HST 201 Module #6
Module Six: Be Careful About What We Pretend To Be (1786 CE- 1803 CE)
The period between 1786 CE and 1803 CE was a crucial time in American history. During this time, the United States experienced significant political, economic, and social changes that continue to influence the nation today. It is crucial to study this period to understand how the United States became the country it is today, as well as to learn from the positive and negative aspects of this period to inform our actions moving forward.
One of the most significant events during this period was the drafting and adoption of the United States Constitution. In 1787, delegates from across the country gathered in Philadelphia to create a new constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation, which had proved ineffective in governing the country. The Constitution established the framework for the federal government and laid out the rights and responsibilities of its citizens. The Constitution was ratified in 1788 and has been the foundation of American democracy ever since.
However, the adoption of the Constitution was not without its controversies. Many people, including the Anti-Federalists, were concerned that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states and individuals. This led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which protected individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press.
Another significant event during this period was the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. President Thomas Jefferson negotiated the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France, which nearly doubled the size of the United States. This acquisition provided new opportunities for settlement and expansion and was essential in shaping the nation's geography and economy.
However, the Louisiana Purchase also had negative consequences, particularly for the Native American tribes that were already living in the territory. The expansion of American settlers into the Louisiana Territory led to conflicts and forced removals of these tribes, contributing to the displacement and loss of Native American culture and sovereignty.
In conclusion, the period between 1786 CE and 1803 CE was a crucial time in American history that had significant positive and negative consequences. The adoption of the United States Constitution and the Louisiana Purchase were pivotal events that shaped the nation's political and economic trajectory. However, it is essential to acknowledge and learn from the negative impacts of these events, such as the displacement and oppression of Native American tribes. By studying this period, we can better understand the complexities of American history and inform our actions moving forward.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
The period between 1786 CE and 1803 CE was a crucial time in American history. During this time, the United States experienced significant political, economic, and social changes that continue to influence the nation today. It is crucial to study this period to understand how the United States became the country it is today, as well as to learn from the positive and negative aspects of this period to inform our actions moving forward.
One of the most significant events during this period was the drafting and adoption of the United States Constitution. In 1787, delegates from across the country gathered in Philadelphia to create a new constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation, which had proved ineffective in governing the country. The Constitution established the framework for the federal government and laid out the rights and responsibilities of its citizens. The Constitution was ratified in 1788 and has been the foundation of American democracy ever since.
However, the adoption of the Constitution was not without its controversies. Many people, including the Anti-Federalists, were concerned that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states and individuals. This led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which protected individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press.
Another significant event during this period was the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. President Thomas Jefferson negotiated the purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France, which nearly doubled the size of the United States. This acquisition provided new opportunities for settlement and expansion and was essential in shaping the nation's geography and economy.
However, the Louisiana Purchase also had negative consequences, particularly for the Native American tribes that were already living in the territory. The expansion of American settlers into the Louisiana Territory led to conflicts and forced removals of these tribes, contributing to the displacement and loss of Native American culture and sovereignty.
In conclusion, the period between 1786 CE and 1803 CE was a crucial time in American history that had significant positive and negative consequences. The adoption of the United States Constitution and the Louisiana Purchase were pivotal events that shaped the nation's political and economic trajectory. However, it is essential to acknowledge and learn from the negative impacts of these events, such as the displacement and oppression of Native American tribes. By studying this period, we can better understand the complexities of American history and inform our actions moving forward.
THE RUNDOWN
- The period between 1786 CE and 1803 CE was crucial in American history.
- The United States Constitution was drafted and adopted in 1787, replacing the Articles of Confederation.
- The Constitution established the framework for the federal government and laid out the rights and responsibilities of citizens.
- The adoption of the Constitution was controversial, with concerns about giving too much power to the federal government.
- The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to protect individual liberties.
- The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 nearly doubled the size of the United States and provided new opportunities for settlement and expansion.
- The Louisiana Purchase also had negative consequences, such as the displacement and oppression of Native American tribes.
- Studying this period is crucial to understanding the complexities of American history and learning from both the positive and negative aspects of these events.
QUESTIONS
- What were the main factors that led to the adoption of the United States Constitution in 1788?
- In what ways did the Louisiana Purchase shape the economy and geography of the United States?
- What were some of the criticisms of the Constitution, and how were these addressed in the Bill of Rights?
#6 No Cherry-Picking
History, you are a cruel mistress. Some days you are a fun romp that looks at our past; other days, you are a sad reminder of our shortcomings and failures. Sometimes you are a well-documented account, with 1000s of books written on your behalf. Other times you are a convoluted mess, an untidy murder scene riddled with more questions than answers. Either way, rule number 6 of history: No cherry-picking. For those unfamiliar with the concept, cherry-picking is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar topics or data that may contradict that position. Cherry-picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally, but births the same results. History is not entirely exceptional, and nor is it wholly evil. And to not attempt to remain a centrist in these matters does a disservice to the historical community.
In the realm of historical study, "cherry-picking" takes on a new meaning. It refers to the insidious practice of choosing only certain events or aspects of history to fit one's agenda or perspective. This kind of selective interpretation can be hazardous, as it can lead to a distorted and incomplete understanding of the past. It can be used to justify oppressive systems or to whitewash the actions of those in power. However, it's not all bad. The practice of cherry-picking can also be used to shed light on marginalized or overlooked perspectives or to challenge dominant narratives. Regardless of the intent, it's crucial that we, as historians and citizens strive to avoid cherry-picking and instead strive for a more nuanced and complete understanding of the past. Only then can we truly grasp the complexity and richness of history and make informed decisions about the present and future.
Ah, the beauty of cherry-picking historical events. It's like picking the juiciest, ripest cherries from the tree of time. And let me tell you, the Civil Rights Movement in the United States was one hell of a cherry. It brought to light the injustices and inequalities faced by African Americans, shining a spotlight on the ugly issue of racism and discrimination. Thanks to this cherry-picked event, activists and educators were able to rally the masses and bring about change. And that, my friends, is the sweetest fruit of all. Another perk of selecting a specific moment in history and holding it up as a shining example is how it can light a fire under people's butts. Take the American Revolution, for instance. We often cherry-pick the parts that speak to the principles of liberty and self-governance and use them as a call to arms for those who give a shit about creating a more fair and equal world. It's a reminder that real change is possible, and it's up to us to make it happen.
