HST 201 Module #14
Module Fourteen: Stay Together for the Kids (1863 CE - 1870 CE)
From 1863 CE to 1870, the United States experienced numerous significant events beyond the Civil War that shaped its history. These events included the Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Reconstruction, and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan. These events had a profound impact on American society, politics, and race relations, and continue to influence the country to this day.
One of the most critical events during this period was the Emancipation Proclamation. In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Proclamation, which declared that all enslaved individuals in the Confederate states would be set free. Although the Proclamation did not end slavery entirely, it paved the way for the eventual abolition of slavery with the passage of the 13th Amendment. The Emancipation Proclamation was a turning point in American history, signaling the beginning of the end of slavery and the struggle for racial equality.
The passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution was another significant event during this period. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, the 14th Amendment granted citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the United States, and the 15th Amendment guaranteed the right to vote regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. These amendments were crucial in the struggle for civil rights and equality, as they provided legal protections to formerly enslaved individuals and other marginalized groups.
Despite these legal protections, Reconstruction was a difficult period for African Americans in the United States. The Reconstruction era saw the rise of the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization that terrorized African Americans and other minorities. The Klan's violent tactics included lynching, arson, and intimidation, and their presence was felt throughout the country. The Klan's influence, along with other forms of discrimination and racism, persisted long after Reconstruction ended, and continue to impact American society today.
The events of this period are essential to study today because they provide a historical context for understanding current issues of race and civil rights in the United States. The struggle for equality and justice is ongoing, and the events of this period show that progress has been made, but there is still much work to be done. Studying this history can help us understand the challenges that people faced in the past and inform our efforts to create a more just and equitable society.
In conclusion, the events of 1863-1870 were crucial in shaping American history beyond the Civil War. The Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Reconstruction, and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan all had significant impacts on American society, politics, and race relations. These events continue to influence American society today and studying them is crucial to understanding the ongoing struggle for equality and justice in the United States.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
From 1863 CE to 1870, the United States experienced numerous significant events beyond the Civil War that shaped its history. These events included the Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Reconstruction, and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan. These events had a profound impact on American society, politics, and race relations, and continue to influence the country to this day.
One of the most critical events during this period was the Emancipation Proclamation. In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Proclamation, which declared that all enslaved individuals in the Confederate states would be set free. Although the Proclamation did not end slavery entirely, it paved the way for the eventual abolition of slavery with the passage of the 13th Amendment. The Emancipation Proclamation was a turning point in American history, signaling the beginning of the end of slavery and the struggle for racial equality.
The passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution was another significant event during this period. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, the 14th Amendment granted citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the United States, and the 15th Amendment guaranteed the right to vote regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. These amendments were crucial in the struggle for civil rights and equality, as they provided legal protections to formerly enslaved individuals and other marginalized groups.
Despite these legal protections, Reconstruction was a difficult period for African Americans in the United States. The Reconstruction era saw the rise of the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization that terrorized African Americans and other minorities. The Klan's violent tactics included lynching, arson, and intimidation, and their presence was felt throughout the country. The Klan's influence, along with other forms of discrimination and racism, persisted long after Reconstruction ended, and continue to impact American society today.
The events of this period are essential to study today because they provide a historical context for understanding current issues of race and civil rights in the United States. The struggle for equality and justice is ongoing, and the events of this period show that progress has been made, but there is still much work to be done. Studying this history can help us understand the challenges that people faced in the past and inform our efforts to create a more just and equitable society.
In conclusion, the events of 1863-1870 were crucial in shaping American history beyond the Civil War. The Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Reconstruction, and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan all had significant impacts on American society, politics, and race relations. These events continue to influence American society today and studying them is crucial to understanding the ongoing struggle for equality and justice in the United States.
THE RUNDOWN
- From 1863 to 1870, significant events occurred in the United States beyond the Civil War.
- These events included the Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Reconstruction, and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan.
- The Emancipation Proclamation declared that all enslaved individuals in the Confederate states would be set free.
- The 13th Amendment abolished slavery, the 14th Amendment granted citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the United States, and the 15th Amendment guaranteed the right to vote regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
- Reconstruction was a difficult period for African Americans in the United States, marked by the rise of the Ku Klux Klan and other forms of discrimination and racism.
- The events of this period are crucial to study today because they provide a historical context for understanding current issues of race and civil rights in the United States.
QUESTIONS
- How did the rise of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist groups impact the struggle for civil rights in the United States, and what strategies were used to combat their influence?
- In what ways did Reconstruction transform American society and politics, and what lessons can we learn from this period in American history?
- How do the events of 1863-1870 relate to ongoing struggles for racial justice and equality in the United States, and what steps can be taken to address these issues today?
#14: Expertise Is Not Real
The next rule of history: "expertise," as we understand it is mainly fake. In academia, there's a saying that instead of measuring what we value, we value what we can measure. Researchers can manipulate numbers and facts to support any hypothesis or be a stronghold for confirmation bias. But history academics also rely on non-statistical data, meaning you read history and try to get some lessons. And historical specialization can cause an issue within academic learning.
Specialization sounds good and is ultimately rooted in a desire for a more egalitarian intellectual culture. In this way of thinking, a PhD is just as much of a "doctor" as a Noble Prize-winning physicist and has much more credibility in any field. Not everyone can engage in careful analysis of data in a way that can withstand scrutiny, but lower the standards enough and create enough areas, and a lot of people can be experts. Since people aren't getting more competent, more experts mean that the average intelligence of those influencing public policy drops. Part of the reason that specialization is terrible is that people have to justify the field's existence. Some historians have some terrible takes because they need to be original to get published.
Don't tune into the History channel and expect to find much-involving history. Historical thought has given up its death rattle and has been replaced by reality shows. And this happens because of how the world works. There are two kinds of people – those who don't care about past events and who soak it in. You can guess which sample size would be more prominent. An alternative now is video platforms like YouTube. As a form of social media, YouTube has moved beyond vapid videos of cute animals to something where historians can discuss every topic under the sun. This ubiquitous social media allows those interested in history to find an audience, which is a good thing.
Nonetheless, this emerging trend has a drawback: anyone with a camera can hit record and share their knowledge. Although many history videos on YouTube are visually appealing, their information is often superficial. Instead of thoroughly researched documentaries with multiple sources, viewers are presented with polished lectures that reflect one person's interpretation of past events or historical items. These individuals rarely disclose their research methods or how they arrived at their conclusions, resulting in inaccurate or biased information. The proliferation of false information on the platform has enabled conspiracy theorists and other purveyors of dubious narratives to propagate their ideas. Consequently, almost anyone can present themselves as an authoritative source of knowledge. These video narrators speak to the camera with an air of supreme expertise on the subject matter.
