 2021 .
Jerry H. Bentley was a historian and academic who specialized in world history, with a focus on cultural and economic exchange, comparative history, and the study of empires. He was a professor at the University of Hawaii and served as the President of the American Historical Association. Bentley wrote several books on world history and globalization, including "Old World Encounters" and he made significant contributions to the field. He passed away in 2014.
- Bentley, Chapter 3: The Emergence of Complex Societies in Africa and the Bantu Migrations
- Bentley, Chapter 4: The Emergence of Complex Societies in South Asia
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Bentley, Jerry. Traditions & Encounter Volume 1 from Beginning to 1500, 7th ed.: McGraw Hill, 2021 .
Jerry H. Bentley was a historian and academic who specialized in world history, with a focus on cultural and economic exchange, comparative history, and the study of empires. He was a professor at the University of Hawaii and served as the President of the American Historical Association. Bentley wrote several books on world history and globalization, including "Old World Encounters" and he made significant contributions to the field. He passed away in 2014.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.

Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... (Native American) Marriage laws are non-existent men and women alike choose their mates and leave them as they please, without offense, jealousy or anger. They multiply in great abundance; pregnant women work to the last minute and give birth almost painlessly; up the next day, they bathe in the river and are as clean and healthy as before giving birth. If they tire of their men, they give themselves abortions with herbs that force stillbirths, covering their shameful parts with leaves or cotton cloth; although on the whole, Indian men and women look upon total nakedness with as much casualness as we look upon a man's head or at his hands..."
"...The master tried to control completely the sexual lives of the servants. It was in his economic interest to keep women servants from marrying or from having sexual relations, because childbearing would interfere with work. Benjamin Franklin, writing as "Poor Richard" in 1736, gave advice to his readers: "Let thy maidservant be faithful, strong and homely..."
"... (Native American) Marriage laws are non-existent men and women alike choose their mates and leave them as they please, without offense, jealousy or anger. They multiply in great abundance; pregnant women work to the last minute and give birth almost painlessly; up the next day, they bathe in the river and are as clean and healthy as before giving birth. If they tire of their men, they give themselves abortions with herbs that force stillbirths, covering their shameful parts with leaves or cotton cloth; although on the whole, Indian men and women look upon total nakedness with as much casualness as we look upon a man's head or at his hands..."
"...The master tried to control completely the sexual lives of the servants. It was in his economic interest to keep women servants from marrying or from having sexual relations, because childbearing would interfere with work. Benjamin Franklin, writing as "Poor Richard" in 1736, gave advice to his readers: "Let thy maidservant be faithful, strong and homely..."

Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
"..Black codes (In the United States) forbade slave literacy, gun or dog ownership, travel (excepting special travel permits), gatherings numbering more than six slaves, and sex between black males and white women (miscegenation). However, as the development of a large mulatto population attests, white men were obviously free to have sex with—or, more often, rape—black women.
"...Even the most “benign” slavery, however, was always immoral and oppressive. Every female slave knew that ultimately if her master chose to make sexual advances, she had no authority to refuse. The system legitimized rape, even though benign masters never touched their female slaves..."
"...Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, which appeared in 1953, even if tainted by flawed data still indicated that women were having sex before marriage in large numbers, perhaps—if Kinsey’s statistics were to be believed— up to half of the six thousand women he had interviewed. Certainly men thought about sex all the time, or at least that was the premise behind the launch of Hugh Hefner’s Playboy magazine in 1953, wherein photos of nude women were legitimized for viewing by middle-class men by packaging them with interviews, fiction, and “serious reporting...”