But let's remember the dark side of cherry-picking a historical event. It can lead to a twisted and twisted version of the past, like a distorted carnival mirror. Take the Civil Rights Movement, for instance. If you only focus on the glories of Martin Luther King Jr. without paying attention to the bigger picture, you're missing the whole point. You're ignoring the contributions of all the others who fought alongside him and the social and political climate of the time. Another sinister outcome of selective interpretation of historical events is manipulating the past to justify oppressive actions in the present. When the American Revolution is reduced to a mere celebration of freedom and democracy, it becomes a tool for those in power to condone the atrocities of American imperialism and the subjugation of Indigenous nations. Such cherry-picked history is a dangerous weapon in the hands of those who seek to uphold their power and privilege.
To ensure your understanding of history is maintained, you must start looking at things from all angles. You have to dig deep and look at many primary and secondary sources. And don't just read one interpretation of an event; look at it from different perspectives. You need to pick and choose what you like and ignore the rest.
But most importantly, be aware of your own biases. They're sneaky little buggers that can mess with your understanding of history. So watch out for them, and keep an open mind. Cherry-picking history is like its namesake: picking through a bowl of cherries, you might find a few good ones, but you're bound to miss out on the complete picture. Sure, it can shine a light on important issues and inspire change, but it can also lead to a distorted understanding of the past and justify sketchy actions and policies. To truly understand history, you must take a big bite, consider all the different perspectives, and be aware of your biases.
In short, there is a current trend to politize American history as either American exceptionalism or a country founded solely on oppression. The truth is, both are right.
THE RUNDOWN
History, you are a cruel mistress. Some days you are a fun romp that looks at our past; other days, you are a sad reminder of our shortcomings and failures. Sometimes you are a well-documented account, with 1000s of books written on your behalf. Other times you are a convoluted mess, an untidy murder scene riddled with more questions than answers. Either way, rule number 6 of history: No cherry-picking. For those unfamiliar with the concept, cherry-picking is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar topics or data that may contradict that position. Cherry-picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally, but births the same results. History is not entirely exceptional, and nor is it wholly evil. And to not attempt to remain a centrist in these matters does a disservice to the historical community.
In the realm of historical study, "cherry-picking" takes on a new meaning. It refers to the insidious practice of choosing only certain events or aspects of history to fit one's agenda or perspective. This kind of selective interpretation can be hazardous, as it can lead to a distorted and incomplete understanding of the past. It can be used to justify oppressive systems or to whitewash the actions of those in power. However, it's not all bad. The practice of cherry-picking can also be used to shed light on marginalized or overlooked perspectives or to challenge dominant narratives. Regardless of the intent, it's crucial that we, as historians and citizens strive to avoid cherry-picking and instead strive for a more nuanced and complete understanding of the past. Only then can we truly grasp the complexity and richness of history and make informed decisions about the present and future.
Ah, the beauty of cherry-picking historical events. It's like picking the juiciest, ripest cherries from the tree of time. And let me tell you, the Civil Rights Movement in the United States was one hell of a cherry. It brought to light the injustices and inequalities faced by African Americans, shining a spotlight on the ugly issue of racism and discrimination. Thanks to this cherry-picked event, activists and educators were able to rally the masses and bring about change. And that, my friends, is the sweetest fruit of all. Another perk of selecting a specific moment in history and holding it up as a shining example is how it can light a fire under people's butts. Take the American Revolution, for instance. We often cherry-pick the parts that speak to the principles of liberty and self-governance and use them as a call to arms for those who give a shit about creating a more fair and equal world. It's a reminder that real change is possible, and it's up to us to make it happen.
But let's remember the dark side of cherry-picking a historical event. It can lead to a twisted and twisted version of the past, like a distorted carnival mirror. Take the Civil Rights Movement, for instance. If you only focus on the glories of Martin Luther King Jr. without paying attention to the bigger picture, you're missing the whole point. You're ignoring the contributions of all the others who fought alongside him and the social and political climate of the time. Another sinister outcome of selective interpretation of historical events is manipulating the past to justify oppressive actions in the present. When the American Revolution is reduced to a mere celebration of freedom and democracy, it becomes a tool for those in power to condone the atrocities of American imperialism and the subjugation of Indigenous nations. Such cherry-picked history is a dangerous weapon in the hands of those who seek to uphold their power and privilege.
To ensure your understanding of history is maintained, you must start looking at things from all angles. You have to dig deep and look at many primary and secondary sources. And don't just read one interpretation of an event; look at it from different perspectives. You need to pick and choose what you like and ignore the rest.
But most importantly, be aware of your own biases. They're sneaky little buggers that can mess with your understanding of history. So watch out for them, and keep an open mind. Cherry-picking history is like its namesake: picking through a bowl of cherries, you might find a few good ones, but you're bound to miss out on the complete picture. Sure, it can shine a light on important issues and inspire change, but it can also lead to a distorted understanding of the past and justify sketchy actions and policies. To truly understand history, you must take a big bite, consider all the different perspectives, and be aware of your biases.
In short, there is a current trend to politize American history as either American exceptionalism or a country founded solely on oppression. The truth is, both are right.
THE RUNDOWN
- History is a complicated and diverse topic.
- When people "cherry-pick," they select certain historical events to explain what happened in the past.
- This can make their interpretation inaccurate and incomplete.
- Some people use cherry-picking to justify oppressive systems, while others use it to question commonly accepted ideas.
- It's crucial to avoid cherry-picking and aim for a balanced understanding of history.
- Looking at specific historical moments can motivate positive change but also distort our perception of the past.
- To truly understand history, we need to consider all points of view and be aware of our biases.
- There is a tendency to politicize American history by emphasizing its exceptionalism or focusing on its oppression, but both are true.
December 20, 1803 - The United States purchased Louisiana from France.
1803—a year where chaos and order danced a delicate minuet, each striving for dominance in the grand ballroom of history. Picture a world in political upheaval, societal transformation, and technological sorcery. Napoleon Bonaparte, the petite powerhouse, waltzed across Europe, redrawing borders with the flick of his pen or sword, a figure of immense influence. At the same time, across the Atlantic, President Thomas Jefferson doubled the size of the United States with the Louisiana Purchase, as if acquiring a slightly used continent was just another Wednesday. The British Empire, that globe-trotting giant, managed its sprawling colonies with the casual aplomb of an aristocrat balancing a teacup. Amidst the Industrial Revolution’s smoky urban jungles, factories sprouted, cities swelled, and the specter of slavery loomed large, though the abolitionist movement stirred in Britain. Populations burgeoned, cities groaned under their weight, and while John Dalton unveiled atomic secrets, the Romantics in literature and arts declared war on the Enlightenment’s stiff upper lip. Exploration was the buzzword, with Lewis and Clark embarking on their epic trek into the unknown Louisiana Territory. Daily life blended the mundane and magical with leisurely horse-drawn carriages and burgeoning steam engines, as communication relied on letters and newspapers trickling information. Living conditions varied by social standing, with rural folk tied to seasonal rhythms and urbanites navigating the burgeoning cities’ hustle and bustle. In this swirling vortex of change, 1803 was a crucible forging modernity, a time when the world’s stage was crowded with players, each vying for their moment in the spotlight, dancing to a familiar and very absurd tune.
HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
- RPTM #021 Shay’s Rebellion, Articles of Confederation, Northwest Ordinance, Constitution, and Homosexuality (37:49)
- RPTM #022 The Bald Eagle, The American Novel, Whiskey Rebellion, and Latinos (35:22)
- RPTM #023 Eli Whitney, Cookbooks, Bank Heists, and American Fitness (39:52)
- RPTM #024 Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings, Alexander Hamilton, and the Louisiana Purchase (41:19)
The Reading section—a realm where our aspirations of enlightenment often clash with the harsh realities of procrastination and the desperate reliance on Google. We soldier on through dense texts, promised 'broadening perspectives' but often wrestling with existential dread and academic pressure. With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a strong cup of coffee, I'll be your guide on this wild journey from dusty tomes to the murky depths of postmodernism. In the midst of all the pretentious prose, there's a glimmer of insight: we're all in this together, united in our struggle to survive without losing our sanity.
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Carnes, Mark C., and John A. Garraty. American Destiny: Narrative of a Nation. 4th ed. Vol. 1.: Pearson, 2011.
Mark C. Carnes and John A. Garraty are respected historians who have made notable contributions to American history. First, we've got Carnes - this guy's a real maverick when it comes to studying the good ol' US of A. He's all about the secret societies that helped shape our culture in the 1800s. You know, the ones that operated behind closed doors had their fingers in all sorts of pies. Carnes is the man who can unravel those mysteries and give us a glimpse into the underbelly of American culture. We've also got Garraty in the mix. This guy's no slouch either - he's known for taking a big-picture view of American history and bringing it to life with his engaging writing style. Whether profiling famous figures from our past or digging deep into a particular aspect of our nation's history, Garraty always keeps it accurate and accessible. You don't need a Ph.D. to understand what he's saying, and that's why he's a true heavyweight in the field.
RUNDOWN
READING
- Carnes Chapter 6 “The Federalist Era: Nationalism Triumphant"
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Carnes, Mark C., and John A. Garraty. American Destiny: Narrative of a Nation. 4th ed. Vol. 1.: Pearson, 2011.
Mark C. Carnes and John A. Garraty are respected historians who have made notable contributions to American history. First, we've got Carnes - this guy's a real maverick when it comes to studying the good ol' US of A. He's all about the secret societies that helped shape our culture in the 1800s. You know, the ones that operated behind closed doors had their fingers in all sorts of pies. Carnes is the man who can unravel those mysteries and give us a glimpse into the underbelly of American culture. We've also got Garraty in the mix. This guy's no slouch either - he's known for taking a big-picture view of American history and bringing it to life with his engaging writing style. Whether profiling famous figures from our past or digging deep into a particular aspect of our nation's history, Garraty always keeps it accurate and accessible. You don't need a Ph.D. to understand what he's saying, and that's why he's a true heavyweight in the field.
RUNDOWN
- The new U.S. government under the Constitution started strong, with George Washington as the first president in 1789.
- Led by Alexander Hamilton, the Federalists wanted a strong national government to support economic growth and stability.
- Hamilton, as Secretary of the Treasury, proposed paying off war debts, creating a national bank, and encouraging manufacturing. This plan aimed to strengthen the nation’s economy.
- Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, leaders of the Democratic-Republican Party, opposed Hamilton’s plan. They favored more power for states and an economy based on farming.
- The disagreement over Hamilton’s plan led to the formation of the first political parties: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans.
- The U.S. faced issues with Britain and France. Washington’s administration tried to keep the country neutral to avoid war.
- To avoid conflict with Britain, the U.S. signed Jay’s Treaty in 1794. It was unpopular but prevented war.
- In 1794, farmers in Pennsylvania protested a tax on whiskey. Washington’s response showed the power of the new government to enforce laws.
- In 1796, Washington warned against political parties and foreign alliances in his Farewell Address, setting a precedent for future presidents.
- John Adams became the second president. His administration faced the XYZ Affair, a diplomatic conflict with France that led to an undeclared naval war.
- In response to the XYZ Affair, the Federalists passed these laws to restrict immigrants and limit speech critical of the government. They were very controversial.
- Jefferson and Madison wrote these resolutions to argue that states could nullify federal laws they believed were unconstitutional.
- The intense election between Adams and Jefferson ended with Jefferson’s victory, marking the first peaceful transfer of power between political parties in U.S. history.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights shows that quality of interest hiding behind innocence. Passed in 1791 by Congress, it provided that 'Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. . . ."'Yet, seven years after the First
Amendment became part of the Constitution, Congress passed a law very clearly abridging the freedom of speech.
This was the Sedition Act of 1798, passed under John Adams's administration, at a time when Irishmen and Frenchmen in the United States were looked on as dangerous revolutionaries because of the recent French Revolution and the Irish rebellions. The Sedition Act made it a crime to say or write anything 'false, scandalous and malicious' against the government, Congress, or the President, with intent to defame them, bring them into disrepute, or excite popular hatreds against them.
This act seemed to directly violate the First Amendment. Yet, it was enforced. Ten Americans were put in prison for utterances against the government, and every member of the Supreme Court in 1798-1800, sitting as an appellate judge, held it constitutional..."
"... The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights shows that quality of interest hiding behind innocence. Passed in 1791 by Congress, it provided that 'Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. . . ."'Yet, seven years after the First
Amendment became part of the Constitution, Congress passed a law very clearly abridging the freedom of speech.
This was the Sedition Act of 1798, passed under John Adams's administration, at a time when Irishmen and Frenchmen in the United States were looked on as dangerous revolutionaries because of the recent French Revolution and the Irish rebellions. The Sedition Act made it a crime to say or write anything 'false, scandalous and malicious' against the government, Congress, or the President, with intent to defame them, bring them into disrepute, or excite popular hatreds against them.