Throughout history, readers have had to scrutinize the quality of research. In the past, this has been accomplished by perusing footnotes and bibliographies. Readers could always verify a writer's sources to assess the accuracy or authenticity of the printed material, unlike today, where it is predominantly misleading.
History has been a fancy-pants part of academics for centuries. Those who call themselves historians, with their big brains and fancy degrees, are supposed to be the top dogs when understanding the past. Their fancy interpretations shape the way we see history as a whole. But some eggheads reckon that all this expertise stuff is just a bunch of nonsense, especially when it comes to history. They say that the nature of digging up old stuff, with all its biases and different points of view, makes it impossible to claim the absolute truth about what happened back in the day. Let's look at that argument and what it means for studying history today.
We need to have a reality check about history - it's got its flaws, just like any other discipline. The past is a murky, mysterious beast we can never fully grasp. Historians can only do their best to piece it together using limited sources. And even then, the accounts they come up with are influenced by the political, social, and cultural contexts in which they were written. These factors can twist and turn the facts until they're barely recognizable. The result? A narrative that serves the interests and biases of the historian who wrote it. That means historical interpretations are far from absolute truths. They reflect the historian's perspective and how they interpret the available evidence.
So, if you want to understand the past truly, you've got to be aware of the limitations of history. Otherwise, you may be getting a skewed version of the story.
If you delve into the annals of history, you'll find an intriguing case study on how our interpretations of past events can be shaped by our current times. It's the tale of Christopher Columbus, a once-revered figure in the Western world who was believed to have "discovered" America and ushered in a new era of enlightenment. But as the years went by, a different version of the story emerged that challenged conventional wisdom and exposed the darker side of Columbus's arrival.
The modern-day scholarship on Columbus is a fascinating exercise in cultural reevaluation. On the one hand, you have the traditional narrative, which portrays Columbus as a visionary explorer who brought the light of civilization to a savage land. On the other hand, you have a more nuanced perspective that acknowledges the profound violence and oppression that accompanied Columbus's expedition. This alternative view highlights the atrocities committed against the indigenous peoples of the Americas, including their enslavement and genocide.
What's intriguing about this revisionist take on Columbus is that it reflects our own time's shifting values and interests. We recognize that our understanding of the past is always subject to revision and that the stories we tell about our forebears are not set in stone. As we grapple with social justice issues and reckon with the legacies of colonialism, we are increasingly inclined to view historical figures like Columbus through a more critical lens.
The story of Columbus is a potent reminder of how contemporary concerns can shape historical interpretation. It prompts us to question our assumptions and challenge conventional wisdom, and it underscores the vital importance of ongoing dialogue and debate about our shared past. Ultimately, the story of Columbus reminds us that history is not a fixed entity but a living, breathing thing constantly evolving and adapting to the world around us.
You see, historical knowledge is like a compass guiding us through the complex issues of our time. By understanding the past, we gain insight into the present and can navigate the treacherous waters of our society with greater ease. Take conflicts, for example. By studying history, we can uncover the root causes of these disputes and find ways to resolve them.
But history isn't just about conflict, my friends. It's about learning from the successes and failures of the past and using that knowledge to shape a better future. Public policy, for instance, can be informed by historical precedent. By examining past initiatives, we can determine what works and doesn't and create genuinely effective policies.
And let's remember the diversity of human experience. History shows us countless ways of living and being in this world, and it challenges us to question our assumptions and prejudices. We can build a more inclusive and compassionate society by appreciating the richness and complexity of our shared history. This is the dilemma, then. "Trust the experts" can lead the public astray, and so does "don't trust the experts." While that's an issue for most people, for intellectuals, the problem is more soluble. When you don't have the time to research something for yourself, you should trust those who have good intellectual habits.
THE RUNDOWN
THE STATE OF THE UNION
The next rule of history: "expertise," as we understand it is mainly fake. In academia, there's a saying that instead of measuring what we value, we value what we can measure. Researchers can manipulate numbers and facts to support any hypothesis or be a stronghold for confirmation bias. But history academics also rely on non-statistical data, meaning you read history and try to get some lessons. And historical specialization can cause an issue within academic learning.
Specialization sounds good and is ultimately rooted in a desire for a more egalitarian intellectual culture. In this way of thinking, a PhD is just as much of a "doctor" as a Noble Prize-winning physicist and has much more credibility in any field. Not everyone can engage in careful analysis of data in a way that can withstand scrutiny, but lower the standards enough and create enough areas, and a lot of people can be experts. Since people aren't getting more competent, more experts mean that the average intelligence of those influencing public policy drops. Part of the reason that specialization is terrible is that people have to justify the field's existence. Some historians have some terrible takes because they need to be original to get published.
Don't tune into the History channel and expect to find much-involving history. Historical thought has given up its death rattle and has been replaced by reality shows. And this happens because of how the world works. There are two kinds of people – those who don't care about past events and who soak it in. You can guess which sample size would be more prominent. An alternative now is video platforms like YouTube. As a form of social media, YouTube has moved beyond vapid videos of cute animals to something where historians can discuss every topic under the sun. This ubiquitous social media allows those interested in history to find an audience, which is a good thing.
Nonetheless, this emerging trend has a drawback: anyone with a camera can hit record and share their knowledge. Although many history videos on YouTube are visually appealing, their information is often superficial. Instead of thoroughly researched documentaries with multiple sources, viewers are presented with polished lectures that reflect one person's interpretation of past events or historical items. These individuals rarely disclose their research methods or how they arrived at their conclusions, resulting in inaccurate or biased information. The proliferation of false information on the platform has enabled conspiracy theorists and other purveyors of dubious narratives to propagate their ideas. Consequently, almost anyone can present themselves as an authoritative source of knowledge. These video narrators speak to the camera with an air of supreme expertise on the subject matter.
Throughout history, readers have had to scrutinize the quality of research. In the past, this has been accomplished by perusing footnotes and bibliographies. Readers could always verify a writer's sources to assess the accuracy or authenticity of the printed material, unlike today, where it is predominantly misleading.
History has been a fancy-pants part of academics for centuries. Those who call themselves historians, with their big brains and fancy degrees, are supposed to be the top dogs when understanding the past. Their fancy interpretations shape the way we see history as a whole. But some eggheads reckon that all this expertise stuff is just a bunch of nonsense, especially when it comes to history. They say that the nature of digging up old stuff, with all its biases and different points of view, makes it impossible to claim the absolute truth about what happened back in the day. Let's look at that argument and what it means for studying history today.