"...The free love movement, supported by the hippies, also reinforced the attack on constraints. Two strains of free love arguments appeared. One held that any breaking of sexual taboos and any attack on censorship represented an advance against the male-dominated power structure. Thus, some supported the women’s movement not because it allowed women to seek self-fulfillment outside the home, but because it undercut capitalism and traditionalism. A second, more radical, wave of sexual politics involved the quest for polymorphous perversity—a call to try everything, do everything, and ignore all restraints against homosexuality, pedophilia, and bestiality—and the
destruction of all distinctions between men and women. Any type of affection that affirmed life, these advocates argued, was desirable. Marriage and heterosexuality inhibited such life affirmation and therefore were wrong...."
"..Black codes (In the United States) forbade slave literacy, gun or dog ownership, travel (excepting special travel permits), gatherings numbering more than six slaves, and sex between black males and white women (miscegenation). However, as the development of a large mulatto population attests, white men were obviously free to have sex with—or, more often, rape—black women.
"...Even the most “benign” slavery, however, was always immoral and oppressive. Every female slave knew that ultimately if her master chose to make sexual advances, she had no authority to refuse. The system legitimized rape, even though benign masters never touched their female slaves..."
"...Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, which appeared in 1953, even if tainted by flawed data still indicated that women were having sex before marriage in large numbers, perhaps—if Kinsey’s statistics were to be believed— up to half of the six thousand women he had interviewed. Certainly men thought about sex all the time, or at least that was the premise behind the launch of Hugh Hefner’s Playboy magazine in 1953, wherein photos of nude women were legitimized for viewing by middle-class men by packaging them with interviews, fiction, and “serious reporting...”
"...The free love movement, supported by the hippies, also reinforced the attack on constraints. Two strains of free love arguments appeared. One held that any breaking of sexual taboos and any attack on censorship represented an advance against the male-dominated power structure. Thus, some supported the women’s movement not because it allowed women to seek self-fulfillment outside the home, but because it undercut capitalism and traditionalism. A second, more radical, wave of sexual politics involved the quest for polymorphous perversity—a call to try everything, do everything, and ignore all restraints against homosexuality, pedophilia, and bestiality—and the
destruction of all distinctions between men and women. Any type of affection that affirmed life, these advocates argued, was desirable. Marriage and heterosexuality inhibited such life affirmation and therefore were wrong...."

Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
"... In the nineteenth century, a woman who owned property, made high wages, had sex outside of marriage, performed or received oral sex, used birth control, consorted with men of other races, danced, drank, or walked alone in public, wore makeup, perfume or stylish clothes–and was not ashamed–was probably a whore. In fact, prostitutes won virtually all the freedoms that were denied to women but are now taken for granted...”
"... In the nineteenth century, a woman who owned property, made high wages, had sex outside of marriage, performed or received oral sex, used birth control, consorted with men of other races, danced, drank, or walked alone in public, wore makeup, perfume or stylish clothes–and was not ashamed–was probably a whore. In fact, prostitutes won virtually all the freedoms that were denied to women but are now taken for granted...”
What Does Professor Lancaster Think?
During the nineteenth century, women who exhibited certain behaviors or characteristics, such as owning property, making high wages, engaging in premarital sex, using birth control, interacting with men of other races, engaging in leisure activities, consuming alcohol, and dressing or grooming themselves in specific ways, were often perceived as prostitutes. Prostitutes gained many freedoms and liberties that were not generally available to other women at the time. These freedoms are now considered standard for women in many societies. In Native American cultures, marriage laws were less strict, and people had more freedom to choose their partners and end relationships as they pleased. This lack of strict rules around relationships and sex resulted in a higher rate of childbirth and fewer issues with jealousy or anger. Native women also had access to herbs that they could use to induce abortions if they no longer wanted to carry a pregnancy to term.
On the other hand, European colonizers often tried to control the sexual lives of their servants, including women, to prevent them from having children that would interfere with their work. Benjamin Franklin, a prominent figure in early American history, even advised his readers to choose homely and faithful maidservants less likely to attract sexual attention. During slavery in the United States, officials put Black Codes in place to restrict the freedoms of enslaved people. These laws forbade enslaved people from learning to read or write, owning guns or dogs, traveling without permission, gathering in groups of more than six, and engaging in sexual relationships with white people. However, these laws did not prevent white people, particularly white men, from sexually assaulting and raping enslaved black women. Even in cases where enslaved people had "benign" masters who did not physically abuse them, they were still vulnerable to sexual exploitation because they had no legal recourse to refuse unwanted advances.