This act seemed to directly violate the First Amendment. Yet, it was enforced. Ten Americans were put in prison for utterances against the government, and every member of the Supreme Court in 1798-1800, sitting as an appellate judge, held it constitutional..."
Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
"... Meanwhile, buoyed by a 1798 electoral sweep, the so-called arch-Federalists in Congress continued to call for war against France. Pointing to alleged treason at home, they passed a set of extreme laws—the Alien and Sedition Acts—that would prove their political undoing. A Naturalization Act, aimed at French and Irish immigrants, increased from four to fourteen the number of years required for American citizenship. The fact that these immigrants were nearly all Catholics and Republicans no doubt weighed heavily in deciding their fate. A new Alien Act gave the president the power to deport some of these 'dangerous Aliens,' while the Sedition Act allowed the Federalists to escalate their offensive against American Francophiles by abridging First Amendment speech rights. The Sedition Acts forbade conduct or language leading to rebellion, and although the wording remained rather vague, Federalist judges evidently understood it. Under the act, they arrested, tried, convicted, and jailed or fined twenty-five people, mostly Republican newspaper editors, including Matthew Lyon, a jailed Republican congressman who won his reelection while still behind bars.
Application of modern-day values, not to mention civil liberties laws, would make the Alien and Sedition Acts seem outrageous infringements on personal liberties. In context, the sedition clauses originated in the libel and slander laws of the day. Personal honor was a value most Americans heldquite dear, and malicious slurs often resulted in duels. The president of the United States, subjected to vile criticism, had no means of redress to defamatory comments. It would be almost a half century before courts routinely held that a much higher bar governed the protection of public figures’ reputations or character from attacks that, to an ordinary citizen, might be considered libelous or slanderous..."
"... Meanwhile, buoyed by a 1798 electoral sweep, the so-called arch-Federalists in Congress continued to call for war against France. Pointing to alleged treason at home, they passed a set of extreme laws—the Alien and Sedition Acts—that would prove their political undoing. A Naturalization Act, aimed at French and Irish immigrants, increased from four to fourteen the number of years required for American citizenship. The fact that these immigrants were nearly all Catholics and Republicans no doubt weighed heavily in deciding their fate. A new Alien Act gave the president the power to deport some of these 'dangerous Aliens,' while the Sedition Act allowed the Federalists to escalate their offensive against American Francophiles by abridging First Amendment speech rights. The Sedition Acts forbade conduct or language leading to rebellion, and although the wording remained rather vague, Federalist judges evidently understood it. Under the act, they arrested, tried, convicted, and jailed or fined twenty-five people, mostly Republican newspaper editors, including Matthew Lyon, a jailed Republican congressman who won his reelection while still behind bars.
Application of modern-day values, not to mention civil liberties laws, would make the Alien and Sedition Acts seem outrageous infringements on personal liberties. In context, the sedition clauses originated in the libel and slander laws of the day. Personal honor was a value most Americans heldquite dear, and malicious slurs often resulted in duels. The president of the United States, subjected to vile criticism, had no means of redress to defamatory comments. It would be almost a half century before courts routinely held that a much higher bar governed the protection of public figures’ reputations or character from attacks that, to an ordinary citizen, might be considered libelous or slanderous..."
Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
"... First came the Irish, a notoriously funky people. Long before they arrived in America, the Irish were known as 'a filthy people, wallowing in vice,' as a twelfth-century English writer put it. They 'live like beasts,' 'do not avoid incest,' and 'have not progressed at all from the habits of pastoral living.' The poet Edmund Spenser wrote in 1596 that the Irish lived in “the most barbaric and loathy conditions of
any people (I think) under heaven. . They do use all the beastly behaviour that may be, they oppress all men, they spoil as well the subject, as the enemy; they steal, they are cruel and bloody, full of revenge, and delighting in deadly execution, licentious, swearers and blasphemers, common ravishers of women, and murderers of children.' British historian Thomas Carlyle visited Ireland in 1849 and found a 'drunk country fallen down to sleep in the mud.' The Irish, he wrote, were a 'brawling unreasonable people,' a “human swinery,' and 'a black howling Babel of superstitious savages.' Clergyman Charles Kingsley was similarly shaken by his travels in Ireland. In 1860 he wrote to his wife, 'I am haunted by the human chimpanzees I saw along that hundred miles of horrible country .. to see white chimpanzees is dreadful; if they were black, one would not see it so much, but their skins, except where tanned by exposure, are as white as ours.' Two years later, the British magazine Punch proclaimed the Irish as the “missing link” between man and simian..."
"... First came the Irish, a notoriously funky people. Long before they arrived in America, the Irish were known as 'a filthy people, wallowing in vice,' as a twelfth-century English writer put it. They 'live like beasts,' 'do not avoid incest,' and 'have not progressed at all from the habits of pastoral living.' The poet Edmund Spenser wrote in 1596 that the Irish lived in “the most barbaric and loathy conditions of
any people (I think) under heaven. . They do use all the beastly behaviour that may be, they oppress all men, they spoil as well the subject, as the enemy; they steal, they are cruel and bloody, full of revenge, and delighting in deadly execution, licentious, swearers and blasphemers, common ravishers of women, and murderers of children.' British historian Thomas Carlyle visited Ireland in 1849 and found a 'drunk country fallen down to sleep in the mud.' The Irish, he wrote, were a 'brawling unreasonable people,' a “human swinery,' and 'a black howling Babel of superstitious savages.' Clergyman Charles Kingsley was similarly shaken by his travels in Ireland. In 1860 he wrote to his wife, 'I am haunted by the human chimpanzees I saw along that hundred miles of horrible country .. to see white chimpanzees is dreadful; if they were black, one would not see it so much, but their skins, except where tanned by exposure, are as white as ours.' Two years later, the British magazine Punch proclaimed the Irish as the “missing link” between man and simian..."
Like a caped crusader, the First Amendment, the magnificent superhero of our constitutional freedoms, stands bravely at the forefront, guarding and championing the sanctity of our rights to speech, religion, and press. It serves as the embodiment of democratic vitality, ensuring its enduring pulse. Yet, let us pause momentarily, for history unveils the unsettling presence of the Sedition Act of 1798, a formidable nemesis that infiltrated the realm of liberty. With its criminal allure, it imposed a somber dampening upon the airwaves of conversation, casting a shroud upon the salacious whispers and scandalous discussions that reveled in dissecting the affairs of the government, rendering them illicit, extinguishing the flame of unbridled expression.