We need to have a reality check about history - it's got its flaws, just like any other discipline. The past is a murky, mysterious beast we can never fully grasp. Historians can only do their best to piece it together using limited sources. And even then, the accounts they come up with are influenced by the political, social, and cultural contexts in which they were written. These factors can twist and turn the facts until they're barely recognizable. The result? A narrative that serves the interests and biases of the historian who wrote it. That means historical interpretations are far from absolute truths. They reflect the historian's perspective and how they interpret the available evidence.
So, if you want to understand the past truly, you've got to be aware of the limitations of history. Otherwise, you may be getting a skewed version of the story.
If you delve into the annals of history, you'll find an intriguing case study on how our interpretations of past events can be shaped by our current times. It's the tale of Christopher Columbus, a once-revered figure in the Western world who was believed to have "discovered" America and ushered in a new era of enlightenment. But as the years went by, a different version of the story emerged that challenged conventional wisdom and exposed the darker side of Columbus's arrival.
The modern-day scholarship on Columbus is a fascinating exercise in cultural reevaluation. On the one hand, you have the traditional narrative, which portrays Columbus as a visionary explorer who brought the light of civilization to a savage land. On the other hand, you have a more nuanced perspective that acknowledges the profound violence and oppression that accompanied Columbus's expedition. This alternative view highlights the atrocities committed against the indigenous peoples of the Americas, including their enslavement and genocide.
What's intriguing about this revisionist take on Columbus is that it reflects our own time's shifting values and interests. We recognize that our understanding of the past is always subject to revision and that the stories we tell about our forebears are not set in stone. As we grapple with social justice issues and reckon with the legacies of colonialism, we are increasingly inclined to view historical figures like Columbus through a more critical lens.
The story of Columbus is a potent reminder of how contemporary concerns can shape historical interpretation. It prompts us to question our assumptions and challenge conventional wisdom, and it underscores the vital importance of ongoing dialogue and debate about our shared past. Ultimately, the story of Columbus reminds us that history is not a fixed entity but a living, breathing thing constantly evolving and adapting to the world around us.
You see, historical knowledge is like a compass guiding us through the complex issues of our time. By understanding the past, we gain insight into the present and can navigate the treacherous waters of our society with greater ease. Take conflicts, for example. By studying history, we can uncover the root causes of these disputes and find ways to resolve them.
But history isn't just about conflict, my friends. It's about learning from the successes and failures of the past and using that knowledge to shape a better future. Public policy, for instance, can be informed by historical precedent. By examining past initiatives, we can determine what works and doesn't and create genuinely effective policies.
And let's remember the diversity of human experience. History shows us countless ways of living and being in this world, and it challenges us to question our assumptions and prejudices. We can build a more inclusive and compassionate society by appreciating the richness and complexity of our shared history. This is the dilemma, then. "Trust the experts" can lead the public astray, and so does "don't trust the experts." While that's an issue for most people, for intellectuals, the problem is more soluble. When you don't have the time to research something for yourself, you should trust those who have good intellectual habits.
THE RUNDOWN
- Historians can manipulate data and have confirmation bias.
- Being a specialist in history can sometimes mean you're competent in data analysis.
- Reality shows have replaced the history channel, but YouTube has historians sharing information.
- Anyone can make history videos on YouTube, but the information can be inaccurate or biased.
- Historians try to piece together the past, but various contexts can twist it.
- Historical interpretations reflect the historian's perspective and available evidence.
- Christopher Columbus's tale shows how current values can shape our interpretations of past events.
THE STATE OF THE UNION
February 23, 1870 - Mississippi was readmitted to Congress.
HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
We've got some fine classroom lectures coming your way, all courtesy of the RPTM podcast. These lectures will take you on a wild ride through history, exploring everything from ancient civilizations and epic battles to scientific breakthroughs and artistic revolutions. The podcast will guide you through each lecture with its no-nonsense, straight-talking style, using various sources to give you the lowdown on each topic. You won't find any fancy-pants jargon or convoluted theories here, just plain and straightforward explanations anyone can understand. So sit back and prepare to soak up some knowledge.
LECTURES
LECTURES
READING
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Carnes, Mark C., and John A. Garraty. American Destiny: Narrative of a Nation. 4th ed. Vol. 1.: Pearson, 2011.
Mark C. Carnes and John A. Garraty are respected historians who have made notable contributions to American history. First, we've got Carnes - this guy's a real maverick when it comes to studying the good ol' US of A. He's all about the secret societies that helped shape our culture in the 1800s. You know, the ones that operated behind closed doors had their fingers in all sorts of pies. Carnes is the man who can unravel those mysteries and give us a glimpse into the underbelly of American culture. We've also got Garraty in the mix. This guy's no slouch either - he's known for taking a big-picture view of American history and bringing it to life with his engaging writing style. Whether profiling famous figures from our past or digging deep into a particular aspect of our nation's history, Garraty always keeps it accurate and accessible. You don't need a Ph.D. to understand what he's saying, and that's why he's a true heavyweight in the field.
- Carnes Chapter 16 "Reconstruction and the South"
This class utilizes the following textbook:
Carnes, Mark C., and John A. Garraty. American Destiny: Narrative of a Nation. 4th ed. Vol. 1.: Pearson, 2011.
Mark C. Carnes and John A. Garraty are respected historians who have made notable contributions to American history. First, we've got Carnes - this guy's a real maverick when it comes to studying the good ol' US of A. He's all about the secret societies that helped shape our culture in the 1800s. You know, the ones that operated behind closed doors had their fingers in all sorts of pies. Carnes is the man who can unravel those mysteries and give us a glimpse into the underbelly of American culture. We've also got Garraty in the mix. This guy's no slouch either - he's known for taking a big-picture view of American history and bringing it to life with his engaging writing style. Whether profiling famous figures from our past or digging deep into a particular aspect of our nation's history, Garraty always keeps it accurate and accessible. You don't need a Ph.D. to understand what he's saying, and that's why he's a true heavyweight in the field.