In the mid-twentieth century, the publication of Alfred Kinsey's "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female" suggested that a significant number of women were engaging in premarital sex, and the launch of Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" magazine further fueled societal interest in sexual behavior. The free love movement emerged during this time, advocating for more openness and freedom in sexual relationships and challenging traditional gender roles and sexual norms. Some proponents of free love argued that breaking sexual taboos and challenging censorship were ways to resist the male-dominated power structure. In contrast, others argued for the acceptance of a wide range of sexual behaviors and the destruction of distinctions between men and women.
During the nineteenth century, women who exhibited certain behaviors or characteristics, such as owning property, making high wages, engaging in premarital sex, using birth control, interacting with men of other races, engaging in leisure activities, consuming alcohol, and dressing or grooming themselves in specific ways, were often perceived as prostitutes. Prostitutes gained many freedoms and liberties that were not generally available to other women at the time. These freedoms are now considered standard for women in many societies. In Native American cultures, marriage laws were less strict, and people had more freedom to choose their partners and end relationships as they pleased. This lack of strict rules around relationships and sex resulted in a higher rate of childbirth and fewer issues with jealousy or anger. Native women also had access to herbs that they could use to induce abortions if they no longer wanted to carry a pregnancy to term.
On the other hand, European colonizers often tried to control the sexual lives of their servants, including women, to prevent them from having children that would interfere with their work. Benjamin Franklin, a prominent figure in early American history, even advised his readers to choose homely and faithful maidservants less likely to attract sexual attention. During slavery in the United States, officials put Black Codes in place to restrict the freedoms of enslaved people. These laws forbade enslaved people from learning to read or write, owning guns or dogs, traveling without permission, gathering in groups of more than six, and engaging in sexual relationships with white people. However, these laws did not prevent white people, particularly white men, from sexually assaulting and raping enslaved black women. Even in cases where enslaved people had "benign" masters who did not physically abuse them, they were still vulnerable to sexual exploitation because they had no legal recourse to refuse unwanted advances.
In the mid-twentieth century, the publication of Alfred Kinsey's "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female" suggested that a significant number of women were engaging in premarital sex, and the launch of Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" magazine further fueled societal interest in sexual behavior. The free love movement emerged during this time, advocating for more openness and freedom in sexual relationships and challenging traditional gender roles and sexual norms. Some proponents of free love argued that breaking sexual taboos and challenging censorship were ways to resist the male-dominated power structure. In contrast, others argued for the acceptance of a wide range of sexual behaviors and the destruction of distinctions between men and women.
KEY TERMS
ASSIGNMENTS
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
- Horus and Isis
- Egyptians
- Greeks
- Plato's importance of physical pleasure
- Birth Control (Ancient)
- Aphrodite
- Romans
- Chinese
- Indians
- Kama Sutra
- Tantric sex
- The Catholic Church
- Arranged marriages
- Courtly Love
- birth control (Middle Ages)
- Romantic Love
- Troubadour Tradition
- STDs
- Harem
- Cult of Mary Magdalene
ASSIGNMENTS
- Forum Discussion #3
Remember all assignments, tests and quizzes must be submitted official via BLACKBOARD
Forum Discussion #3
See U in History is a YouTube channel that discusses history or mythology. This particular entry looks have the sexual practices during the middle ages. Watch this video and answer the following question:
See U in History is a YouTube channel that discusses history or mythology. This particular entry looks have the sexual practices during the middle ages. Watch this video and answer the following question:
How did the Catholic Church's teachings on sex and sexuality shape attitudes towards sexual behavior in the Middle Ages?
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.