The delicate dance between national security and individual liberties—an intricate performance akin to defying gravity on a flaming tightrope, with every step laden with risk. The Sedition Act, once hailed as a safeguard against political dissent and foreign interference, ultimately became a sledgehammer that mercilessly crushed the right to free expression—a sad blow to those daring souls who dared to raise their voices against the government. Fortunately, amidst this disheartening cacophony, the historic John Peter Zenger case emerged as a turning point, casting a spotlight on the vital importance of preserving the freedom of the press for the journeys ahead.
And yet, amidst the tempestuous sea of adversity, the Irish immigrants of yore forged a narrative of resilience that echoed through the annals of history. Upon arriving on American shores, they encountered a deluge of prejudice and discrimination, an unwelcome storm cloud shadowing their every step. The Irish, with their distinct brogue and unfamiliar customs, were seen as infringing on the established order; their very existence posed a perceived threat to the American way of life. Jobs were few and far between, elusive as a ghost ship on the horizon, while social acceptance seemed an elusive mirage shimmering in the distance. These weary wanderers found little solace in the political landscape either, as acerbic cartoons rendered their struggles and aspirations with distorted strokes of mockery. Yet, like the stubborn clover that defiantly sprouts amidst the most barren fields, the Irish persevered. They built communities and institutions, unraveling the tightly woven threads of discrimination with their brand of tenacity. Through gritty determination, they harnessed their grit and wit, transforming the notion of "bad news" into an unwavering beacon of resilience. They left an indelible mark on the fabric of America, transcending the confines of the past to redefine what it means to be Irish in a land that was simultaneously their haven and battlefield.
Now, why, in the name of whiskey-soaked lunacy, should any self-respecting soul give a damn about this tangled web of history? Let me tell you, my friend, it's a rocky road we tread, one where the specters of the past creep up from the cracked pavement and gnaw at the very fabric of our constitutional freedoms. There lies the key, buried beneath the rubble of forgotten days – the power to learn, to heed the warnings etched into the ashen walls of yesteryear. See, the First Amendment, that twisted knot of contradictions and challenges, serves as our perilous guide through the treacherous waters of modern discourse. By cracking open the tattered pages of that cheat sheet, we can circumvent the traps and pitfalls that lurk in the shadowy corners of present-day debates, forging a path of enlightenment that snakes through the landmines of ignorance. So, yes, my friend, we should care, for the echoes of the past, when captured in the prism of understanding, become our rallying cry for a future where our constitutional liberties endure, unmarred by the mistakes we dare not repeat.
We're grappling with the eternal problem, deciphering the delicate dance between safeguarding national security and upholding the sacred sanctity of individual rights without spiraling into the abyss of excess. No, we can't recklessly stomp upon the essence of people's freedoms, masquerading it as a benevolent act in the pursuit of safety. A flicker of wisdom emerges from gazing upon the tapestry of history, guiding us toward prudent decisions that shield our beloved nation and the cherished bastions of liberty we hold dear.
We mustn't turn a blind eye to the never-ending fight against discrimination. It's a war that we must wage tirelessly, staying vigilant and ever-determined. In the tales of the Irish immigrants' plight, we uncover the breadcrumbs of knowledge leading us toward a world of equity and justice. The annals of history, dear reader, serve as a sobering reminder of the dire consequences when prejudice reigns unchecked. Therefore, it is our solemn duty to shatter that relentless cycle to forge a path free from the chains of bias and injustice. And so, let us march hand in hand, armed with compassion and understanding, as we strive to build a society that knows no discrimination.
Consider this: the intertwined tales of the First Amendment, the infamous Sedition Act of 1798, and the indomitable Irish immigrant experience offer us a sumptuous feast of enlightenment. These narratives reveal, without a doubt, that safeguarding our liberties is a maddeningly complex endeavor but unquestionably worth every ounce of sweat and toil. As we delve into the rich tapestry of history, we metamorphose into fearless warriors armed with knowledge on an unwavering pilgrimage toward justice and inclusivity. So, let us savor the flavors of these democratic values, keep them alive, and relish the vibrant pulse they bring to our collective spirit.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
The delicate dance between national security and individual liberties—an intricate performance akin to defying gravity on a flaming tightrope, with every step laden with risk. The Sedition Act, once hailed as a safeguard against political dissent and foreign interference, ultimately became a sledgehammer that mercilessly crushed the right to free expression—a sad blow to those daring souls who dared to raise their voices against the government. Fortunately, amidst this disheartening cacophony, the historic John Peter Zenger case emerged as a turning point, casting a spotlight on the vital importance of preserving the freedom of the press for the journeys ahead.
And yet, amidst the tempestuous sea of adversity, the Irish immigrants of yore forged a narrative of resilience that echoed through the annals of history. Upon arriving on American shores, they encountered a deluge of prejudice and discrimination, an unwelcome storm cloud shadowing their every step. The Irish, with their distinct brogue and unfamiliar customs, were seen as infringing on the established order; their very existence posed a perceived threat to the American way of life. Jobs were few and far between, elusive as a ghost ship on the horizon, while social acceptance seemed an elusive mirage shimmering in the distance. These weary wanderers found little solace in the political landscape either, as acerbic cartoons rendered their struggles and aspirations with distorted strokes of mockery. Yet, like the stubborn clover that defiantly sprouts amidst the most barren fields, the Irish persevered. They built communities and institutions, unraveling the tightly woven threads of discrimination with their brand of tenacity. Through gritty determination, they harnessed their grit and wit, transforming the notion of "bad news" into an unwavering beacon of resilience. They left an indelible mark on the fabric of America, transcending the confines of the past to redefine what it means to be Irish in a land that was simultaneously their haven and battlefield.
Now, why, in the name of whiskey-soaked lunacy, should any self-respecting soul give a damn about this tangled web of history? Let me tell you, my friend, it's a rocky road we tread, one where the specters of the past creep up from the cracked pavement and gnaw at the very fabric of our constitutional freedoms. There lies the key, buried beneath the rubble of forgotten days – the power to learn, to heed the warnings etched into the ashen walls of yesteryear. See, the First Amendment, that twisted knot of contradictions and challenges, serves as our perilous guide through the treacherous waters of modern discourse. By cracking open the tattered pages of that cheat sheet, we can circumvent the traps and pitfalls that lurk in the shadowy corners of present-day debates, forging a path of enlightenment that snakes through the landmines of ignorance. So, yes, my friend, we should care, for the echoes of the past, when captured in the prism of understanding, become our rallying cry for a future where our constitutional liberties endure, unmarred by the mistakes we dare not repeat.