Howard Zinn was a historian, writer, and political activist known for his critical analysis of American history. He is particularly well-known for his counter-narrative to traditional American history accounts and highlights marginalized groups' experiences and perspectives. Zinn's work is often associated with social history and is known for his Marxist and socialist views. Larry Schweikart is also a historian, but his work and perspective are often considered more conservative. Schweikart's work is often associated with military history, and he is known for his support of free-market economics and limited government. Overall, Zinn and Schweikart have different perspectives on various historical issues and events and may interpret historical events and phenomena differently. Occasionally, we will also look at Thaddeus Russell, a historian, author, and academic. Russell has written extensively on the history of social and cultural change, and his work focuses on how marginalized and oppressed groups have challenged and transformed mainstream culture. Russell is known for his unconventional and controversial ideas, and his work has been praised for its originality and provocative nature.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
My classes utilize both Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States and Larry Schweikart's Patriot's History of the United States, mostly in excerpts posted to the modules. You can access the full text of People's History or Patriot's History by clicking on the links.
Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"... With billions of dollars' worth of slaves gone, the wealth of the old South was wiped out. They now looked to the national government for help: credit, subsidies, flood control projects. The United States in 1865 had spent $103,294,501 on public works, but the South received only
$9,469,363. For instance, while Ohio got over a million dollars, Kentucky, her neighbor south of the river, got $25,000. While Maine got $3 million, Mississippi got $136,000. While $83 million had been given to subsidize the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads, thus creating a transcontinental railroad through the North, there was no such subsidy for the South. So one of the things the South looked for was federal aid to the Texas and Pacific Railroad..."
"... With billions of dollars' worth of slaves gone, the wealth of the old South was wiped out. They now looked to the national government for help: credit, subsidies, flood control projects. The United States in 1865 had spent $103,294,501 on public works, but the South received only
$9,469,363. For instance, while Ohio got over a million dollars, Kentucky, her neighbor south of the river, got $25,000. While Maine got $3 million, Mississippi got $136,000. While $83 million had been given to subsidize the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads, thus creating a transcontinental railroad through the North, there was no such subsidy for the South. So one of the things the South looked for was federal aid to the Texas and Pacific Railroad..."
Larry Schweikart, A Patriot's History of the United States
"... Despite smarting from the stiff resistance engendered by Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Southerners in 1854 could claim victory. Despite several near riots over the Fugitive Slave Act, it remained the law of the land, and Stowe’s book could not change that. Meanwhile, the South was about to receive a major windfall. An innocuous proposal to build a transcontinental railroad commanded little sectional interest. In fact, it promised to open vast new territory to slavery and accelerate the momentum toward war.
Since the 1840s, dreamers imagined railroads that would connect California with states east of the Mississippi. Asa Whitney, a New York merchant who produced one of the first of the transcontinental plans in 1844, argued for a privately constructed railroad whose expenses were offset by grants of public lands. By 1852 the idea had attracted Stephen Douglas, the Illinois Democrat senator with presidential aspirations, who rightly saw that the transcontinental would make Chicago the trade hub of the entire middle United States. With little controversy the congressional delegations from Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois introduced a bill to organize a Nebraska Territory, the northern part of the old Louisiana Purchase, and, once again, illegally erase Indian claims to lands there..."
"... Despite smarting from the stiff resistance engendered by Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Southerners in 1854 could claim victory. Despite several near riots over the Fugitive Slave Act, it remained the law of the land, and Stowe’s book could not change that. Meanwhile, the South was about to receive a major windfall. An innocuous proposal to build a transcontinental railroad commanded little sectional interest. In fact, it promised to open vast new territory to slavery and accelerate the momentum toward war.
Since the 1840s, dreamers imagined railroads that would connect California with states east of the Mississippi. Asa Whitney, a New York merchant who produced one of the first of the transcontinental plans in 1844, argued for a privately constructed railroad whose expenses were offset by grants of public lands. By 1852 the idea had attracted Stephen Douglas, the Illinois Democrat senator with presidential aspirations, who rightly saw that the transcontinental would make Chicago the trade hub of the entire middle United States. With little controversy the congressional delegations from Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois introduced a bill to organize a Nebraska Territory, the northern part of the old Louisiana Purchase, and, once again, illegally erase Indian claims to lands there..."
Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of the United States
"... Between 1270 and 1900, the number of farms in the United States doubled, and mere land was brought under cultivation than in the previous tus and half centuries. Most of this newly cultivated land was in the Great Plains and the Southwest. In addition to this farming, other industries developed rapidly in the West during the second half of the nineteenth century. The largest of these were metal and coal mining in California, the Rockies, and parts of the Southwest; cattle ranching on the Plains; lumber in the Pacific Northwest; large-scale fruit and vegetable agriculture in the inland valleys of California; and oil in Texas, Oklahoma, and Southern California. Railroads connected these industries to one another and to eastern U.S. and European markets, which crisscrossed the West by the end of the nineteenth century. The federal government contributed To this explosive growth with massive expenditures for the building of the Transcontinental Railroad, which ran from the Pacific Ocean To the Missouri River, but also to the construction of roads, dams, and vast irrigation systems without which the West as we know it could never have been created..."
"... Between 1270 and 1900, the number of farms in the United States doubled, and mere land was brought under cultivation than in the previous tus and half centuries. Most of this newly cultivated land was in the Great Plains and the Southwest. In addition to this farming, other industries developed rapidly in the West during the second half of the nineteenth century. The largest of these were metal and coal mining in California, the Rockies, and parts of the Southwest; cattle ranching on the Plains; lumber in the Pacific Northwest; large-scale fruit and vegetable agriculture in the inland valleys of California; and oil in Texas, Oklahoma, and Southern California. Railroads connected these industries to one another and to eastern U.S. and European markets, which crisscrossed the West by the end of the nineteenth century. The federal government contributed To this explosive growth with massive expenditures for the building of the Transcontinental Railroad, which ran from the Pacific Ocean To the Missouri River, but also to the construction of roads, dams, and vast irrigation systems without which the West as we know it could never have been created..."
The post-Civil War era in the United States was like a bucking bronco riding straight into a whirlwind of economic chaos, especially down South and out West. The end of slavery hit the South like a ton of bricks, leaving them poorer than a church mouse and begging Uncle Sam for a handout to get back on their feet. Meanwhile, out West, it was a whole different story. The government was throwin' cash around like a drunken sailor, investing left and right in fancy infrastructure projects like the giant Transcontinental Railroad. I want to dive deep into the guts of this wild economic transformation in American history and explain why it's damn important to study this stuff today. By digging into the ups and downs of the past, we can get a good look at how these crazy events shaped our future. And trust me, my friend, the impact is still kicking today.