We're grappling with the eternal problem, deciphering the delicate dance between safeguarding national security and upholding the sacred sanctity of individual rights without spiraling into the abyss of excess. No, we can't recklessly stomp upon the essence of people's freedoms, masquerading it as a benevolent act in the pursuit of safety. A flicker of wisdom emerges from gazing upon the tapestry of history, guiding us toward prudent decisions that shield our beloved nation and the cherished bastions of liberty we hold dear.
We mustn't turn a blind eye to the never-ending fight against discrimination. It's a war that we must wage tirelessly, staying vigilant and ever-determined. In the tales of the Irish immigrants' plight, we uncover the breadcrumbs of knowledge leading us toward a world of equity and justice. The annals of history, dear reader, serve as a sobering reminder of the dire consequences when prejudice reigns unchecked. Therefore, it is our solemn duty to shatter that relentless cycle to forge a path free from the chains of bias and injustice. And so, let us march hand in hand, armed with compassion and understanding, as we strive to build a society that knows no discrimination.
Consider this: the intertwined tales of the First Amendment, the infamous Sedition Act of 1798, and the indomitable Irish immigrant experience offer us a sumptuous feast of enlightenment. These narratives reveal, without a doubt, that safeguarding our liberties is a maddeningly complex endeavor but unquestionably worth every ounce of sweat and toil. As we delve into the rich tapestry of history, we metamorphose into fearless warriors armed with knowledge on an unwavering pilgrimage toward justice and inclusivity. So, let us savor the flavors of these democratic values, keep them alive, and relish the vibrant pulse they bring to our collective spirit.
THE RUNDOWN
- The First Amendment is like a superhero that protects our rights to free speech, religion, and press.
- The Sedition Act of 1798 was a law that restricted people's freedom of expression and punished those who criticized the government.
- The John Peter Zenger case showed the importance of preserving the freedom of the press.
- Irish immigrants faced discrimination and prejudice when they came to America.
- Irish immigrants faced challenges in finding jobs and being accepted in society.
- They persevered and built communities, overcoming discrimination with determination.
- Learning from history helps us protect our constitutional freedoms and avoid past mistakes.
- Balancing national security and individual liberties is a difficult task.
- We should fight against discrimination and strive for a society without bias and injustice.
- Safeguarding our liberties requires effort, but it is worth it for justice and inclusivity.
QUESTIONS
- How did the Irish immigrants face prejudice and discrimination upon arriving in America? What specific challenges did they encounter, and how did they overcome them?
- Discuss the role of political cartoons in portraying and perpetuating stereotypes against Irish immigrants. How did these cartoons reflect the prevailing attitudes of the time, and how did they impact Irish communities?
- What lessons can we learn from the struggles of the Irish immigrants in terms of resilience, community building, and the fight against discrimination? How can their experiences inspire us to address discrimination in contemporary society?
In this cartoon from Harper's Weekly, a priest and an Irish Catholic cut open the Democratic Party seeking more benefits. Thomas Nast often depicted the Irish as apelike.
Prepare to be transported into the captivating realm of historical films and videos. Brace yourselves for a mind-bending odyssey through time as we embark on a cinematic expedition. Within these flickering frames, the past morphs into a vivid tapestry of triumphs, tragedies, and transformative moments that have shaped the very fabric of our existence. We shall immerse ourselves in a whirlwind of visual narratives, dissecting the nuances of artistic interpretations, examining the storytelling techniques, and voraciously devouring historical accuracy with the ferocity of a time-traveling historian. So strap in, hold tight, and prepare to have your perception of history forever shattered by the mesmerizing lens of the camera.
THE RUNDOWN
In 1801, America faced losing territory to foreign powers. But a twist of fate and individual choices led to the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. The US doubled to a mere $15 million, gaining 828,000 square miles. Initially deemed worthless, the land became six states and parts of nine others. Court intrigues, Napoleon's ego, ice storms, and Haiti's rebellion influenced the acquisition. Louisiana passed from France to Spain, frustrating American settlers. But Spain recognized the need for better relations and restored access to the New Orleans port. Thomas Jefferson believed Americans would settle in Louisiana regardless. Napoleon sought to dominate it, pressuring Spain for a swap, but it fell through. His campaign in Haiti failed, and the rebels' tactics and immunity to diseases prevailed. Storms and ice halted the French invasion. Reports of a secret treaty alarmed the US, but Jefferson chose diplomacy. The Louisiana Purchase was negotiated, offering the entire territory to the US. Debates followed, but they secured American expansion and dashed French ambitions. Jefferson's achievement made the US a transcontinental nation and a global power.
THE RUNDOWN
In 1801, America faced losing territory to foreign powers. But a twist of fate and individual choices led to the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. The US doubled to a mere $15 million, gaining 828,000 square miles. Initially deemed worthless, the land became six states and parts of nine others. Court intrigues, Napoleon's ego, ice storms, and Haiti's rebellion influenced the acquisition. Louisiana passed from France to Spain, frustrating American settlers. But Spain recognized the need for better relations and restored access to the New Orleans port. Thomas Jefferson believed Americans would settle in Louisiana regardless. Napoleon sought to dominate it, pressuring Spain for a swap, but it fell through. His campaign in Haiti failed, and the rebels' tactics and immunity to diseases prevailed. Storms and ice halted the French invasion. Reports of a secret treaty alarmed the US, but Jefferson chose diplomacy. The Louisiana Purchase was negotiated, offering the entire territory to the US. Debates followed, but they secured American expansion and dashed French ambitions. Jefferson's achievement made the US a transcontinental nation and a global power.
Welcome to the mind-bending Key Terms extravaganza of our history class learning module. Brace yourselves; we will unravel the cryptic codes, secret handshakes, and linguistic labyrinths that make up the twisted tapestry of historical knowledge. These key terms are the Rosetta Stones of our academic journey, the skeleton keys to unlocking the enigmatic doors of comprehension. They're like historical Swiss Army knives, equipped with blades of definition and corkscrews of contextual examples, ready to pierce through the fog of confusion and liberate your intellectual curiosity. By harnessing the power of these mighty key terms, you'll possess the superhuman ability to traverse the treacherous terrains of primary sources, surf the tumultuous waves of academic texts, and engage in epic battles of historical debate. The past awaits, and the key terms are keys to unlocking its dazzling secrets.