When slavery went down the drain, the South's pockets were emptied faster than a glass of whiskey in Bukowski's hand. Billions of dollars worth of enslaved labor vanished. Desperate for a lifeline, they reached out to the national government, begging for financial aid like a stray dog looking for scraps. Uncle Sam's generosity was as scarce. While the rest of the country reveled in over a hundred million bucks for public works, the South got a little slice of that pie, with Kentucky and Mississippi feeling the sting of neglect. And at the heart of their plea for help was the grand dream of building the Texas and Pacific Railroad, a glimmer of hope in a land scorched by the flames of lost fortunes.
The South hankered for Uncle Sam's pocketbook. They hollered about economic reconstruction, begging for a slice of that federal aid pie. They had a point. There were these pesky regional disparities, like a hound dog with a limp, gnawing at the nation's fabric. Considering it was high time to do something about it, folks started throwing around ideas like a hoedown on a hot summer night. They devised grand schemes to get the South back on its feet, fixing its financial mess like a DIY project gone haywire. With a wave of Uncle Sam's mighty hand, the stage was set for the South's revival, ready to dance to a new economic tune.
Sadly, Uncle Sam's support, or lack thereof, didn't lend a helping hand to these folks after the Civil War. The South's economy hit, and the social fabric frayed at the seams. Economic inequality thrived like kudzu, strangling any hopes of a swift recovery. The repercussions were as enduring as a perfectly aged bourbon.
While the South was busy picking up the pieces after the Civil War, the Wild West was having a rough time riding the waves of a sensational economic boom. With all its grandeur and resources, the federal government played a vital role in this Western extravaganza. They put their money where their mouth was and invested heavily in infrastructure development. Cue the entrance of the Transcontinental Railroad, the big daddy of projects during that era. This bad boy connected the Pacific Ocean to the mighty Missouri River, unlocking Pandora's box of possibilities. Suddenly, transportation and trade were as smooth as a tumbleweed rolling down the deserted streets, and the vast territories of the West were wide open for settlers, resource hunters, and farmers alike. It was like America's jackpot, and Uncle Sam knew how to cash in.
In the swirling vortex of government intervention, the monstrous beast of infrastructure investment was unleashed upon the untamed West. With the thunderous roar of the Transcontinental Railroad, the land shook and quivered, birthing a frenzied dance of industrialization, urbanization, and agricultural frenzy. The iron veins of the railroads bridged the chasm between the wild frontier and the distant realms of the East and Europe, binding together economies in a rugged, intoxicating dance of commerce. From the depths of this chaotic maelstrom emerged the giants of mining, cattle ranching, lumber, agriculture, and oil extraction, their insatiable hunger devouring the Earth's riches. It was a time of uncontrolled growth, untamed dreams, and unimaginable possibilities as the West rode the furious wave of progress, with the government holding the reins in one hand and a shot of whiskey in the other.
The West was a wild beast unleashed, wreaking havoc and leaving a trail of misfortune in its wake. Railroads, the bloodlines of progress, forged with the bones of the indigenous, their ancestral lands trampled beneath the iron wheels of so-called civilization. Native American tribes were robbed of their roots and thrown into the cold embrace of displacement and marginalization. Its bountiful resources, once a gift from Mother Nature's hand, are now ruthlessly pillaged, the Earth weeping as trees fell and soil eroded, its once-pristine breath now choked by the suffocating grip of pollution. Progress, they call it. The West is a beautiful tragedy where ambition and conquest dance hand in hand, leaving scars upon both land and soul.
By examining the economic metamorphosis of post-Civil War America, we embark upon an enlightening journey through the intricate tapestry of history, where the South and the West perform a captivating dance of contrasting fortunes. These narratives lie invaluable lessons that cast a penetrating beam of understanding on present-day predicaments as we grapple with the ever-persistent quandaries of economic inequality, regional progress, and the thorny implications of ambitious infrastructure endeavors.
THE RUNDOWN
QUESTIONS
When slavery went down the drain, the South's pockets were emptied faster than a glass of whiskey in Bukowski's hand. Billions of dollars worth of enslaved labor vanished. Desperate for a lifeline, they reached out to the national government, begging for financial aid like a stray dog looking for scraps. Uncle Sam's generosity was as scarce. While the rest of the country reveled in over a hundred million bucks for public works, the South got a little slice of that pie, with Kentucky and Mississippi feeling the sting of neglect. And at the heart of their plea for help was the grand dream of building the Texas and Pacific Railroad, a glimmer of hope in a land scorched by the flames of lost fortunes.
The South hankered for Uncle Sam's pocketbook. They hollered about economic reconstruction, begging for a slice of that federal aid pie. They had a point. There were these pesky regional disparities, like a hound dog with a limp, gnawing at the nation's fabric. Considering it was high time to do something about it, folks started throwing around ideas like a hoedown on a hot summer night. They devised grand schemes to get the South back on its feet, fixing its financial mess like a DIY project gone haywire. With a wave of Uncle Sam's mighty hand, the stage was set for the South's revival, ready to dance to a new economic tune.
Sadly, Uncle Sam's support, or lack thereof, didn't lend a helping hand to these folks after the Civil War. The South's economy hit, and the social fabric frayed at the seams. Economic inequality thrived like kudzu, strangling any hopes of a swift recovery. The repercussions were as enduring as a perfectly aged bourbon.
While the South was busy picking up the pieces after the Civil War, the Wild West was having a rough time riding the waves of a sensational economic boom. With all its grandeur and resources, the federal government played a vital role in this Western extravaganza. They put their money where their mouth was and invested heavily in infrastructure development. Cue the entrance of the Transcontinental Railroad, the big daddy of projects during that era. This bad boy connected the Pacific Ocean to the mighty Missouri River, unlocking Pandora's box of possibilities. Suddenly, transportation and trade were as smooth as a tumbleweed rolling down the deserted streets, and the vast territories of the West were wide open for settlers, resource hunters, and farmers alike. It was like America's jackpot, and Uncle Sam knew how to cash in.
In the swirling vortex of government intervention, the monstrous beast of infrastructure investment was unleashed upon the untamed West. With the thunderous roar of the Transcontinental Railroad, the land shook and quivered, birthing a frenzied dance of industrialization, urbanization, and agricultural frenzy. The iron veins of the railroads bridged the chasm between the wild frontier and the distant realms of the East and Europe, binding together economies in a rugged, intoxicating dance of commerce. From the depths of this chaotic maelstrom emerged the giants of mining, cattle ranching, lumber, agriculture, and oil extraction, their insatiable hunger devouring the Earth's riches. It was a time of uncontrolled growth, untamed dreams, and unimaginable possibilities as the West rode the furious wave of progress, with the government holding the reins in one hand and a shot of whiskey in the other.
The West was a wild beast unleashed, wreaking havoc and leaving a trail of misfortune in its wake. Railroads, the bloodlines of progress, forged with the bones of the indigenous, their ancestral lands trampled beneath the iron wheels of so-called civilization. Native American tribes were robbed of their roots and thrown into the cold embrace of displacement and marginalization. Its bountiful resources, once a gift from Mother Nature's hand, are now ruthlessly pillaged, the Earth weeping as trees fell and soil eroded, its once-pristine breath now choked by the suffocating grip of pollution. Progress, they call it. The West is a beautiful tragedy where ambition and conquest dance hand in hand, leaving scars upon both land and soul.
By examining the economic metamorphosis of post-Civil War America, we embark upon an enlightening journey through the intricate tapestry of history, where the South and the West perform a captivating dance of contrasting fortunes. These narratives lie invaluable lessons that cast a penetrating beam of understanding on present-day predicaments as we grapple with the ever-persistent quandaries of economic inequality, regional progress, and the thorny implications of ambitious infrastructure endeavors.
THE RUNDOWN
- The post-Civil War era in the United States brought economic chaos, especially in the South and the West.
- The end of slavery hit the South hard, leaving them poor and needing financial help from the government.
- The government invested heavily in infrastructure projects, like the Transcontinental Railroad, in the West.
- The South sought financial aid from the government for economic reconstruction and to address regional disparities.
- Uncle Sam's support was limited, leading to economic inequality and a slow recovery in the South.
- The West experienced an economic boom with government investment in infrastructure, particularly the Transcontinental Railroad.
- The railroad connected the Pacific Ocean to the Missouri River, opening the West for settlers, resource hunters, and farmers.
- The West saw industrialization, urbanization, and agricultural expansion fueled by the railroad and government intervention.
- However, the West's progress came at the cost of indigenous peoples' displacement and environmental degradation.
- Studying this era helps us understand present-day issues like economic inequality, regional progress, and the impacts of ambitious infrastructure projects.
QUESTIONS
- What were the regional disparities in economic reconstruction after the Civil War, and why did they need to be addressed?
- Discuss the consequences of economic neglect and inequality in the South after the Civil War and their lasting impact on the region.
- How did the federal government's infrastructure development investment contribute to the Wild West economic boom?
The ceremony for the driving of the "Last Spike" at Promontory Summit, Utah, May 10, 1869
Prepare to be transported into the captivating realm of historical films and videos. Brace yourselves for a mind-bending odyssey through time as we embark on a cinematic expedition. Within these flickering frames, the past morphs into a vivid tapestry of triumphs, tragedies, and transformative moments that have shaped the very fabric of our existence. We shall immerse ourselves in a whirlwind of visual narratives, dissecting the nuances of artistic interpretations, examining the storytelling techniques, and voraciously devouring historical accuracy with the ferocity of a time-traveling historian. So strap in, hold tight, and prepare to have your perception of history forever shattered by the mesmerizing lens of the camera.
THE RUNDOWN
In the delightful chapter entitled "The Transcontinental Railroad Unites" from the epic saga "America: The Story of Us" Season 1, Episode 6, the tale unwraps the audacious venture that was the construction of the transcontinental railroad. Like a grand symphony, it begins with a dramatic flourish, reminding us of the sheer expanse of this great land and the dire need for a reliable transportation system that could stitch together the East and West coasts. Enter the railroad, our dashing hero, ready to reshape the nation's destiny. With great enthusiasm, the episode regales us with tales of courageous engineers, brave workers, and savvy entrepreneurs, all bravely defying nature's formidable challenges. They face treacherous landscapes, towering mountains, and cantankerous weather as if participating in a cosmic obstacle course. The immigrant workers, particularly the tenacious Chinese laborers, emerge as the unsung heroes of this grand narrative. They confront the physical hardships and the ugly face of racial discrimination yet rise above it all to bestow their invaluable contributions upon this monumental enterprise. As the railroad chugs along, like a colossal metal serpent devouring the earth, the episode reveals its profound impact on the nation's economy. It becomes the pulsating lifeline for transporting people, goods, and resources, sparking trade and economic growth. Like magic, new towns and cities sprout along its path, setting the stage for an era of industrialization. But hold on, dear audience, for this railroad carries more than goods and wealth. It brings the hopes and dreams of a nation, a social tapestry woven from diverse threads. People from far and wide come together, their hearts beating in unison, as the railroad becomes a unifying force, a conduit for the exchange of ideas, goods, and services, and a vibrant celebration of cultural diversity.
Welcome to the mind-bending Key Terms extravaganza of our history class learning module. Brace yourselves; we will unravel the cryptic codes, secret handshakes, and linguistic labyrinths that make up the twisted tapestry of historical knowledge. These key terms are the Rosetta Stones of our academic journey, the skeleton keys to unlocking the enigmatic doors of comprehension. They're like historical Swiss Army knives, equipped with blades of definition and corkscrews of contextual examples, ready to pierce through the fog of confusion and liberate your intellectual curiosity. By harnessing the power of these mighty key terms, you'll possess the superhuman ability to traverse the treacherous terrains of primary sources, surf the tumultuous waves of academic texts, and engage in epic battles of historical debate. The past awaits, and the key terms are keys to unlocking its dazzling secrets.
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
- Ten Percent Plan
- Detroit Race Riot
- Wade Davis Bill
- Sand Creek Massacre
- Chinese Workers
- Freedman's Bureau
- Lincoln Assassination
- Wild Bill Hickok
- Ku Klux Klan
- Civil Rights Act of 1866
- Black Codes
- Reconstruction Acts
- 14th Amendment
- The Treaty of Fort Laramie
- Transcontinental Railroad
- Wyoming and Suffrage
- National Women's Suffrage Association
- Black Friday
- The Knights of Labor
- First Football Game
- The 15th Amendment
- Force Acts
DISCLAIMER: Welcome scholars to the wild and wacky world of history class. This isn't your granddaddy's boring ol' lecture, baby. We will take a trip through time, which will be one wild ride. I know some of you are in a brick-and-mortar setting, while others are in the vast digital wasteland. But fear not; we're all in this together. Online students might miss out on some in-person interaction, but you can still join in on the fun. This little shindig aims to get you all engaged with the course material and understand how past societies have shaped the world we know today. We'll talk about revolutions, wars, and other crazy stuff. So get ready, kids, because it's going to be one heck of a trip. And for all, you online students out there, don't be shy. Please share your thoughts and ideas with the rest of us. The Professor will do his best to give everyone an equal opportunity to learn, so don't hold back. So, let's do this thing!