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
- Shay's Rebellion
- Articles of Confederation
- The Constitution
- Northwest Ordinance
- Homosexuality in the 18th Century
- The Bald Eagle
- Alcohol in the Late 18th Century
- The First American Novel
- The Kentucky Volunteer
- The Whiskey Rebellion
- Latinos in the Late 18th Century
- Eli Whitney
- American Cookery
- Alien and Sedition Acts
- The First Bank Heist
- National Period of Fitness
- Sally Hemings
- Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton
- Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr
- The Burr Conspiracy
- Louisiana Purchase
DISCLAIMER: Welcome scholars to the wild and wacky world of history class. This isn't your granddaddy's boring ol' lecture, baby. We will take a trip through time, which will be one wild ride. I know some of you are in a brick-and-mortar setting, while others are in the vast digital wasteland. But fear not; we're all in this together. Online students might miss out on some in-person interaction, but you can still join in on the fun. This little shindig aims to get you all engaged with the course material and understand how past societies have shaped the world we know today. We'll talk about revolutions, wars, and other crazy stuff. So get ready, kids, because it's going to be one heck of a trip. And for all, you online students out there, don't be shy. Please share your thoughts and ideas with the rest of us. The Professor will do his best to give everyone an equal opportunity to learn, so don't hold back. So, let's do this thing!
Activity: Shay's Rebellion War Simulation
Objective: Experience the challenges Daniel Shays and his followers faced during Shays' Rebellion. Your goal is to make strategic decisions that could potentially alter the course of history, leading your army of farmers and war veterans against the Massachusetts government, fighting for justice and debt relief. Learn about the obstacles and choices that shaped one of the most significant uprisings in early American history.
Instructions:
Remember, each decision matters! Lead wisely, and discover how the choices made during Shays' Rebellion affected the future of the United States.
Activity: Shay's Rebellion War Simulation
Objective: Experience the challenges Daniel Shays and his followers faced during Shays' Rebellion. Your goal is to make strategic decisions that could potentially alter the course of history, leading your army of farmers and war veterans against the Massachusetts government, fighting for justice and debt relief. Learn about the obstacles and choices that shaped one of the most significant uprisings in early American history.
Instructions:
- Read Each Scenario: At the beginning of each round, you’ll be presented with a new situation based on actual events from Shays' Rebellion.
- Make Strategic Decisions: Choose from the available options to decide how Shays and his men should act. Each choice has consequences that affect the rebellion’s success.
- Manage Resources and Morale: Your decisions will impact the morale and resources of your troops. Keep them motivated and well-supplied so they can continue fighting.
- Reach the Final Round: Navigate through ten decisions and see if your leadership can change the course of history.
- Reset and Replay: After the game ends, you can reset and try different strategies to explore alternative outcomes.
Remember, each decision matters! Lead wisely, and discover how the choices made during Shays' Rebellion affected the future of the United States.
Shays's Rebellion: War Simulation
Welcome, Captain Daniel Shays! Your mission is to lead your ragtag army of farmers and war veterans against the oppressive Massachusetts government. Make strategic decisions to survive and fight for your cause!
Activity #2: The Burr Conspiracy- Choose Your Path
Objective: Explore the Burr Conspiracy and make strategic decisions to determine the fate of Aaron Burr’s plot to form a separate empire in the early 19th century. Your choices will impact the outcome of Burr’s ambitions, revealing the consequences of his actions.
Instructions:
Objective: Explore the Burr Conspiracy and make strategic decisions to determine the fate of Aaron Burr’s plot to form a separate empire in the early 19th century. Your choices will impact the outcome of Burr’s ambitions, revealing the consequences of his actions.
Instructions:
- Read Each Scenario: You will be presented with a series of historical scenarios based on Aaron Burr's actions and decisions.
- Make Your Choice: For each scenario, you will have two options. Click the button that represents the choice you think Burr should make.
- Watch Your Score: Each decision you make will add or subtract points from your total score, reflecting the success or failure of Burr’s plans.
- Reach the End: Keep making decisions until you reach the final scenario. Your final score will determine how successful Burr was in his conspiracy.
- Learn from the Outcome: At the end of the game, your score will reveal the historical consequences of Burr’s actions. See if his plot ends in triumph, failure, or something in between!
The Burr Conspiracy: Choose Your Path
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for the pièce de résistance of this classroom module - the summary section. As we embark on this tantalizing journey, we'll savor the exquisite flavors of knowledge, highlighting the fundamental ingredients and spices that have seasoned our minds throughout these captivating lessons. Prepare to indulge in a savory recap that will leave your intellectual taste buds tingling, serving as a passport to further enlightenment.
Between 1786 CE and 1803 CE, America experienced a pivotal period that left a mark on its history. It all began with the drafting and adoption of the United States Constitution in 1787, replacing those pesky Articles of Confederation. This Constitution set the stage for the federal government and laid out the rights and responsibilities of us citizens. But it wasn't all smooth sailing. There were folks who had concerns about giving too much power to the big boys in the central government. To address those worries, they tacked on the Bill of Rights to the Constitution just to make sure individual liberties were protected.
Then, in 1803, something big happened: the Louisiana Purchase. It was like America got a growth spurt, doubling in size and opening up new horizons for settlement and expansion. But hey, every coin's got two sides. The Louisiana Purchase had some downsides, too, like how it trampled over Native American tribes, leaving them feeling mighty displaced and oppressed. So yeah, understanding this period is important. It's about wrapping our heads around the whole shebang, the good and the bad, and figuring out what lessons we can learn from it.
Or, in other words:
Between 1786 CE and 1803 CE, America experienced a pivotal period that left a mark on its history. It all began with the drafting and adoption of the United States Constitution in 1787, replacing those pesky Articles of Confederation. This Constitution set the stage for the federal government and laid out the rights and responsibilities of us citizens. But it wasn't all smooth sailing. There were folks who had concerns about giving too much power to the big boys in the central government. To address those worries, they tacked on the Bill of Rights to the Constitution just to make sure individual liberties were protected.
Then, in 1803, something big happened: the Louisiana Purchase. It was like America got a growth spurt, doubling in size and opening up new horizons for settlement and expansion. But hey, every coin's got two sides. The Louisiana Purchase had some downsides, too, like how it trampled over Native American tribes, leaving them feeling mighty displaced and oppressed. So yeah, understanding this period is important. It's about wrapping our heads around the whole shebang, the good and the bad, and figuring out what lessons we can learn from it.
Or, in other words:
- From 1786 to 1803, important things happened in American history.
- The United States Constitution was written in 1787, replacing the Articles of Confederation.
- The Constitution made a plan for the government and told people their rights and duties.