Activity: Reconstruction Simulation
Objective: To help students understand the challenges and opportunities faced by different groups during the Reconstruction era in the United States.
Instructions:
Simulation Rules:
Conducting the Simulation:
Debriefing:
Activity: Socratic Seminar on Post-Civil War Transformations
Activity: Reconstruction Simulation
Objective: To help students understand the challenges and opportunities faced by different groups during the Reconstruction era in the United States.
Instructions:
- Before the simulation, assign each student a specific role. If the class is large, you can have multiple students in each role. Make sure to provide them with a brief description of their assigned role, including their goals, challenges, and background information.
- Set up the classroom with desks or tables arranged in a way that allows for interaction and negotiation among the different roles.
- Explain the purpose of the simulation and the historical context of the Reconstruction era (1865-1877) to the students.
Simulation Rules:
- Establish ground rules for the simulation. Emphasize the importance of respectful communication and cooperation while engaging in negotiations.
- Explain that the simulation will consist of several rounds, each representing a significant event or challenge during the Reconstruction era.
Conducting the Simulation:
- Begin the simulation by introducing the first scenario or challenge. This could be a specific issue such as land distribution, voting rights, or labor conditions. Present the situation and its complexities to the class.
- Allow time for the students to discuss and negotiate with one another, representing the interests and concerns of their assigned roles.
- Encourage students to use historical knowledge and the perspectives of their assigned roles to guide their negotiations. They should consider the goals and challenges of their group, as well as the potential consequences of their decisions.
- As the students negotiate, observe their discussions and interactions. Take notes on the outcomes, agreements, disagreements, and the reasoning behind their decisions.
- After a designated negotiation period, pause the simulation and gather the students for a debriefing session.
Debriefing:
- Facilitate a class discussion to reflect on the simulation. Ask students to share their experiences, challenges faced, and decisions made during the negotiation process.
- Discuss the different perspectives and interests represented by each role. Encourage students to analyze the motivations and actions of their assigned roles.
- Explore the outcomes of the negotiation rounds. Did the groups reach agreements? How did they address conflicting interests? What were the consequences of their decisions?
- Connect the simulation to the historical reality of the Reconstruction era. Discuss how the challenges faced during the simulation mirror the actual difficulties encountered by various groups during that time.
- Encourage students to consider the long-term impact of Reconstruction on American society and how the decisions made during that era shaped the nation's future.
Activity: Socratic Seminar on Post-Civil War Transformations
- Objective: To facilitate a meaningful class discussion on the impact of the Civil War on American society, the challenges of Reconstruction, and the experiences of different social groups during this period.
Introduction (5 minutes):- Begin the activity by briefly summarizing the key historical events and transformations that occurred between 1863 CE and 1870 CE, including the Civil War and the Reconstruction era.
- Explain the purpose of the Socratic Seminar: to foster open dialogue, critical thinking, and respectful exchange of ideas among students.
Preparing for the Seminar (10 minutes):- Provide students with guiding questions related to the topics of the impact of the Civil War, the challenges of Reconstruction, and the experiences of different social groups during this period. Alternatively, students can generate their own questions based on their prior knowledge or research.
- Give students a few minutes to review the questions individually or in small groups, encouraging them to jot down their initial thoughts or key points they want to discuss.
Setting up the Seminar (5 minutes):- Arrange the classroom in a circle or semicircle formation to promote an inclusive and open environment for discussion.
- Remind students of the importance of active listening, respect for diverse perspectives, and constructive engagement throughout the seminar.
Seminar Discussion (30-40 minutes):- Facilitate the discussion by posing one question at a time to the class.
- Encourage students to share their opinions, experiences, and insights related to the question. Remind them to support their arguments with evidence from historical sources, such as primary documents or secondary readings.
- Maintain a balance between student-led discussion and providing guidance or clarifications when necessary.
- As the discussion progresses, write key points or themes on the whiteboard or chalkboard to visually summarize the ideas being shared.
Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for the pièce de résistance of this classroom module - the summary section. As we embark on this tantalizing journey, we'll savor the exquisite flavors of knowledge, highlighting the fundamental ingredients and spices that have seasoned our minds throughout these captivating lessons. Prepare to indulge in a savory recap that will leave your intellectual taste buds tingling, serving as a passport to further enlightenment.
In the tumultuous period between 1863 and 1870, the United States was juggling much more than just the Civil War. It was a time of significant events that shaped the nation's trajectory. We're talking about the Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of some fancy-sounding amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th, in case you're wondering), Reconstruction, and the emergence of the Ku Klux Klan. The Emancipation Proclamation was about freeing enslaved individuals in those Confederate states. At the same time, the subsequent amendments went on to abolish slavery, give citizenship to anyone born or naturalized in the country, and ensure voting rights regardless of race or servitude. But don't let that fool you—Reconstruction was no walk in the park for African Americans. The rise of the Ku Klux Klan and other nasty forms of discrimination and racism seriously hampered progress. If we dig into these historic events today, we might get some clarity on the whole race and civil rights mess we're still dealing with.
Now let's talk about the economy, baby. After the Civil War, shit got messy in the South and the West. The South took a beating when slavery was kicked to the curb, leaving them in dire straits. They were broke and desperately needed Uncle Sam to throw them a bone. Meanwhile, out in the West, things were poppin'. The government was throwing money at infrastructure projects, with the Transcontinental Railroad taking center stage. This bad boy connected the Pacific Ocean to the Missouri River, saying, "Come on over, folks! It's open season for settlers, resource hunters, and farmers!" Industrialization, urbanization, and all that jazz thrived in the West, thanks to the railroad and the government's prying hands. But let's not forget the dark side of progress, my friends. Indigenous peoples got shoved aside, and the environment took a real beating. So, when we study this era, we're not just looking at the rise of economic inequality and regional differences but also examining the consequences of those big dreams of ambitious infrastructure projects.
Or, in other words:
In the tumultuous period between 1863 and 1870, the United States was juggling much more than just the Civil War. It was a time of significant events that shaped the nation's trajectory. We're talking about the Emancipation Proclamation, the ratification of some fancy-sounding amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th, in case you're wondering), Reconstruction, and the emergence of the Ku Klux Klan. The Emancipation Proclamation was about freeing enslaved individuals in those Confederate states. At the same time, the subsequent amendments went on to abolish slavery, give citizenship to anyone born or naturalized in the country, and ensure voting rights regardless of race or servitude. But don't let that fool you—Reconstruction was no walk in the park for African Americans. The rise of the Ku Klux Klan and other nasty forms of discrimination and racism seriously hampered progress. If we dig into these historic events today, we might get some clarity on the whole race and civil rights mess we're still dealing with.