- Some people were worried that the government would have too much power, so they added the Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms.
- In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase made America much bigger, with more land for people to settle and explore.
- However, the Louisiana Purchase also caused problems for Native American tribes who were forced out of their homes.
- Learning about this time is important because it helps us understand the complexities of American history, both the good and the bad parts.
ASSIGNMENTS
Forum Discussion #7
Hamilton: An American Musical, a captivating production that combines singing and rap, delves into the life of Alexander Hamilton, an influential figure in the early days of America. The musical, created by the talented Lin-Manuel Miranda, features an exceptional blend of hip-hop, R&B, pop, soul, and traditional show tunes and incorporates color-conscious casting, employing non-white actors to portray Founding Fathers and other historical personalities. This innovative approach garnered widespread praise from critics and audiences, resulting in tremendous success at the box office.
Listen to these dope rhymes and answer the following question:
- Forum Discussion #7
- QUIZ #2
Forum Discussion #7
Hamilton: An American Musical, a captivating production that combines singing and rap, delves into the life of Alexander Hamilton, an influential figure in the early days of America. The musical, created by the talented Lin-Manuel Miranda, features an exceptional blend of hip-hop, R&B, pop, soul, and traditional show tunes and incorporates color-conscious casting, employing non-white actors to portray Founding Fathers and other historical personalities. This innovative approach garnered widespread praise from critics and audiences, resulting in tremendous success at the box office.
Listen to these dope rhymes and answer the following question:
Has "Hamilton" excessively glorified the man himself, magnifying his opposition to slavery while downplaying less favorable aspects of his political beliefs? This topic has sparked scholarly debates, with historians, even those who adore the musical and appreciate its diverse cast, pondering whether "Hamilton" truly captures the essence of Alexander Hamilton.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
The song starts with Hamilton introducing himself and his relentless hunger for greatness. He's a man who won't let his shot slip away like a fool. He's got fire in his belly, and he'll be damned if he doesn't leave his mark on this sorry world. Hamilton has known struggle. He's a man who's crawled through the darkest depths of life. But he is not taking it lying down. He's got brains, passion, and the balls to rise above it all. No, he won't be silenced. He'll be heard. He's got dreams of shaping America's future, fighting for freedom, and tearing down the walls of inequality. He aims to change the world, one punch at a time.
Hamilton does not just talk. He's got the grit to back it up. He's willing to take risks, grab opportunities by the throat, and pummel them into submission. He's got that fire in his eyes, that unwavering belief that he can conquer anything that stands in his godforsaken path. Hamilton is not satisfied with mediocrity. He's ready to defy expectations, surpass every goddamn obstacle in his way, and leave his adversaries whimpering in the dirt. He'll outwork them, outsmart them, and make them eat humble pie. This guy's got an insatiable hunger for triumph, and he won't stop until he's drenched in the blood of victory.
But let's remember that the path to glory isn't a cakewalk. But he's unfazed. He's ready to take it all, the good, the bad, and the insane. He'll stare adversity in the face and give it a mighty middle finger. So "My Shot" is a battle cry, an anthem for all you restless souls out there. It's about taking chances, raising hell, and carving your name in history. Hamilton's here to remind us that life's a rollercoaster, and it's up to us to grab that handle and ride it like a wild beast.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
The song starts with Hamilton introducing himself and his relentless hunger for greatness. He's a man who won't let his shot slip away like a fool. He's got fire in his belly, and he'll be damned if he doesn't leave his mark on this sorry world. Hamilton has known struggle. He's a man who's crawled through the darkest depths of life. But he is not taking it lying down. He's got brains, passion, and the balls to rise above it all. No, he won't be silenced. He'll be heard. He's got dreams of shaping America's future, fighting for freedom, and tearing down the walls of inequality. He aims to change the world, one punch at a time.
Hamilton does not just talk. He's got the grit to back it up. He's willing to take risks, grab opportunities by the throat, and pummel them into submission. He's got that fire in his eyes, that unwavering belief that he can conquer anything that stands in his godforsaken path. Hamilton is not satisfied with mediocrity. He's ready to defy expectations, surpass every goddamn obstacle in his way, and leave his adversaries whimpering in the dirt. He'll outwork them, outsmart them, and make them eat humble pie. This guy's got an insatiable hunger for triumph, and he won't stop until he's drenched in the blood of victory.
But let's remember that the path to glory isn't a cakewalk. But he's unfazed. He's ready to take it all, the good, the bad, and the insane. He'll stare adversity in the face and give it a mighty middle finger. So "My Shot" is a battle cry, an anthem for all you restless souls out there. It's about taking chances, raising hell, and carving your name in history. Hamilton's here to remind us that life's a rollercoaster, and it's up to us to grab that handle and ride it like a wild beast.
Hey, welcome to the work cited section! Here's where you'll find all the heavy hitters that inspired the content you've just consumed. Some might think citations are as dull as unbuttered toast, but nothing gets my intellectual juices flowing like a good reference list. Don't get me wrong, just because we've cited a source; doesn't mean we're always going to see eye-to-eye. But that's the beauty of it - it's up to you to chew on the material and come to conclusions. Listen, we've gone to great lengths to ensure these citations are accurate, but let's face it, we're all human. So, give us a holler if you notice any mistakes or suggest more sources. We're always looking to up our game. Ultimately, it's all about pursuing knowledge and truth.
Work Cited:
Work Cited:
- Ellis, Joseph J. Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. Vintage, 2000.
- Ferling, John. A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic. Oxford University Press, 2003.
- Horsman, Reginald. The Louisiana Purchase: A Historical and Geographical Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, 2002.
- Kennedy, David M., et al. The American Spirit: United States History as Seen by Contemporaries. Vol. 1, Cengage Learning, 2016.
- McCullough, David. John Adams. Simon & Schuster, 2001.
- Novak, William J. The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. University of North Carolina Press, 1996.
- Schlesinger Jr., Arthur M. The Age of Jackson. Back Bay Books, 1953.
- Silbey, Joel H. A Respectable Minority: The Democratic Party in the Civil War Era, 1860-1868. W. W. Norton & Company, 1977.
- Taylor, Alan. American Colonies: The Settling of North America. Penguin Books, 2002.
LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Disclaimer: This learning module was primarily created by the professor with the assistance of AI technology. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, please note that the AI's contribution was limited to some regions of the module. The professor takes full responsibility for the content of this module and any errors or omissions therein. This module is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice or consultation. The professor and AI cannot be held responsible for any consequences arising from using this module.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.