Now let's talk about the economy, baby. After the Civil War, shit got messy in the South and the West. The South took a beating when slavery was kicked to the curb, leaving them in dire straits. They were broke and desperately needed Uncle Sam to throw them a bone. Meanwhile, out in the West, things were poppin'. The government was throwing money at infrastructure projects, with the Transcontinental Railroad taking center stage. This bad boy connected the Pacific Ocean to the Missouri River, saying, "Come on over, folks! It's open season for settlers, resource hunters, and farmers!" Industrialization, urbanization, and all that jazz thrived in the West, thanks to the railroad and the government's prying hands. But let's not forget the dark side of progress, my friends. Indigenous peoples got shoved aside, and the environment took a real beating. So, when we study this era, we're not just looking at the rise of economic inequality and regional differences but also examining the consequences of those big dreams of ambitious infrastructure projects.
Or, in other words:
- Important things happened in the United States from 1863 to 1870, alongside the Civil War.
- These events included the Emancipation Proclamation and ratifying the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments.
- The Emancipation Proclamation set enslaved people in Confederate states free.
- The amendments made slavery illegal, gave citizenship to people born or naturalized in the US, and guaranteed voting rights for everyone, regardless of race.
- Reconstruction was a tough time for African Americans due to discrimination and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan.
- Studying these events helps us understand the issues of race and civil rights today.
- After the Civil War, the South and the West faced economic challenges.
- The South struggled because of the end of slavery and needed help from the government.
- The West had an economic boom with projects like the Transcontinental Railroad.
- The railroad connected the Pacific Ocean to the Missouri River, allowing settlers, resource hunters, and farmers to move westward.
- Thanks to the railroad and government support, the West saw industrial growth, cities being built, and more farming.
- However, the progress in the West caused problems like displacing indigenous people and harming the environment.
- Learning about this time helps us understand economic inequality, regional development, and the effects of big infrastructure projects.
ASSIGNMENTS
Forum Discussion #15
"American Experience" fuses captivating dramatic re-enactments with insightful commentary from historians and authors, offering a fascinating exploration of the individuals, events, and resources that have profoundly shaped America's rich history and enduring influence. Numerous documentaries within the program have garnered prestigious accolades from the broadcasting community, including Emmy, Peabody, and duPont-Columbia University awards.
- Forum Discussion #15
- FINAL VIDEO PROJECT DUE
Forum Discussion #15
"American Experience" fuses captivating dramatic re-enactments with insightful commentary from historians and authors, offering a fascinating exploration of the individuals, events, and resources that have profoundly shaped America's rich history and enduring influence. Numerous documentaries within the program have garnered prestigious accolades from the broadcasting community, including Emmy, Peabody, and duPont-Columbia University awards.
How does the story of the Chinese Exclusion Act and its impact on Chinese immigrants challenge our perception of American ideals such as liberty, equality, and justice?
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
It's the late 19th century, and as Lady Liberty's pedestal fundraising starts gaining steam, a letter emerges in "The New York Sun" penned by Saum Song Bo, a gutsy Chinese immigrant. This letter takes a sledgehammer to the idea of American liberty, pointing out that while the statue represents freedom for all, the Chinese were left out in the cold. And when you thought things couldn't get any worse, along comes the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, a grand display of racism and xenophobia that singled out the Chinese like nobody's business. This law put a big fat "No Entry" sign on America's door, banning Chinese workers and denying them the chance to become citizens. It was an unparalleled moment in American history, a real slap in the face to the principles of liberty and justice. Let's not forget this isn't just any sob story. The Chinese-Americans fought back, making this country a tad less terrible than before. They helped shape our values today, like equal protection under the law and the right to education. The Chinese Exclusion Act may have been forgotten, but its outrageousness should burn in our memories. It challenges what it means to be an American and forces us to confront the dark underbelly of our nation's history.
Need help? Remember the Discussion Board Rubric.
THE RUNDOWN
It's the late 19th century, and as Lady Liberty's pedestal fundraising starts gaining steam, a letter emerges in "The New York Sun" penned by Saum Song Bo, a gutsy Chinese immigrant. This letter takes a sledgehammer to the idea of American liberty, pointing out that while the statue represents freedom for all, the Chinese were left out in the cold. And when you thought things couldn't get any worse, along comes the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, a grand display of racism and xenophobia that singled out the Chinese like nobody's business. This law put a big fat "No Entry" sign on America's door, banning Chinese workers and denying them the chance to become citizens. It was an unparalleled moment in American history, a real slap in the face to the principles of liberty and justice. Let's not forget this isn't just any sob story. The Chinese-Americans fought back, making this country a tad less terrible than before. They helped shape our values today, like equal protection under the law and the right to education. The Chinese Exclusion Act may have been forgotten, but its outrageousness should burn in our memories. It challenges what it means to be an American and forces us to confront the dark underbelly of our nation's history.
Hey, welcome to the work cited section! Here's where you'll find all the heavy hitters that inspired the content you've just consumed. Some might think citations are as dull as unbuttered toast, but nothing gets my intellectual juices flowing like a good reference list. Don't get me wrong, just because we've cited a source; doesn't mean we're always going to see eye-to-eye. But that's the beauty of it - it's up to you to chew on the material and come to conclusions. Listen, we've gone to great lengths to ensure these citations are accurate, but let's face it, we're all human. So, give us a holler if you notice any mistakes or suggest more sources. We're always looking to up our game. Ultimately, it's all about pursuing knowledge and truth.
Work Cited:
Work Cited:
- Hiltzik, Michael A. Iron Empires: Robber Barons, Railroads, and the Making of Modern America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2020.
- Turner, Frederick Jackson. The Frontier in American History. Holt Paperbacks, 1996.
LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO
- (Disclaimer: This is not professional or legal advice. If it were, the article would be followed with an invoice. Do not expect to win any social media arguments by hyperlinking my articles. Chances are, we are both wrong).
- (Trigger Warning: This article or section, or pages it links to, contains antiquated language or disturbing images which may be triggering to some.)
- (Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is granted, provided that the author (or authors) and www.ryanglancaster.com are appropriately cited.)
- This site is for educational purposes only.
- Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
- Fair Use Definition: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.